The abolition of the GKO was carried out. State Defense Committee (GKO)

Creation of GKO

Stalin's actions in the first days of the war can be described as hectic, erratic and reactive. Not in control of the situation, not knowing how to lead the troops, Stalin simply tried to do something, because it was impossible to do nothing. These were mostly desperate and inadequate attempts to launch a counterattack, which often, if not in most cases, worsened the situation and caused new casualties.

Stalin, apparently, was fully aware of how great was the threat hanging over the country. There is convincing evidence that already in the first days of the war, Stalin tried to negotiate with Hitler, ceding to him a number of Soviet territories in the west of the USSR in exchange for a cessation of hostilities. On behalf of Stalin, Beria organized a meeting of his representative with the envoy of the allied Germany of Bulgaria. The diplomat, with the hope of being handed over to Hitler, was asked about the terms of the peace: what territories does Germany claim? The fate of this initiative is unknown. Most likely, the Bulgarian envoy simply did not get involved in mediation. However, this probing of the soil speaks volumes. Even if this was a maneuver designed to dampen the German offensive, it is clear that Stalin was aware of the threat of defeat.

Other facts testified to the same. Along with extensive mobilization into the Red Army and the preparation of new lines of defense, mass evacuation began already in the first days of the war. Moreover, not only the population and material resources from the front-line areas were subject to export. A secret but very revealing evacuation of the capital was carried out, which was still at a considerable distance from the hostilities. On June 27, 1941, the Politburo approved a resolution on the urgent (within three days) removal from Moscow of state stocks of precious metals, precious stones, the USSR Diamond Fund and the values ​​of the Kremlin Armory. On June 28, just as urgently, it was decided to evacuate banknotes from the Moscow vaults of the State Bank and Gosznak. On June 29, a decision was made to transfer to the rear the apparatuses of the people's commissariats and other leading institutions. On July 2, the Politburo decided to take the sarcophagus with the body of Lenin to Siberia, and on July 5, the archives, primarily the archives of the government and the Central Committee of the party.

One of the functionaries, called on the afternoon of June 26 to Stalin, recalled: “Stalin looked unusual. The view is not just tired. The appearance of a person who has suffered a strong internal shock. Before meeting him, I felt from all sorts of indirect facts that it was very difficult for us there, in the border battles. Perhaps destruction is brewing. When I saw Stalin, I realized that the worst had already happened.” The next few days brought no relief. Stalin became increasingly aware of the futility of his orders and the degree of uncontrollability of the army.

Just a week after the start of the war, disturbing news began to arrive in Moscow about the dire situation of the Western Front and the surrender of the capital of Belarus, Minsk. Communication with the troops was largely lost. There was a heavy pause in the Kremlin. On June 29, for the first time since the beginning of the war, no meetings were recorded in Stalin's Kremlin office. According to Mikoyan, in the evening Molotov, Malenkov, Mikoyan and Beria gathered at Stalin's. Most likely, the meeting took place either in Stalin's Kremlin apartment or at his dacha. Stalin called Timoshenko. Again to no avail. The military was out of control. Alarmed, Stalin broke the usual routine and invited the members of the Politburo to go to the People's Commissariat of Defense. Here he was once again convinced that the catastrophe had acquired enormous proportions. Stalin attacked the generals with reproaches and accusations. Unable to withstand the tension, Chief of the General Staff Zhukov burst into tears and ran into the next room. Molotov went to reassure him. This scene, apparently, sobered Stalin. He realized that it was useless to put pressure on the military. Leaving the building of the People's Commissariat of Defense, Stalin, according to Mikoyan and Molotov, said: "Lenin left us a great legacy, we - his heirs - pissed it all off."

Strong language and rudeness were not uncommon for Stalin. However, in this case, they reflected a really high degree of confusion. From the People's Commissariat of Defense, Stalin, apparently, went to the country.

The next day, June 30, Stalin did not appear not only in his Kremlin office, but in general in Moscow. In a situation of growing catastrophe, such self-isolation could have critical consequences. The huge administrative machine, built for Stalin, inevitably failed in his absence. Something had to be done. The initiative was taken by Molotov, senior in the informal hierarchy of Politburo members. According to Mikoyan, Molotov declared: "Stalin has such a prostration that he is not interested in anything, has lost the initiative, is in a bad state." Indirectly, this was confirmed many years later by Molotov himself in conversations with Chuev: “He didn’t show up for two or three days, he was at the dacha. He was worried, of course, was a little depressed. It is obvious that Molotov's memory betrayed the details: Stalin stayed at the dacha for a shorter period than two or three days. However, in the conditions of the catastrophic start of the war, even the short absence of the leader was naturally perceived as critical.

Alarmed, Molotov decided to act. He summoned Beria, Malenkov and Voroshilov to a meeting. This, of course, was not about the formal or actual ousting of Stalin from power. The comrades-in-arms puzzled over how to "lure" Stalin out of the dacha, to force him to return to business. The task was not easy. The established order did not involve visits to Stalin's dacha without an invitation. In an emergency, such an unauthorized visit could be perceived by Stalin with particular pain. It was no less difficult to formulate the reason for such a trip. To openly tell Stalin that his depression threatens the security of the state, no one would have dared. However, members of the Politburo, who had become adept at political intrigues, came up with a brilliant move. They decided all together (necessarily together!) To go to Stalin and propose to him a project for the creation of a supreme authority for the war period - the State Defense Committee, headed by Stalin himself. In addition to Stalin, it was proposed to include the four developers of the project in the State Defense Committee. Molotov was appointed first deputy chairman of the GKO.

Now everything worked out smoothly and convincingly. There was a good reason for visiting Stalin, which had nothing to do with the fact that he did not appear at the workplace. The proposal to create a State Defense Committee headed by Stalin demonstrated not only the determination to continue the struggle, but also the devotion of the comrades-in-arms to the leader. The collective trip made it possible to smooth out Stalin's possible indignation.

When the plan was agreed upon by Molotov, Malenkov, Voroshilov and Beria, Mikoyan and Voznesensky were called into Molotov's office. They were two members of the steering group whom the Quartet decided not to include in the GKO. However, Mikoyan and Voznesensky, demonstrating the unity of the ranks, had to go to Stalin's dacha.

The story of what happened at Stalin's dacha was left by Mikoyan. According to him, the delegation found Stalin in a small dining room, sitting in an armchair. He looked inquiringly at his companions and asked why they had come. “He looked calm, but somehow strange,” Mikoyan recalled. After listening to the proposal to create a GKO, Stalin agreed. A small altercation was caused by the Quartet's project on the personal composition of the State Defense Committee, voiced by Beria. Stalin suggested including Mikoyan and Voznesensky in the GKO as well. However, Beria, authorized by the "four", outlined the arguments "against" - someone should remain in leadership in the Council of People's Commissars. Stalin did not object.

The publication of Mikoyan's memoirs in 1999, prepared by his son S. A. Mikoyan, in this fragment contains numerous changes and inscriptions in the original text, preserved in the archive. S. A. Mikoyan was clearly trying to create the impression of Stalin's fear. For this purpose, the following phrases were inscribed in the original dictations of A. I. Mikoyan: “When he saw us, he (Stalin. - OH.) as if pressed into an armchair”; “I have (Mikoyan. - OH.) there was no doubt: he decided that we had come to arrest him. However, it is important to remember that these accents were added later and do not belong to Mikoyan.

