Apparently, the final certification of schoolchildren in a new format - the unified and basic state exams (USE and OGE) - has taken root and every year finds an increasing number of supporters. The content of the exams is being improved, teachers and children, for the most part, are now deprived of the fears that accompanied the USE initially, and the positive results of the reform to ensure transparent and equal conditions for graduates when entering higher educational institutions are obvious. However, the problems associated with the involvement of teachers in the organization of examinations are still hushed up. Although our ears were buzzing about “living according to the law,” in this case, it seems that the state proceeds from concepts, and, above all, about the diligence and conscientiousness of a Russian teacher, which are very convenient to cover up state carelessness and shamelessness.
Let's start with the fact that the involvement of teachers at final exams as guards in classrooms, corridors, in fact, has nothing to do with their functionality. Since on the day of the exam, teachers of this subject and these students cannot be at the point of admission (PET), most often primary school teachers are involved in the exam and the exam. Why on earth should primary school teachers read instructions, make sure there are no mobile phones and cheat sheets, escort graduates to the toilet, sit stupidly under CCTV cameras for hours, etc.? There is only one explanation - they do not need to pay extra. Indeed, for greater objectivity, it would be necessary to create special audiences outside schools, to recruit organizers from among third parties, but this would entail significant costs. Why, when this role can be placed on the shoulders of school teachers in a voluntary-compulsory manner?
And no one is interested in the fact that the last week of May is a study week, that on the days of the exams, schools that are examination points are forced to cancel classes, and teachers recruited for the Unified State Examination-OGE lose lessons every time. From the point of view of the layman - you think, what a disaster, the children will go on vacation earlier. It seems to be a trifle. But from the position of Rosobrnadzor, an unconducted lesson or two is a failure to comply with the educational standard, a gross violation that threatens an educational institution with serious sanctions. Therefore, schools are forced to somehow innovate, conduct classes on the second shift, teachers - to condense the material, to attribute lessons that did not take place in reality. In any case, to sacrifice their main tasks of educating and raising children. For example, for the sake of the duties of an escort, who takes graduates to the PES, and is obliged to stay in a separate room for the entire time of the exam, or even just in the corridor, languishing from idleness.
In the discussions of recent years, questions have repeatedly been raised about the quality of control and measuring materials; means of preventing violations that could lead to a distortion of the objectivity of the results; psychological preparation of schoolchildren for exams, etc., and not once about the attitude towards a teacher who provides free USE. No, of course, there are Jesuit rules for remuneration for this work under a separate agreement, they can be used, but then in the time sheet at the main place of work, the person will not be given the actual day worked, and he will lose much more than he gains.
But let us return to the question of the attitude towards the teacher. Being the leader at the exam, the organizer in the classroom, the duty officer in the corridor, he arrives at 8.00. The exam starts at 10 and sometimes lasts more than 4 hours (including the time for briefing). Then, at the end, the organizers and the leader pack the materials and fill out various forms. The result is seven hours. According to existing requirements, there should not be any unauthorized persons in the PES, all unused premises are sealed, including school canteens. Thus, people spend the whole working day without lunch, which is a violation of Article 108 of the Labor Code of the Russian Federation. Why the procedure for conducting the exam is higher than the Labor Code and the physiological needs of a person, no one, including the Minister of Education, is able to explain.
Communicating with each other on the teacher's portal, colleagues write: "Many have diseases in which you need to eat more than once a day. My friend sat on the exam and got an exacerbation of the ulcer", "I sit on exams 2 times a week in the corridor. In my pocket small cookies, a bottle of water on the windowsill. While no one sees, we refresh ourselves. Mocking people. Try not to let workers go to the factory for a lunch break! The trade union won’t even say a word for us ...", "Even sandwiches and tea are forbidden here for some reason", "I was the organizer once this year. By the end of the whole process, I started to feel sick and shake from hunger. Only water was allowed with me. You can’t leave the audience", "As a result of an intensive week with endless intensively treated the stomach on Saturday and Sunday ... ". Administrations required medical certificates from patients with diabetes mellitus. A teacher from Moscow published a document from the city department with permission to bring food in transparent plastic containers, which was perceived by users as the pinnacle of mercy.
Another point is connected with the arrival at the PES, because often it is located in a different locality. It would be interesting to know how much was allocated in the budgets to reimburse teachers for travel expenses. I can assume that in the Kirov region - zero. I'm trying to remember in what year of the "fat decade" the practice of paying teachers for expenses related to business trips (to meetings of methodological associations, events, conferences, the Unified State Exam-OGE) was discontinued. Probably, with the first salary increase - apparently, the financiers figured out where else to put that kind of money?! Forced to perform other people's duties and even not pay for the fare - and someone else says that we have inefficient management?
"Well, is it really possible?" - I'm looking for sympathy from a friend. "You yourself taught them to treat themselves like that," he snaps. Yes, we are not French, we do not go out in thousands on many months of strikes, protecting our labor rights. We are submissive and diligent. Additional load, lunch, travel - like such trifles, because children are the main thing. But isn't it from such trifles that a lesson is formed, the knowledge and skills of which turn out to be the most durable in our graduates, including "hundred-pointers"?
Schools will take into account the extracurricular achievements of applicants - “for example, creative, in sports, and so on, which together is called the student’s portfolio, according to which the average score will be calculated,” Dmitry Livanov, Minister of Education and Science of the Russian Federation, explained his idea in early June. The average score of the certificate is also planned to be added to the USE scores. The rules for admission to universities may change as early as September, while this issue is still being discussed.
2. Take the exam online
At first it will be possible to pass through the Internet computer science, and then other subjects, Dmitry Livanov said on June 20. According to Yevgeny Semchenko, head of the education quality assessment department of Rosobrnadzor, an experiment on the introduction of computer testing will be introduced next summer. All assignments will be delivered to the graduate online.
3. Increase the number of required exams
“I consider the system abnormal when children pass only two mandatory USE, many children simply stop studying in other subjects,” Vyacheslav Nikonov, head of the State Duma Committee on Education, said on June 20. Unnecessary knowledge, according to the deputy, does not happen - "knowledge in geography is also necessary for mathematics." Earlier, Federation Council Chairman Valentina Matviyenko also proposed making at least the Unified State Examination in the history of Russia obligatory, now members of the Federation Council are planning to apply to the Ministry of Education and Science with this idea.
4. Increase the number of job options and create their open bank
122 members The exam in Moscow was removed from the exams after they were found to have mobile phones. All had their results cancelled.
“The number of basic USE options for each region should be at least 30-40; to create a larger number of options, it will be necessary to increase the bank of USE tasks. This can be done in one year, if this case does not remain the monopoly of the federal commissions, but is carried out by competition, ”said Tamara Eidelman, a history teacher at gymnasium No. 1567, at a round table devoted to the Unified State Exam on June 20. So far, according to Yevgeny Semchenko from Rosobrnadzor, it is planned to create an open bank of USE assignments in various subjects, and not just in mathematics.
5. Forbid students to go to the toilet during the exam
0.76% graduates(or 5,000 people) across the country passed the Unified State Exam for two compulsory exams at once - in Russian and mathematics
Modern graduates were catastrophically spoiled by the "toilet issue," one of the teachers at the same round table noted: "They can go out once, twice, three - we have no right not to let them out." It is necessary to compare the exam not with the former school, but with university exams - where it was possible to leave, but it is no longer possible to return, agreed Isaac Kalina. “If a person has a disease, let him write a statement, pass the exam in a gentle mode. The longest exam is 3 hours 55 minutes, you can be patient,” the head of the department is sure.
6. Cancel the results of all if one has been debited
3500 people in Russia, they completed task C (the most difficult) at the Unified State Examination in mathematics
Rosobrnadzor plans to cancel the USE results for all students in a particular classroom if at least one of them violates the rules for passing. So far, only the organizers seem to be bound by “mutual responsibility”: when it was discovered this year in the 29th school of the Western District of Moscow that a mathematics teacher from the 1488th school was helping his students in the exam, not only she had to write a letter of resignation, but and directors of both institutions.
7. Do not count works that are 100% identical to the keys
14 regions This year they spoke in favor of the complete abolition of the exam
According to teachers, often on the exam you have to deal with works that match the keys word for word. At the same time, as noted in Rosobrnadzor, in a foreign language, if more than 30% are cited, the result of completing tasks is assessed as zero. Now, according to Semchenko, the federal institute is preparing the same changes in other subjects. This year, “in some regions, up to several hundred papers on individual subjects are being prepared to score zero points, because they coincided with articles on Wikipedia,” the head of the department specified.