Could Stalin be scared? How to interpret the meeting at the dacha on June 30? Undoubtedly, this was a moment of crisis in the development of Stalin's autocracy. No matter how carefully Stalin's comrades-in-arms behaved, they violated important rules of the political protocol of the dictatorship. The members of the Politburo came to see Stalin, having previously agreed among themselves and on their own initiative. They proposed to make an important decision and insisted on its adoption in the form in which they agreed among themselves. Of fundamental importance was the formal confirmation of the role of Molotov as a second person in the state and the non-inclusion of Voznesensky in the GKO, whom Stalin in May 1941 appointed instead of Molotov as his first deputy in the Council of People's Commissars. In fact, Stalin's comrades-in-arms made it clear to him that in the face of a mortal threat, it was necessary to consolidate the leadership that had developed after the Great Terror, that the new shake-ups at the top, which Stalin started on the eve of the war, should stop. It was a unique episode. It marked a temporary change in the nature of the dictatorship, the emergence of a military political compromise that was somewhere between pre-war tyranny and the Stalinist loyalty of the early 1930s. Forced for Stalin, the principle of compromise relations in the Politburo operated throughout almost the entire war.

The decision to create a State Defense Committee, agreed upon at Stalin's dacha, was published in the newspapers the next day. The inclusion of only Stalin, Molotov, Beria, Voroshilov and Malenkov in the GKO did not mean at all that the other top leaders of the Politburo had lost their administrative influence. Mikoyan and Voznesensky performed the most important economic functions. Zhdanov concentrated entirely on the defense of Leningrad. Kaganovich, as People's Commissar of Railways, was engaged in railways, the importance of which in the conditions of war and evacuation was difficult to overestimate. In February 1942, Mikoyan, Voznesensky and Kaganovich were included in the GKO.

The formation of the State Defense Committee gave impetus to the further concentration in the hands of Stalin of the formal attributes of supreme power. On July 10, 1941, the Headquarters of the High Command, which was headed by People's Commissar for Defense Tymoshenko, was transformed into the Headquarters of the High Command under the leadership of Stalin. On July 19, by decision of the Politburo, Stalin was appointed People's Commissar of Defense, on August 8 - Supreme Commander. Everything fell into place. Stalin returned to the people and the army in his usual image of an autocratic leader, resolute and confident in victory. The most important role in this “return of Stalin” was played by his well-known speech on the radio on July 3rd.

Unlike Molotov, who spoke on June 22 in the building of the Central Telegraph, located next to the Kremlin, Stalin demanded that the broadcast of his speech be organized directly from the Kremlin. The signalmen, overburdened with business, were forced to fulfill this senseless whim. Cables were urgently laid in the building of the Council of People's Commissars. Stalin, who was sitting at a table with microphones and a bottle of Borjomi, read out a speech. This address of Stalin to the people was unique in many respects. “Comrades! Citizens! Brothers and sisters! Soldiers of our army and navy! I turn to you, my friends!” - already this beginning of the speech was unusual and not at all in the Stalinist style. He was specially noted and remembered by many contemporaries of the events. Clinging to the receivers or reading the lines of a newspaper report, people were looking for the answer to the main question in Stalin's words: what will happen next, how soon will the war end? However, Stalin did not say anything encouraging. Significantly exaggerating the losses of the German army (“the best divisions of the enemy and the best parts of his aviation have already been defeated”), Stalin was forced to admit that “it is a matter […] of life and death of the Soviet state, of life and death of the peoples of the USSR.” Stalin's calls to the people to realize "the full depth of the danger that threatens our country", to organize partisan struggle in the rear of the Germans, to create detachments of the people's militia, to remove or destroy all material resources from the territories threatened by capture by the enemy sounded alarming. Stalin declared the outbreak of war national and national. From all this followed the obvious conclusion - the war will be hard and long.

In the meantime, the people and especially the army needed to somehow explain the causes of the disaster, point to the next "scapegoats". Didn't have to search long. Soon, the complete collapse of the Western Front and the mistakes of its leadership, headed by General D. G. Pavlov, were announced, which clearly indicated the direction of demonstrative repressions. Pavlov and a number of his subordinates were put on trial and shot. By orders signed by Stalin, the army was widely informed about this.

This text is an introductory piece.

The Making of a Scientist I have a friend who is an artist, and sometimes he takes a point of view that I don't agree with. He takes the flower and says, "Look how beautiful it is." And then he adds: “Being an artist, I am able to see the beauty of a flower. But you, being a scientist, understand

Creation of ADD Stalin knew well our flight to Warsaw and often remembered it. In conclusion of my brief review, I expressed my firm conviction that the liquidation of the GAs was erroneous, because, being in the hands of the High Command, the GAs, of course, would now be in great

Creation of the KGB of the USSR By Decree of the Council of Ministers of the USSR No. 1134 of 01/24/1956, P. I. Ivashutin was approved as deputy chairman of the KGB under the Council of Ministers of the USSR. He came to the central office of the State Security Committee at a time when the functions of the new department were still being actively discussed.8

Creation of the State Defense Committee Stalin's actions in the first days of the war can be called feverish, disorderly and reactive. Not in control of the situation, not knowing how to lead the troops, Stalin simply tried to do something, because it was impossible to do nothing. Basically these were

Creation of the UPA And this way out was found. The Germans, leading the OUN wire, transferred the OUN organizations to an "illegal" position, created the UPA and thereby revived hope among the nationalist-minded population that in the struggle they would achieve an "independent" Ukraine, and this

Creation of Shekhtel - Let's go to Gorky's house, - said F. G., when we went to Herzen, - it's nearby. You were there? You can go again, otherwise I will never go there alone. They arranged a good job for the great proletarian writer, settled him in the mansion of the richest in Moscow

Creation of TsAKB Memoirs of V.G. Grabin chronologically ends with the beginning of 1942, and we will never learn about subsequent events from the designer himself. But it is possible to restore the picture of Vasily Gavrilovich's life. At the beginning of 1940, Grabin was awarded the rank of military engineer 1

THE CREATION OF THE LEGEND Volkov: Anna Andreevna didn't do anything by accident. Brodsky: It's true.<…>Solomon VOLKOV. Diploma with Brodsky. Page 109The Lord lengthened her days. No matter how you look at it, she was marked by God with at least blessed longevity. That's why it stands on the very

THE CREATION OF SHEKHTEL - Let's go to Gorky's house, - said F. G., when we went to Herzen, - it's nearby. You were there? You can go again, otherwise I will never go there alone. They arranged a good job for the great proletarian writer, settled him in the mansion of the richest in Moscow

Creating an Atmosphere The scrupulousness of creating an atmosphere is the basis of directing. I speak on my own behalf, but relying on the actor and stage theorist I adore - Mikhail Chekhov, who brilliantly formulated several immutable staging laws. Wisdom,

Creation of the SS Troops Augustus brought a decision that complicated the situation of the Wehrmacht: by Hitler's order of August 17, 1938, the long-standing SS military formations were consolidated into the SS "special purpose" troops and thus the SS troops were created. Talk about it

3. Establishing a School My mother started school when she was six years old, but only attended for a few months. In the village where she lived, it was very rare for a father to send his daughter to school. Mom was the only girl in the class. She liked to walk down the street with her bag

Creation of an automaton The international situation became more tense every day. The flames of a new world war had already flared up in Europe. Soviet gunsmiths understood that the fire of war fanned by the Nazis could be transferred from West to East at any time. They