8. Prohibit reducing points on appeals
“Yes, this is not a mistake, but we will find two other mistakes for you and lower your mark” - this attitude is often faced by graduates on appeals, Nadezhda Shapiro, teacher of Russian language and literature at gymnasium No. 67, said. Task C, according to her, is not checked at all or is checked arbitrarily. “Setting all people to appeal is to explain to the child that he himself is to blame. A girl comes to me in tears, she says, she was told: you can’t use the expression “with fire in your eyes”, because it’s a “burn of the cornea” or write “a thought came to mind” - does a thought have legs? Shapiro said. As director of gymnasium No. 45 Mikhail Shneider noted, teachers are often not allowed to appeal, although, according to Isaac Kalina, they have every right to be present there.
True, only the teachers themselves have come up with this proposal so far. The Ministry of Education and Science did not raise this issue.
9. Refuse the USE when evaluating the effectiveness of schools
“It is obvious to us that honesty or dishonesty in the conduct of the Unified State Examination is a reason to think about trust in the regional leadership of the education system,” said Dmitry Livanov. However, the Moscow Department of Education does not intend to refuse such an assessment, however, for the time being - moreover, as its head Isaac Kalina said at the round table, next year this will be taken into account when including schools among the best in the department's rating.
10. Attract more observers
The number of exam sites in Moscow this year has halved, from 500 to 300, while the number of observers has more than doubled, from 2,500 to nearly 6,000,000. Sergey Gorbun, Head of the Department of State Supervision and Control of the Department of Education of Moscow, announced this at the round table. According to him, at each exam there were from 3 to 12 observers in the audience and outside it. If last year only seven administrative violations were revealed, this year there are already 25 of them. More than a hundred (122 students) were removed from exams for using mobile phones and cheat sheets. At the same time, as Lyudmila Myasnikova, chairman of the parent advisory council at the department, noted, there are still not enough observers at the USE.
I have long dreamed of seeing with my own eyes how the Unified State Examination or the OGE are conducted. The motive is simple: next year, the daughter is going to the ninth grade, and the Internet and various media are literally swollen with terrible stories about how kids are pressed for testing. You understand, a mother’s heart shrinks, it’s worth imagining your baby (yes, baby - you’ll think that he will soon be taller than me) under the yoke of harsh guards. Naturally, I wanted to find out if testing is as scary as they are painted. It didn’t work out: as a journalist, I was always ordered to enter school tests. According to the rules, the maximum that a media representative is allowed to see is how envelopes with tests are opened. After that - dosvidos, everyone out! However, now - a miracle! - got lucky. At my daughter's school, they began to recruit observers for exams, and I immediately proposed my candidacy. To those who will undertake to shame me that I cheated, I will immediately say: everything is fair with us. Initially, she did not hide her belonging to the writing fraternity, but when she went for testing, she left at home a voice recorder, a camera, and even journalistic crusts. So you can consider this text not so much as an article by the SG-26 correspondent, but as the impressions of an average resident of Zheleznogorsk from the final exams. So, I am a public observer.
supervisedcameras
It would seem, what could be so complicated in the work of an observer? He came at the appointed time to the appointed place, served the allotted time, making sure that none of the children and teachers violated anything - that's all for a short time. Yep, figurines! It turned out that being among those present at the testing is even more difficult than becoming an observer, for example, at elections to the local Council of Deputies. At the parliamentary vote, everything is simple - you showed a piece of paper that you were given five minutes before the start of the work of the polling stations - and you are already at your post: watch how much you like. And in order to get into the exam at school, you need to go through special instructions - only realizing the seriousness of what is happening, you can get a certificate.
For this same briefing, we were gathered in advance in the assembly hall of one of the city's schools. There were a decent crowd of people: tired after work, responsible mothers (men could be counted on the fingers) diligently listened to what was allowed and not allowed to be done during testing. By the way, the rules turned out to be more than enough: after about ten minutes from the beginning of the meeting, I managed to forget almost everything that was said, except perhaps the postulate about the ban on bags and cell phones, and the words that graduates will be checked at the entrance with a metal detector, and broadcast what is happening during the exam live. Hearing this, the women in the next row began to lament:
Every year it gets tougher and tougher, soon the children will be stripped naked and checked for inappropriate records on the body!
Fortunately, this year it has not come to such strictness. Yes, and I never had a chance to see a check with a metal detector: they were intended only for eleventh graders, but it fell to me to be on duty at the GIA. Or, as they are now called - the main state exams, that is, the OGE.