THE CREATION OF "PPD" The international situation became more tense every day. The flames of a new world war have already flared up in Europe. Soviet gunsmiths, realizing that the fire of war, fanned by the Nazis, can be transferred from West to East at any time, diligently

THE CREATION OF A SOCIETY In the last days of May 1924, posters were posted on the streets of Moscow, which attracted the attention of almost every passer-by. And no wonder: the first thing that caught your eye on this poster was the words: "Interplanetary travel." It was a report announcement

Correct article link:

Kodan S.V. — The State Defense Committee in the system of party leadership and state administration in the conditions of the Great Patriotic War of 1941-1945: creation, nature, structure and organization of activity // Genesis: historical research. - 2015. - No. 3. - P. 616 - 636. DOI: 10.7256/2409-868X.2015.3.15198 URL: https://nbpublish.com/library_read_article.php?id=15198

The State Defense Committee in the system of party leadership and state administration in the conditions of the Great Patriotic War of 1941-1945: creation, nature, structure and organization of activities

Kodan Sergey Vladimirovich

Doctor of Law

Professor, Honored Lawyer of the Russian Federation, Member of the Expert Council on Law of the Higher Attestation Commission under the Ministry of Science and Education of the Russian Federation, Professor of the Department of Theory of State and Law of the Ural State Law University, Editor-in-Chief of the journal "Genesis: Historical Research"

620137, Russia, Sverdlovsk region, Yekaterinburg, st. Komsomolskaya, 21, of. 210

Kodan Sergei Vladimirovich

Doctor of Law

Professor, the department of Theory of State and Law, Merited Lawyer of the Russian Federation, Ural State Law Academy; Editor-in-Chief of the Scientific Journal “Genesis: historical studies”

620137, Russia, Sverdlvskaya oblast", g. Ekaterinburg, st. Komsomol"skaya, 21, of. 210

10.7256/2409-868X.2015.3.15198


Date of submission of the article to the editor:

07-05-2015

Publication date:

09-05-2015

Annotation.

The creation and activities of the State Defense Committee reflected the features of state administration in the conditions of the Great Patriotic War of 1941-1945, in which the concentration of all resources was required to win the war. In the prewar years, the system of government of the country finally took shape, in which the Politburo of the Central Committee of the All-Union Communist Party of Bolsheviks determined state policy and actually headed the party and state administration. The creation of the State Defense Committee on June 30, 1941 fully reflected this trend and, in the conditions of the war, as an emergency party-state body, concentrated all power in the state. Declassified archival documents on the activities of the State Defense Committee create new opportunities for studying its activities. The article presents a description of the creation, composition, activities and an overview of the materials of the official record keeping of the State Defense Committee. The article characterizes the State Defense Committee, and the representation of publications of documents on activities in scientific research, indicates the possibility of attracting new materials. The latter is due to the fact that almost the entire array of documents on activities has been declassified and creates opportunities for further research into the history of GKOs.


Keywords: history of the Soviet state, the Great Patriotic War, state administration, emergency governing bodies, party-state governing bodies, military governing bodies, State Defense Committee, composition of the State Defense Committee, organization of the activities of the State Defense Committee, decisions of the State Defense Committee

abstract.

The creation and activity of the State Defense Committee (SDC) reflected the peculiarities of the state administration in the conditions of the Great Patriotic War in 1941-1945 during which the concentration of all the resources were needed to gain the victory. Before the war, the country’s system of administration were fully formed, and the Political Bureau of the Central Committee of the All-Union Communist Party of the Bolsheviks defined the state politics and headed the state administration. The creation of the SDC in June, 30, 1941 fully reflected this tendency and in the conditions of the war took all the state power as an emergency Party and State authorities. Unclassified archive documents about the SDC activity give new opportunities for studying its activity. The article tells about the characteristic features of creation, structure, directions of activity and a review of materials about the official paperwork of the State Defense Committee. The article characterizes the State Defense Committee, shows the documents about the activity of scientific research, defines the possibilities to use new materials. The latter comes out of the fact that all the documents are unclassified and gives many opportunities for the further studying of the SDC history.

keywords:

The history of the Soviet state, The Great Patriotic War, public administration, emergency management agencies, party - government authorities, the military authorities, State Defense Committee, of the ICTs, organization of ICT activities, GKO order

The publication was prepared as part of the implementation of the Russian Humanitarian Foundation project No. 15-03-00624 “Source study of the history of the state and law of Russia (1917 - 1990s)

In the conditions of the Great Patriotic War in 1941 - 1945. a specially created management system operated, in which the State Defense Committee occupied the dominant position from June 30, 1945 to September 4, 1945. The history of the activities of the GKO is very interesting and indicative, since this body reflected the features and combined in its organization two principles - the party and the state, characteristic of the mechanisms of government in Soviet society. But, at the same time, it is also a unique experience in creating, organizing and providing sufficiently effective command and control in wartime.

Within the framework of this article, we will dwell on the issues of the creation and place of the State Defense Committee in the system of party and state administration during the Great Patriotic War, the features of its activities and issued acts, as well as the state of research on the issues and the availability of declassified in the early 2000s. GKO documents.

Creation of the State Defense Committeewas due to the fact that the beginning of the Great Patriotic War showed with all evidence - the pre-war command and administrative control system, even in the conditions of the military mobilization orientation of its orientation and activity, was not able to withstand the large-scale military aggression of Nazi Germany. It required the restructuring of the entire system of political and state administration of the USSR, the creation in the country of new emergency authorities capable of ensuring integrated and coordinated control over the front and rear and "in the shortest possible time to turn the country into a single military camp." On the second day of the war, an organ of the highest collective strategic leadership of the active army was created - the Headquarters of the High Command. And although the Stavka "had all the powers in the strategic leadership of the troops and the forces of the fleet, however, it was not able to exercise power and administrative functions in the field of civil administration." The headquarters also "could not act as a coordinating principle in the activities of civilian power and management structures in the interests of the army in the field, which, naturally, made it difficult for the strategic leadership of the troops and the forces of the fleet." The situation at the front was rapidly deteriorating and this “pushed the top party and state leadership of the USSR to form an authority structure that could become higher in status than not only the Headquarters of the High Command, but also all leading party authorities, state authorities and administration.” The decision to create a new emergency body was considered and approved by a resolution of the Politburo of the Central Committee of the All-Union Communist Party of Bolsheviks.

The creation of the State Defense Committee issued a joint resolution of the Presidium of the Supreme Soviet of the USSR, the Council of People's Commissars of the USSR and the Central Committee of the All-Union Communist Party of Bolsheviks of June 30, 1941. It established two fundamentally important provisions: "Concentrate all power in the state in the hands of the State Defense Committee" (p. 2) and "Oblige all citizens and all party, Soviet, Komsomol and military bodies to unquestioningly comply with the decisions and orders of the State Defense Committee" (p. 2). The composition of the GKO was represented by the leadership of the party and the member states and candidate members of the Politburo of the Central Committee of the All-Union Communist Party of Bolsheviks: I.V. Stalin (chairman), V.M. Molotov, K.E. Voroshilov, G.M. Malenkov, L.P. Beria. Subsequent changes in the composition of the GKO took place in the same personnel vein: in 1942, N.A. Voznesensky, L.M. Kaganovich, A.I. Mikoyan, and in 1944 N.A. Bulganin replaced K.E. Voroshilov. The State Defense Committee was abolished by a decree of the Presidium of the Supreme Council of September 4, 1945 with the wording - “In connection with the end of the war and the end of the state of emergency in the country, it must be recognized that the continued existence of the State Defense Committee is not necessary, whereby the State Defense Committee should be abolished and all of its hand over the affairs to the Council of People's Commissars of the USSR.

It should be noted that the creation of the GKO was not an exceptional phenomenon in the national history of state and law. Its organization can be viewed in the context of a certain continuity in the creation of similar emergency and special bodies in the history of our country. They existed in the Russian Empire, and then in the earlier stages of the existence of the RSFSR and the USSR. So, for example, in Russia, the State Defense Council was created on June 8, 1905 and operated until August 12, 1909, and during the First World War, a Special Conference was created to discuss and unite measures for the defense of the state (1915-1918) . After the October Revolution of 1917, among the political and administrative structures of the Soviet government there were: the Council of Workers' and Peasants' Defense (1918-1920), the Council of Labor and Defense (1920-1937), the Defense Committee under the Council of People's Commissars of the USSR (1937 - June 1941).

The place of the State Defense Committee in the system of party and state administration of the USSRduring the Great Patriotic War, it was determined by its characteristics as a body that was complex in its political and administrative nature - it simultaneously combined both party leadership and state administration of the country. At the same time, the main issue is the preservation or refusal in the conditions of the war from the former, which had developed by the beginning of the 1940s. administrative-command system of the party-Soviet administration in the country. It was actually represented by one person - V.I. Stalin, who relied on a narrow circle of party functionaries and at the same time the leaders of the highest bodies of state power and administration that are part of the Politburo and the Central Committee of the CPSU (b).

Studies of the activities of the State Defense Committee note and focus on one of its important features, which is that the previously existing Soviet emergency bodies, unlike the State Defense Committee, did not replace the activities of party bodies during the war. On this occasion, N.Ya. Komarov emphasizes that “the emergency authorities during the years of the Civil and Great Patriotic Wars differed quite significantly, and primarily in terms of methods of activity. The main feature of the Council of Workers' and Peasants' Defense was that it did not replace party, government and military bodies. The fundamental questions of the conduct of the armed struggle were considered at that time at the Politburo and plenums of the Central Committee, at the congresses of the RCP (b), at meetings of the Council of People's Commissars. During the Great Patriotic War, no plenums, let alone party congresses, were held, all cardinal issues were decided by the State Defense Committee. The tasks of strengthening the country's defense capability, which had become acute on the agenda, were considered by Stalin in the closest unity of the political, economic and military spheres, which made it possible, from the point of view of the chairman of the State Defense Committee, to concentrate the country's political and military efforts on solving urgent problems of defense of our state, on increasing the combat capability of the army and navy. This, finally, ensured the reality of the implementation of the unity of political, economic and military leadership of the entire system of socialist social relations.

The team of authors of the latest study, “The Great Patriotic War of 1941-1945,” answers the question more convincingly. (2015). Considering the place of the "Politburo of the Central Committee of the All-Union Communist Party of Bolsheviks in the system of strategic leadership of the country and the armed forces" in the 11th volume of this publication, the team of authors who prepared it notes: "The Politburo transferred power functions to a new emergency authority - the GKO ... I.V. Stalin and his closest comrades-in-arms, by placing all power on the GKO and becoming part of it, thereby radically changed the power structure in the country, the system of state and military administration. In fact, all decisions of the State Defense Committee, the Politburo of the Central Committee of the All-Union Communist Party of Bolsheviks, the Council of People's Commissars of the USSR, draft decrees of the Presidium of the Supreme Soviet of the USSR were approved by a narrow circle of statesmen: V.M. Molotov, G.M. Malenkov, L.P. Beria, K.E. Voroshilov, L.M. Kaganovich, and then I.V. Stalin decided on behalf of which body it would be advisable to issue this or that administrative document. It is also emphasized that even under the new conditions of governing the country, “the leading role in both the State Defense Committee and the Headquarters of the Supreme High Command belonged to the members of the Politburo. So, the GKO included all members of the Politburo, with the exception of N.A. Voznesensky, and in the Headquarters of the Politburo it was represented by three members of the highest party body: I.V. Stalin, V.M. Molotov and K.E. Voroshilov. Accordingly, the decisions of the GKO were in fact also the decisions of the Politburo of the Central Committee of the All-Union Communist Party of Bolsheviks. ... Members of the Politburo, GKO and Headquarters, representing a single state-political and strategic center of the country's leadership, possessed all available information about the state of affairs in the country and at the front, so they could quickly resolve urgent issues. Thanks to this, the process of making important decisions was significantly accelerated, which had a positive effect on the overall situation at the front and in the rear. Despite the violation of the principles of inner-party democracy, such an approach was justified by the specifics of wartime, when the issues of organizing the defense of the country and mobilizing all forces to repulse the enemy came to the fore. At the same time, "the decisive word both in the Politburo and in the State Defense Committee remained with the head of the country."

The above allows us to speak about the party-state nature of the State Defense Committee, the creation and activities of which reflected the finally formed in the 1930s. the country's governance system, in which the VKP(b) played the leading role in the person of its General Secretary I.V. Stalin and members of the Politburo, and the Soviet state acted as a mechanism for legislative registration and implementation of the political decisions of the party. GKO was primarilyh extraordinary organ of the party leadership in the conditions of war, and his activities fully corresponded to the principles of combining the general party leadership of the country and the use of the Soviet state apparatus to implement the decisions of the party. This did not radically change the previous style of governing the country - the GKO was primarily an organ, albeit an emergency one, of the political, party leadership, a committee discussed and made decisions on the main issues of governing the country in wartime conditions at the level of a very limited number of persons vested with the highest party power - "all officials of the newly formed body were members and candidate members of the Politburo of the Central Committee of the All-Union Communist Party of Bolsheviks." GKO asemergency government agency was characterized by the fact that at the level of the heads of the highest bodies of state power and administration, who occupied key positions in them, the directions of organizational and managerial activity were concentrated. This was also manifested in the organization of the activities of the State Defense Committee - the entire system of military and civilian administration was involved in the implementation of its decisions. At the same time, the State Defense Committee was “the center of emergency power and control, endowed with special powers” ​​and acted as “the main structure, including in the system of bodies of strategic leadership of the country and its armed forces, whose decrees and orders were given the status of wartime laws binding on all” . At the same time, one should take into account the fair remark of military historians that “special emergency state bodies, created in connection with the urgent need for wartime, acted and changed in connection with a perceived need. Then they were formalized in the appropriate legislative order (GKO resolution), but without changing the Constitution of the USSR. Under them, new leadership positions, executive and technical apparatuses were established, in creative searches the technology of emergency management was developed. With their help, it was possible to quickly solve the most pressing problems.

Directions and organization of GKO activitiescombined the principles of collegiality in discussing issues and unity of command in making decisions, and the committee itself acted "as a think tank and a mechanism for restructuring the country on a military footing." At the same time, "the main activity of the GKO was the work on the transfer of the Soviet state from peacetime to wartime." The activities of the committee covered the most complex set of issues in almost all areas of the political and state administration of the country in wartime conditions.