Funwith a tantrum
And now, that day has come. The observers were told to arrive at the PES school (examination site) by 9 am, half an hour before the ninth graders. And although I get to the porch even earlier, I still have to make my way through a crowd of trembling teenagers. In contrast to my despondent physiognomy, there is an exceptional joy on their faces. Such, you know, with a tantrum, from the series: but we don't care! Here and there - explosions of laughter and a hail of jokes - about everything from civilian costumes of comrades to audience numbers. It seems to show a finger - and they will laugh until you drop. The kind mother inside of me wants to hug everyone and drink valerian from the heart, but the public observer shuts up her pitiful whining and makes her proudly stomp to the door.
There is no particular relaxation at school either. Excitement, it seems, can be cut with a knife: while waiting for the launch of teenagers, educators check whether everything is ready for testing. All classrooms, except for those where exams will be held, are sealed, there is a medical room, and there are tables for accompanying persons in the corridors. I was escorted to a separate room - the place of deployment of observers, I left the forbidden bag with the phone there and went to meet the ninth graders.
With a handleat the ready
Pens, passports and calculators in transparent files are all that teenagers are allowed to carry with them today. An extended list, by the way: my subjects are taking chemistry tests, which is why they were allowed to take non-programmable “cars” with them. However, given the primitiveness of gadgets, this will not help them much, you just won’t have to count in a column.
The children are checked as many as three times: the first time the children have to show documents at the entrance to the school, the second time they require passports in front of the stairs leading to the PES, the third time they verify their identity when entering the classrooms. Then the children sit down at their desks and ... just wait. According to the rules, the schoolchildren must first be instructed, but they must start at the same time - that's a slightly prolonged pause.
Teachers are worried: “You can’t imagine, we are as nervous as children. Just don't mix up the names! And the accompanying whispers recall the exams of past years.
See how strict it is? And in some places, children still manage to carry cribs, - one of the teachers tells me. - A friend from another school told me: she went to the toilet after the exam, and there was a whole scattering of this stuff: finely printed. Now it’s not a problem to replicate such equipment, the technique is getting more and more complicated every year. So the rules are being tightened in the ministry ...
Wrong gender
Her whisper is interrupted by a teacher's choir from the classrooms: teachers simultaneously begin to read the rules in different classrooms and, bogged down in stereo-
the effect of their voices, I, along with the ninth graders, delve into terribly adult words: “violations”, “responsibility”, “appeal”. The explanations of how to fill out the forms generally plunge me into panic horror: yes, I would stick at least a dozen mistakes in these cells, where can the children cope, and even in a state of nervous tension?
Don't worry, my old teacher tells me. - The children took samples, so they are not the first time. Will fill.
Indeed, only two out of a hundred students enter the wrong numbers in the code of the examination form. But, contrary to my expectations, no one punishes them for a mistake: the teachers simply offer to cross out the “left” designations and write new ones on top.
Just think, they made a mistake in the code, - someone from those present says. - Here, at one of the last exams, a guy wrote down a female instead of a male - yes, there was embarrassment. And anyone can put a one instead of a four, especially if he is worried.
To the toiletunder escort
Organizational moments behind, schoolchildren get to work. I wander from office to office and it seems to me that I hear how diligently the schoolchildren sniff and creak with their hands. There is no place for fear or hysteria - everyone is busy with their own business.
Periodically, one of the teenagers asks for a drink or to go to the toilet. And this is where escorts come into play. According to the rules, children cannot hang out at school alone, so they have to go out of need in the company of an adult. Fortunately, teenagers still have the right to personal space, so they go to the bathroom alone. But you have to drink under supervision: from pre-prepared bottles of water. All this is slightly reminiscent of a convoy, however, the world has never seen such benevolent guards. They smile reassuringly at their young companions, broadcasting the positive with their whole appearance: “You will succeed.”
We must pay tribute to the teachers: despite the general nervousness and scrupulous adherence to the rules, during the exam, not a single teacher raises his voice, does not make sudden movements, does not put pressure on the children. This softness and attentiveness (as far as possible) offset the severity of the routine prescribed by the Ministry of Education. So some of the examinees even say thanks to the “escorts” for a joint walk along the corridor, sympathy and silent moral support.
Without spurs
The "first swallows" begin to leave the audience within forty minutes after the start of testing. The clock is ticking, the examination center is gradually emptying, and now we again hear bursts of laughter from the porch of the school: the teenagers have been “let go”, now they are vying to share their impressions of what they have experienced. Some, of course, sit until the last minute, but no longer than it should be: testing ends sharply at 12.20, so those who are late have to dot the papers and hand over the forms to the organizers.
For the sake of interest, I look into the toilets, but I don’t find the promised scattering of cheat sheets: it’s clean here, there are no illegal “evidence”. Looks like they figured it out this time.
The school is emptying, and teachers can finally breathe easy: everything went without incident. And I breathe out with them, convinced that I shouldn’t worry so much about my daughter. Yes, of course, exams are a difficult thing, and admission rules are tightened every year. But now I know for sure: no matter how sophisticated the Ministry of Education is, coming up with new measures to test the strength of schoolchildren, our teachers will do everything to ensure that children have the most comfortable atmosphere without violating the rules. And this, believe me, is worth a lot.
Today, politicians, officials and teachers in the State Duma discussed what is happening with the unified state exam at school. They agreed on two points: the level of the Unified State Examination should not be a criterion for the effectiveness of governors, and the disgrace with the appearance of answers on the Internet should be eliminated by law.
Otherwise, each of the participants in the discussion at the Open Tribune, chaired by Sergei Naryshkin, also had a personal list of the pros and cons of the current USE procedure. Opening the meeting, the speaker of the State Duma acknowledged the insufficient legal regulation of this topic, noting that even the law on education only mentions the USE, so there is a wide field for adjustment ahead. "The main thing is that this form of knowledge testing should be objective and give equal opportunities for education," Naryshkin believes.
"The role of a filter for those who have been idle for eleven years, but were admitted to the final certification, which the traditional exam could not pass before, is performed by the Unified State Examination," believes Isaak Kalina, head of the Moscow Department of Education. And for creatively thinking students there is an opportunity, he believes, to participate in competitions. Kalina, as well as other officials, was in no hurry to discuss the situation with the leaks of answers to the Network, but spoke out against "drawing into the arms race": "In general, all tasks should be open, but the options should not be known to anyone, I'm sure that we can create a system when tasks come to the student by random selection. And he proposes to fight cheating by forbidding going to the toilet: a healthy student can tolerate three hours and fifty-five minutes, and for the rest, surrender can be arranged, taking into account medical indications. Vice-speaker Lyudmila Shvetsova reacted immediately to the "toilet" question: "We have quite a few children with enuresis, and now imagine - which of them is recognized in the eleventh grade? Only those who buy a certificate in advance."
Six months ago, I asked if it was possible to cancel the use of the results of the Unified State Examination as a criterion for evaluating governors, they told me that it was possible, but nothing was done and now socialist competition is going on between the regions, ”corresponding member of the Russian Academy of Education Evgeny Yamburg said gloomily.
He recalled that schools, in turn, receive municipal assignments, and "the salary fund for teachers depends on the level of passing the exam," so "political will is needed here to stop this." Yamburg also turned out to be a supporter of the creation of independent centers for passing the exam, and also suggested introducing the possibility of retaking the exam - and then there will be no all these teenage suicides.
Passing the exam
“Yes, there was such an unpleasant innovation this year, the leak of several tasks, not all, but some of those regions where they were sent by e-mail,” admitted Igor Remorenko, Deputy Minister of Education and Science, “in addition to the leak, there were many more tasks on the Internet, which were given out by swindlers for real". These neat formulations pretty much impressed Dmitry Gushchin, a mathematics teacher from the St. the sets cost several thousand rubles", and then all this began to be posted on social networks. The social network "VKontakte" was forced to block more than two thousand groups (although it is not obliged to do this - there is no legislative norm). "Legislative responsibility for the fact that someone divulged the results of the exam is zero," Gushchin was indignant at the "legal imbalance."
Politicians were generally negative. The first deputy chairman of the Central Committee of the Communist Party of the Russian Federation, Ivan Melnikov, has always been an opponent of the Unified State Examination and sees the only small plus of this system only in the possibility for applicants from the regions to get into central universities - but corruption interferes with this. Melnikov proposed to introduce the voluntariness of passing the unified state exam, to abandon the tests, to offer a choice between an essay and an oral exam: "Next year the USE will not be canceled, but it will not be the same." The leader of A Just Russia, Sergei Mironov, supported these proposals, although he does not know any advantages in the USE at all: "Wouldn't it be cheaper for us not to improve this system, but to gradually eliminate it?"
"We simply removed corruption from universities to schools, and it became total and comprehensive," Mikhail Degtyarev from the Liberal Democratic Party joined the critics.