In the organization and activities of the GKO, the leading role belonged to its chairman - I.V. Stalin, who during the war concentrated in his hands all the key party and state posts and at the same time was: Chairman of the State Defense Committee, Supreme Commander, Chairman of the Supreme Command, General Secretary of the Central Committee of the All-Union Communist Party of Bolsheviks, member of the Politburo of the Central Committee of the All-Union Communist Party of Bolsheviks, member of the Organizing Bureau of the Central Committee of the All-Union Communist Party of Bolsheviks (b), member of the Central Committee of the All-Union Communist Party of Bolsheviks, chairman of the Council of People's Commissars of the USSR, People's Commissar of Defense of the USSR, chairman of the Transport Committee of the GKO. I.V. Stalin and his deputy V.M. Molotov “carried out not only the management of the activities of this emergency body, but also the strategic leadership of the country, the armed struggle and the war as a whole. All resolutions and orders of the State Defense Committee came out for their signatures. At the same time, V.M. Molotov also, as People's Commissar for Foreign Affairs, directed the country's foreign policy activities "Military historians also pay attention to the advantages of unity of command in war conditions and emphasize that" having received unlimited powers, I. V. Stalin was able to rationally use them: he not only united, but also implemented huge military-political, administrative and administrative potential of state power and administration in the interests of achieving the strategic goal - victory over Nazi Germany and its allies.

Members of the GKO were assigned to the most responsible areas of work. At the first meeting of the GKO - July 3, 1941 - “seven resolutions of the State Defense Committee were approved on the responsibility for the assigned section of each member of the GKO. ... Members of the GKO G.M. Malenkov, K.E. Voroshilov and L.P. Beria, along with his main duties in the Council of People's Commissars of the USSR, People's Commissariats and the Central Committee of the All-Union Communist Party of Bolsheviks, received new permanent or temporary assignments through the State Defense Committee. Beria in the military-industrial bloc oversaw the people's commissariats (mortar weapons, ammunition for the tank industry), and also, in accordance with the GKO decree of August 29, 1941, he was appointed authorized GKO for armaments and was responsible "for the implementation and overfulfillment by industry of plans for the production of all types weapons." G.M. Malenkov supervised the production of all types of tanks. Marshal K.E. Voroshilov was engaged in military mobilization work. As necessary, assignments were redistributed among the members of the committee.

Under the GKO, working groups and structural subdivisions were created and operated. The working groups were the first structural elements of the GKO apparatus and constituted a team of qualified specialists - 20-50. More stable structural subdivisions of the GKO were committees, commissions, councils, groups, bureaus created as needed. The committee included: a group of authorized GKOs (July - December 1941), an evacuation committee (July 16, 1941 - December 25, 1945), a committee for the evacuation of food and manufactured goods from the front-line zones (since September 25, 1941), Trophy Commission (December 1941 - April 5, 1943), Committee for the Unloading of Railways (December 25, 1941 - February 14, 1942), Transport Committee (February 14, 1942 - May 19, 1944), Operational Bureau of the GKO (from 8 October 1942), Trophy Committee (since April 5, 1943), Radar Board (since July 4, 1943), Special Committee on Reparations (since February 25, 1945), Special Committee on the Use of Atomic Energy (since August 20, 1945).

Of particular importance in the organizational structure of the GKO was the institution of its representatives, who, as representatives of the committee, were sent to enterprises, front-line regions, etc. Military historians note that “the establishment of the institution of GKO commissioners has become a powerful lever for the implementation of not only its decisions. At large enterprises, in addition to authorized GKOs, party organizers of the Central Committee of the All-Union Communist Party of Bolsheviks, Komsomol organizers of the Central Committee of the All-Union Leninist Young Communist League, authorized representatives of the NKVD, authorized by the All-Union Central Council of Trade Unions worked. In other words, there was a whole army of supervisors on issues of performance discipline. It should be noted that most often authorized GKOs, who had incomparably greater rights and opportunities than the heads of enterprises, provided them with invaluable practical assistance. But there were also those who, without delving into the technological processes of production, acting by intimidation and threats, brought confusion. In such cases, a well-founded report to the chairman of the GKO quickly resolved the conflict situation.

The territorial structures of the GKO were the City Defense Committees - local emergency authorities, the decision to establish which the committee made on October 22, 1941. The city defense committees were created by decision of the GKO, were exclusively subordinate to it, and their most important decisions were approved by them. Researchers of the GKO activities note that “city defense committees had the right to declare a city under a state of siege, evacuate residents, give enterprises special tasks for the production of weapons, ammunition, equipment, form a people’s militia and destruction battalions, organize the construction of defensive structures, mobilize the population and transport, create or abolish institutions and organizations. The militia, formations of the NKVD troops and volunteer working detachments were placed at their disposal. In a critically difficult situation, local emergency authorities ensured the unity of government, uniting civil and military power. They were guided by the decisions of the GKO, the decisions of local party and Soviet bodies, the military councils of the fronts and armies. Under them, there was also an institution of commissioners, operational groups were created to urgently resolve military issues, and public activists were widely involved.

Giving a general assessment of the organization of the activities of the State Defense Committee, military historians emphasize: “The most characteristic features of the development of the State Defense Committee were: forced necessity and some spontaneity in the creation of its organizational and functional structures; lack of experience in the formation and structural development of such an authority; management of the structural development of GKOs by the first person of the party and the state - I.V. Stalin; lack of directly subordinated bodies; leadership of the army in the field, society and the national economy through decisions that had the force of wartime laws, as well as through constitutional authorities; the use of the structures of the highest organs of the party, state and executive power of the USSR as executive and technical apparatuses; the absence of previously officially approved tasks, functions and powers of the State Defense Committee and its apparatus” .

Decrees and orders of the GKOdocumented his decisions. Their preparation was not specifically regulated: depending on the complexity of the issues under consideration, they were resolved as quickly as possible or the problem was studied and, if necessary, written reports, information, proposals and other documents submitted from the relevant civil or military authorities were requested and heard. Then there was a discussion of the issues by the members of the committee and decisions were made on them. At the same time, V.I. Stalin. Until the end of 1942, the decisions made were drawn up by A.N. Poskrebyshev (head of the Special Department of the Central Committee), and then - the Operational Bureau of the State Defense Committee. The GKO resolutions were signed by I.V. Stalin, and other members of the committee had the right to sign operational directive documents (orders). At the same time, it should be noted that the Politburo did not preliminarily consider or approve the decisions of the State Defense Committee, although the Politburo retained the preliminary consideration and approval of draft resolutions of the Central Committee of the All-Union Communist Party of Bolsheviks, joint resolutions of the Council of People's Commissars of the USSR and the Central Committee of the All-Union Communist Party of Bolsheviks, as well as individual decisions of the Secretariat and the Organizing Bureau Party Central Committee.

The decisions and orders of the GKO were not subject to publication - they had the stamp "Top Secret", and individual acts were supplemented with the stamp "Special Importance". Only a few decisions of the State Defense Committee were brought to the attention of the population - they were published in the open press. In total, during the period of activity of the State Defense Committee from June 30, 1941 to September 4, 1945 (1629 days of work), 9971 decrees and orders of the State Defense Committee followed. “They cover all aspects of the state's activities during the war. The content of the documents, as a rule, depended on the evolving military-political situation on the Soviet-German front, in the country and in the world, the military-political and strategic goals of operations, campaigns and the war as a whole, as well as on the state of one's own economy. Decrees and orders of the State Defense Committee after their signing were sent for execution to the people's commissars, first secretaries of the Central Committee of the Communist Parties of the Union republics, regional committees, regional committees

Studying the activities of GKOuntil the early 2000s. was limited by the availability of the source base - the secrecy of the committee's documents, which also limited the possibilities of research. But even at the same time, historians and historians of law, to one degree or another, turned to the history of the State Defense Committee, illuminated, within the limits accessible to them, certain aspects of the activities of the State Defense Committee. In this regard, the studies of N.Ya. Komarov - in 1989, his article “The State Defense Committee Decides ... Some Issues of Organizational Construction and Strengthening of the Combat Soviet Army during the Great Patriotic War” was published in the Military History Journal, which outlined the principled position and highlighted the main aspects of the activities of the GKO. In 1990, his documentary work “The State Defense Committee decides: Documents. Memories. Comments".

Carrying out work on declassifying documents in 1990 - early 2000. provided researchers with access to previously closed archival documents. The latter was reflected in the increased research interest in the study of GKO - there appeared works devoted to his activities, as well as publications of documents. Among them, the work of Yu.A. Gorkova - “The State Defense Committee decides ... (1941-1945). Figures, documents” (2002), based on previously closed materials from the Archive of the President of the Russian Federation, the Central Archive of the Ministry of Defense, personal archives of I.V. Stalin, G.K. Zhukova, A.M. Vasilevsky, A.I. Mikoyan and allowing to understand the range of directions and content of the activities of the State Defense Committee. In 2015, the work of a team of military historians, unique in terms of richness of material and level of analysis, was published - “The State Defense Committee in the system of emergency bodies of the strategic leadership of the country and the armed forces”, included Volume 11 (“Victory Politics and Strategy: Strategic Leadership of the Country and the Armed Forces of the USSR during the War Years”) of the twelve-volumepublications "The Great Patriotic War of 1941-1945" in (M., 2011-2015) . Without dwelling on the characteristics of this publication, we note that the activities of the State Defense Committee for the first time received a systematic scientific study in the context of the functioning of the entire mechanism of party, military, civilian government in the country.

The potential of studying documents on the activities of GKOs is far from being exhausted. At present, the GKO materials are mostly open and are stored in the Russian State Archive of Socio-Political History (formerly the Central Party Archive of the Institute of Marxism-Leninism under the Central Committee of the CPSU) - fund 644. Only 98 decisions and orders of the GKO and partially 3 more documents have not been declassified. . The website of the Federal Archival Agency of the Russian Federation contains lists of GKO documents available to the researcher.

So, the State Defense Committee was formed as an emergency party-state body that headed the system of state administration of the USSR in the conditions of the Great Patriotic War in 1941-1945. The study of his activities was reflected in the studies of historians and historians of law in the 1960s-1990s, devoted to the organization of government in the country under the conditions of the Great Patriotic War, but they were extremely limited in terms of sources - materials on the activities of the State Defense Committee were mostly classified. This limited research capacity to work with documents on the activities of GKOs was overcome in the 2000s. with the removal of the secrecy stamp, which ensured the emergence of new works and created opportunities for recreating both the history of the GKO and the picture of management in the USSR during the Great Patriotic War of 1941-1945. generally.

Bibliography

.

Atomic project of the USSR. Documents and materials in 3 volumes M.-Sarov, 2000. V. 1-3.

.

Arkhipova T.G. The state apparatus of the RSFSR during the Great Patriotic War (1941-1945). M., 1981.

.

Bulletin of declassified documents of federal state archives. M., 2005. Issue. 6. Electronic resource: http://www.rusarchives.ru/secret/bul6/pred.shtml

.

Great Patriotic War 1941-1945 In 12 vols. M., 2015. V. 11. Politics and strategy of Victory: strategic leadership of the country and the Armed Forces of the USSR during the war years. The team of authors.

.

Golotik S.I. State Defense Council // Higher and Central State Institutions of Russia. 1801 - 1917 SPb., 1998. T. 2. Higher state institutions.

.

Gorkov Yu.A. The State Defense Committee decides ... (1941-1945). Numbers, documents. M., 2002.

.

Danilov V.N. The Soviet state in the Great Patriotic War: the phenomenon of emergency authorities in 1941-1945. Saratov, 2002.

.

History of the Great Patriotic War of the Soviet Union. 1941-1945. M., 1960-1965. T. 1-6.

.

History of the Soviet state and law. T. 3. Soviet state and law on the eve and years of the Great Patriotic War (1836-1945). M., 1985.

.

Komarov N. Ya. The State Defense Committee decides ... (Some questions of organizational construction and strengthening of the combat Soviet Army during the Great Patriotic War) // Military History Journal. 1989. No. 3.

.

Komarov N.Ya. The State Defense Committee decides: Documents. Memories. Comments M., 1990.

.

Korneva N.M., Tyutyunnik L.I., Sayet L.Ya., Vitenberg B.M. Special meeting to discuss and unite measures for the defense of the state // Higher and central state institutions of Russia. 1801 - 1917 SPb., 1998. T. 2. Higher state institutions.

State Defense Committee

GKO - created during the Great Patriotic War, an emergency governing body of the country. The need for creation was obvious, since in wartime it was necessary to concentrate all power in the country, both executive and legislative, in one governing body. Stalin and the Politburo actually headed the state and made all decisions. However, the adopted decisions formally came from the Presidium of the Supreme Soviet of the USSR, the Central Committee of the All-Union Communist Party of Bolsheviks, and the Council of People's Commissars of the USSR. In order to eliminate such a method of leadership, which is permissible in peacetime, but does not meet the requirements of the country's martial law, it was decided to create a State Defense Committee, which included some members of the Politburo, secretaries of the Central Committee of the All-Union Communist Party of Bolsheviks and Stalin himself, as chairman of the Council of People's Commissars of the USSR.

The idea of ​​creating a GKO was put forward by L.P. Beria at a meeting in the office of the Chairman of the Council of People's Commissars of the USSR Molotov in the Kremlin, which was also attended by Malenkov, Voroshilov, Mikoyan and Voznesensky. Thus, the State Defense Committee was formed on June 30, 1941 by a joint resolution of the Presidium of the Supreme Soviet of the USSR, the Council of People's Commissars of the USSR and the Central Committee of the CPSU (b). The need to create a State Defense Committee, as the highest governing body, was motivated by the difficult situation at the front, which required that the leadership of the country be centralized to the maximum extent. The aforementioned resolution states that all orders of the State Defense Committee must be unquestioningly carried out by citizens and any authorities.

It was decided to put Stalin at the head of the GKO, in view of his undeniable authority in the country. Having made this decision, Beria, Molotov, Malenkov, Voroshilov, Mikoyan and Voznesensky, on the afternoon of June 30, headed for the "Near Dacha".

Stalin did not make a speech on the radio in the first days of the war, as he understood that his speech could even more give rise to anxiety and panic among people. The fact is that he very rarely spoke publicly, on the radio. In the pre-war years, this happened only a few times: in 1936 - 1 time, in 1937 - 2 times, in 1938 - 1, in 1939 - 1, in 1940 - not a single one, until July 3, 1941 - not a single one. .

Until June 28 inclusive, Stalin worked intensively in his Kremlin office and daily received a large number of visitors; on the night of June 28-29, he had Beria and Mikoyan, who left the office at about 1 a.m. After that, the entries in the visit log cease and for June 29-30 are completely absent, which shows that Stalin did not receive anyone in his office in the Kremlin these days.