The USE also had supporters, for example, the deputy director of the Tver gymnasium, Lyudmila Drovosekova, admitted that more of her students began to enter Moscow and St. Petersburg universities. She was supported by the Minister of Education of the Kaluga Region Alexander Anikeev, adding that the governor does not call him to the carpet for the results of the Unified State Examination, because they need objectivity in the region. The media were also accused of a negative attitude towards the exam. For example, FOM project director Larisa Pautova believes that the press is brainwashing and creating myths. Surprisingly, according to the FOM poll this year, 51% of respondents consider the introduction of the Unified State Examination to be wrong - this is the power of the media. The invited guests recommended that politicians conduct a parliamentary investigation into the results of the leak to the Web. "The range of opinions among politicians is significant, but teachers or employees of the executive branch who themselves answer - there is already a small range of opinions," Naryshkin concluded. "The potential of the Unified State Examination is far from exhausted, there are mistakes and they need to be corrected."
The most important people USE- these are, of course, those who rent it, - USE participants. They are required to arrive promptly at PES with a passport, hand over all gadgets accompanying person or leave it in a storage room for personal belongings, and then follow the instructions of the organizers. Of course, highly desirable prepare for the exam, including psychologically. However, if a graduate studied during the year open bank of USE assignments he has nothing to be afraid of. Please note that if you are late, you will be admitted to the exam, but the time for completing the exam paper will not be extended even for a second.
On the entrance to the PES of USE participants meets responsible organizer outside the audience together with head of the PES. Please note that the staff of the school where the PES, including its director, cannot be PES leaders, nor organizers at the exam. Otherwise, this violation of the procedure for conducting the exam. In job responsibilities organizers outside the audience and PES leaders, as well as representatives of the police, does not include a personal search USE participants. This means that students may be asked to hand over communications equipment if they are found, but they are not allowed to not only search, but even ask them to turn out their pockets or open their jackets. You will not be allowed to take the exam only if refusal to hand over electronic devices or reference materials, issuing a refusal by the relevant act.
Unfortunately, when I was my escort, I happened to observe the ugly scene of the search of children by the headmaster of the school where the exam was held. She clapped them, felt the linings, got into her pockets, while I was struck by the humility with which the boys and girls obeyed her. When I asked why she was doing this, and stated that no one would lay a finger on the children from our school, she was taken aback. The lady policeman immediately pretended that it was terribly important for her to see something tiny at the other end of the corridor, and SEC representative silently and instantly disappeared from sight. Don't be afraid to stand up for your rights. If something similar happens to you, I recommend that you tell your parents so that they immediately call USE hotline in the region. After my call, the searches stopped. True, and more of me accompanying person not appointed, but that's another story.
Organizers in the audience- the most important people USE participants: it is they who ensure compliance with the examination procedure. The organizers cannot be teachers of the subject being handed over, as well as pedagogical workers of the school in which the PES. This is what they distribute KIM and pack USE answer forms, read out instructions for the participant of the exam, draw on the board sample registration fields of the registration form for the USE participant, remind you of the end time of the exam.
After distribution KIM the organizers do not have the right to walk around the audience, take out examination materials and drafts from it, make any notes and answer the questions of the examiners, including those related to the exam procedure. They are forbidden to carry not only means of communication and photo or video filming, but even fiction.
Public observers- these are people who want to personally supervise the course of the exam or consideration appeals about disagreement with the results of the exam. To do this, they submit an application in the prescribed form and are accredited. Public observers can move freely around PES to check the premises PES and be present in the classroom during the exam. In this case, they are prohibited from walking around the audience, making contact with USE participants and organizers and distract them in any way. Of course, they also should not have any gadgets with them.
Floor attendants appointed from among the support staff of the school. In charge floor attendants includes escort to the toilet and, if necessary, to the first-aid post, while going to the toilet and checking what is being done there USE participant they are not eligible. Sometimes this is done under the pretext that there may be cheat sheets in the toilet. In this case, I recommend that you answer that you can put something in the toilet only with the authority of the director of the school where you are PES, and that you will certainly tell about such an assumption by USE hotline phone.
Outside of this article were technical specialists and such an important person as SEC member– State Examination Commission. It is incumbent on him to ensure that USE order and take from USE participants an appeal about the violation this order. Need to know that after going beyond PES appeals of this kind are not accepted.
Most importantly, they are prescribed for all adults during the exam -