Having received on June 29 the first and still vague information about the fall of Minsk that had taken place the day before, he visited the People's Commissariat of Defense, where he had a difficult scene with G.K. Zhukov. After that, Stalin went to the "Near Dacha" and locked himself there, not receiving anyone and not answering the phone. In this state, he remained until the evening of June 30, when (at about 5 p.m.) a delegation (Molotov, Beria, Malenkov, Voroshilov, Mikoyan and Voznesensky) came to him.

These leaders informed Stalin about the created government body and offered him to become chairman of the State Defense Committee, to which Stalin gave his consent. There, on the spot, powers were distributed among the members of the State Defense Committee.

The composition of the GKO was as follows: Chairman of the GKO - I. V. Stalin; Deputy Chairman of the GKO - V. M. Molotov. Members of the GKO: L.P. Beria (since May 16, 1944 - Deputy Chairman of the GKO); K. E. Voroshilov; G. M. MALENKOV.

The composition of the GKO was changed three times (the changes were legally formalized by the decisions of the Presidium of the Supreme Council):

- On February 3, 1942, N. A. Voznesensky (at that time Chairman of the State Planning Committee of the USSR) and A. I. Mikoyan became members of the State Defense Committee;

- On November 22, 1944, N.A. Bulganin became a new member of the GKO, and K.E. Voroshilov was removed from the GKO.

The vast majority of GKO resolutions dealt with topics related to the war:

- evacuation of the population and industry (during the first period of the Great Patriotic War);

- mobilization of industry, production of weapons and ammunition;

– handling captured weapons and ammunition;

- study and export to the USSR of captured samples of equipment, industrial equipment, reparations (at the final stage of the war);

- organization of hostilities, distribution of weapons, etc.;

– appointment of authorized GKOs;

- the beginning of "works on uranium" (the creation of nuclear weapons);

- Structural changes in the GKO itself.

The vast majority of GKO resolutions were classified as "Secret", "Top Secret" or "Top Secret/Special Importance".

Some decisions were open and published in the press - GKO Decree No. 813 of 10/19/41 on the introduction of a state of siege in Moscow.

The State Defense Committee supervised all military and economic issues during the war. The leadership of the fighting was carried out through the Headquarters.

On September 4, 1945, the State Defense Committee was abolished by the Decree of the Presidium of the Supreme Soviet of the USSR.

This text is an introductory piece. From the author's book

The Thomson Committee On April 10, 1940, members of the Thomson Committee met in the old Victorian building of the Royal Society in London. This government-subsidized body was established to deal with the military applications of atomic energy. Gentlemen! -

From the author's book

"Committee for Relief" "Free Lawyers" first of all created the so-called "Committee for Assistance to Prisoners of the Soviet Zone". In the spring of 1951, Erdman called a meeting of the members of this committee. Speaking at the meeting, he emphasized the "charitable" nature of the committee. With help

From the author's book

Territorial defense battalions (BTO) Prior to the events in Donbass, there was no such thing as territorial defense troops in the concept of Ukraine's military doctrine. Initially, it was assumed that these formations could be created in the event of natural or

From the author's book

Committee for the Independence of Chechnya Something like an underground group around Said-Khasan Abumuslimov (in 1974-81 - a student of the Faculty of History of Moscow State University, in 1982-84 - a graduate student of the Faculty of Law or Economics) really existed - but rather in the 80s than in 70s.

From the author's book

EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE What was created on February 27 in the Taurida Palace under the name of the Executive Committee of the Soviet of Workers' Deputies had, in essence, little in common with this name. The Soviet of Workers' Deputies of 1905, the ancestor of the system, grew out of the general strike. He

From the author's book

MILITARY REVOLUTIONARY COMMITTEE Despite the turning point that began at the end of July, the Socialist-Revolutionaries and Mensheviks still dominated the renewed Petrograd garrison during August. Some military units remained infected with a sharp distrust of the Bolsheviks. The proletariat is not

From the author's book

THE LAST LINE OF DEFENSE We accidentally ran into an old acquaintance and began to remember when we saw each other for the last time. Either twenty years ago, or twenty-five. Well, yes - at Vitalka's birthday party! They remembered - and the joy of the meeting evaporated. Because after that day

From the author's book

I. From Defense to Offensive L. Trotsky. THE SITUATION ON THE FRONTS (Speech at a meeting of the All-Russian Central Executive Committee on September 30, 1918) The general situation on our fronts can be considered quite satisfactory. If we consider it in some

From the author's book

YURI GORKOV STATE DEFENSE COMMITTEE

From the author's book

POLYGON No. 2 OF THE MINISTRY OF DEFENSE To test the atomic bomb, it was necessary to find on the territory of the USSR a deserted and without agricultural land area with a diameter of about 200 km. Moreover, this area was supposed to be located no further than 200 km from the railway line and

From the author's book

The Executive Committee and Terror My general impression is that the Soviet government has already gone through a period of internal struggle and is devoting all its strength to constructive work, insofar as this is possible in a war on all fronts. It also seems to me that

From the author's book

76. TO THE MAIN CENSORSHIP COMMITTEE January 16, 1827 To the Main Censorship Committee of Collegiate Assessor Baron Delvig Petition On behalf of the retired ensign Yevgeny Abramovich Baratynsky, intending to publish the attached manuscript under the title

From the author's book

98. TO THE PETERSBURG CENSORSHIP COMMITTEE December 10, 1829 St. Petersburg. December 10, 1829 To the St. Petersburg Censorship Committee of Collegiate Assessor Baron Anton Antonovich Delvig, I have a desire from the beginning of the next 1830 to publish here, in St. Petersburg, a Literary newspaper on

From the author's book

Conscience Control Committee Recently, the United Nations Committee on the Rights of the Child devoted an entire report to the Catholic Church. The tone of this report reminded the Europeans of the verdicts of the revolutionary tribunal of the time of Robespierre, and to us - the political campaigns of the "cult of personality" era. Committee

From the author's book

COMMITTEE OF MEMORY October 3, Tuesday. Start at 12.00. Procession from the tram circle to ASK-3 (Ostankino). Laying flowers and an Orthodox memorial service at the place of execution. October 4, Wednesday. Start at 16.30. A rally on the square near the Ulitsa 1905 Goda metro station. Duration - 1 hour. Procession

State Defense Committee

GKO - created during the Great Patriotic War, an emergency governing body of the country. The need for creation was obvious, since in wartime it was necessary to concentrate all power in the country, both executive and legislative, in one governing body. Stalin and the Politburo actually headed the state and made all decisions. However, the adopted decisions formally came from the Presidium of the Supreme Soviet of the USSR, the Central Committee of the All-Union Communist Party of Bolsheviks, and the Council of People's Commissars of the USSR. In order to eliminate such a method of leadership, which is permissible in peacetime, but does not meet the requirements of the country's martial law, it was decided to create a State Defense Committee, which included some members of the Politburo, secretaries of the Central Committee of the All-Union Communist Party of Bolsheviks and Stalin himself, as chairman of the Council of People's Commissars of the USSR.

The idea of ​​creating a GKO was put forward by L.P. Beria at a meeting in the office of the Chairman of the Council of People's Commissars of the USSR Molotov in the Kremlin, which was also attended by Malenkov, Voroshilov, Mikoyan and Voznesensky. Thus, the State Defense Committee was formed on June 30, 1941 by a joint resolution of the Presidium of the Supreme Soviet of the USSR, the Council of People's Commissars of the USSR and the Central Committee of the CPSU (b). The need to create a State Defense Committee, as the highest governing body, was motivated by the difficult situation at the front, which required that the leadership of the country be centralized to the maximum extent. The aforementioned resolution states that all orders of the State Defense Committee must be unquestioningly carried out by citizens and any authorities.

It was decided to put Stalin at the head of the GKO, in view of his undeniable authority in the country. Having made this decision, Beria, Molotov, Malenkov, Voroshilov, Mikoyan and Voznesensky, on the afternoon of June 30, headed for the "Near Dacha".

Stalin did not make a speech on the radio in the first days of the war, as he understood that his speech could even more give rise to anxiety and panic among people. The fact is that he very rarely spoke publicly, on the radio. In the pre-war years, this happened only a few times: in 1936 - 1 time, in 1937 - 2 times, in 1938 - 1, in 1939 - 1, in 1940 - not a single one, until July 3, 1941 - not a single one. .

Until June 28 inclusive, Stalin worked intensively in his Kremlin office and daily received a large number of visitors; on the night of June 28-29, he had Beria and Mikoyan, who left the office at about 1 a.m. After that, the entries in the visit log cease and for June 29-30 are completely absent, which shows that Stalin did not receive anyone in his office in the Kremlin these days.

Having received on June 29 the first and still vague information about the fall of Minsk that had taken place the day before, he visited the People's Commissariat of Defense, where he had a difficult scene with G.K. Zhukov. After that, Stalin went to the "Near Dacha" and locked himself there, not receiving anyone and not answering the phone. In this state, he remained until the evening of June 30, when (at about 5 p.m.) a delegation (Molotov, Beria, Malenkov, Voroshilov, Mikoyan and Voznesensky) came to him.

These leaders informed Stalin about the created government body and offered him to become chairman of the State Defense Committee, to which Stalin gave his consent. There, on the spot, powers were distributed among the members of the State Defense Committee.

The composition of the GKO was as follows: Chairman of the GKO - I. V. Stalin; Deputy Chairman of the GKO - V. M. Molotov. Members of the GKO: L.P. Beria (since May 16, 1944 - Deputy Chairman of the GKO); K. E. Voroshilov; G. M. MALENKOV.

The composition of the GKO was changed three times (the changes were legally formalized by the decisions of the Presidium of the Supreme Council):

- On February 3, 1942, N. A. Voznesensky (at that time Chairman of the State Planning Committee of the USSR) and A. I. Mikoyan became members of the State Defense Committee;

- On November 22, 1944, N.A. Bulganin became a new member of the GKO, and K.E. Voroshilov was removed from the GKO.

The vast majority of GKO resolutions dealt with topics related to the war:

- evacuation of the population and industry (during the first period of the Great Patriotic War);

- mobilization of industry, production of weapons and ammunition;

– handling captured weapons and ammunition;

- study and export to the USSR of captured samples of equipment, industrial equipment, reparations (at the final stage of the war);

- organization of hostilities, distribution of weapons, etc.;

– appointment of authorized GKOs;

- the beginning of "works on uranium" (the creation of nuclear weapons);

- Structural changes in the GKO itself.

The vast majority of GKO resolutions were classified as "Secret", "Top Secret" or "Top Secret/Special Importance".

Some decisions were open and published in the press - GKO Decree No. 813 of 10/19/41 on the introduction of a state of siege in Moscow.

The State Defense Committee supervised all military and economic issues during the war. The leadership of the fighting was carried out through the Headquarters.

On September 4, 1945, the State Defense Committee was abolished by the Decree of the Presidium of the Supreme Soviet of the USSR.


| |

Introduction

State Defense Committee (abbreviated GKO) - an emergency governing body created during the Great Patriotic War, which had full power in the USSR. The need for creation was obvious, because. in wartime, it was required to concentrate all power in the country, both executive and legislative, in one governing body. Stalin and the Politburo actually headed the state and made all decisions. However, the adopted decisions formally came from the Presidium of the Supreme Soviet of the USSR, the Central Committee of the All-Union Communist Party of Bolsheviks, the Council of People's Commissars of the USSR, etc. In order to eliminate such a method of leadership, which is permissible in peacetime, but does not meet the requirements of the military situation of the country, it was decided to create a State Defense Committee, which included some members of the Politburo, secretaries of the Central Committee of the All-Union Communist Party of Bolsheviks and Stalin himself, as chairman of the Council of People's Commissars of the USSR.

1. Formation of GKO

The State Defense Committee was formed on June 30, 1941, by a joint resolution of the Presidium of the Supreme Soviet of the USSR, the Council of People's Commissars of the USSR, and the Central Committee of the All-Union Communist Party of Bolsheviks. The need to create a State Defense Committee, as the highest governing body, was motivated by the difficult situation at the front, which required that the leadership of the country be centralized to the maximum extent. The aforementioned resolution states that all orders of the State Defense Committee must be unquestioningly carried out by citizens and any authorities.

The idea of ​​creating a GKO was put forward by L.P. Beria at a meeting in Molotov's office in the Kremlin, which was also attended by Malenkov, Voroshilov, Mikoyan and Voznesensky. need attribution It was decided to put Stalin at the head of the GKO, in view of his undeniable authority in the country. need attribution Having made this decision, the six in the afternoon (after 4 o’clock) went to the Middle Dacha, where they persuaded Stalin to again assume the functions of the head of state and distributed duties in the newly created committee need attribution. . (for details see: Stalin June 29-30, 1941).

2. Composition of GKO

Initially (on the basis of a joint Decree of the Presidium of the Supreme Soviet of the USSR, the Council of People's Commissars and the Central Committee of the All-Union Communist Party of Bolsheviks of June 30, 1941, see below), the composition of the GKO was as follows:

    Chairman of the GKO - I. V. Stalin.

    Deputy Chairman of the GKO - V. M. Molotov.

GKO members:

    K. E. Voroshilov.

      On February 3, 1942, N. A. Voznesensky (at that time Chairman of the State Planning Committee of the USSR) and A. I. Mikoyan became members of the GKO;

      On November 22, 1944, N. A. Bulganin became a new member of the GKO, and K. E. Voroshilov was removed from the GKO.

    3. GKO resolutions

    The first GKO decree (“On the organization of the production of T-34 medium tanks at the Krasnoye Sormovo plant”) was issued on July 1, 1941, the last one (No. ”) - September 4, 1945. The numbering of the decisions was kept through.

    Of the 9,971 resolutions and orders adopted by the State Defense Committee during its work, 98 documents remain completely classified and three more partially (they relate mainly to the production of chemical weapons and the atomic problem).

    Most of the decisions of the GKO were signed by its chairman, Stalin, some also by deputy Molotov and GKO members Mikoyan and Beria.

    The State Defense Committee did not have its own apparatus, its decisions were prepared in the relevant people's commissariats and departments, and office work was carried out by the Special Sector of the Central Committee of the All-Union Communist Party of Bolsheviks.

    The vast majority of GKO resolutions were classified as “Secret”, “Top Secret” or “Top Secret / Special Importance” (the designation “s”, “ss” and “ss / s” after the number), but some resolutions were open and published in the press (an example of such a resolution is the Decree of the State Defense Committee No. 813 of 10/19/41 on the introduction of a state of siege in Moscow).

    The vast majority of GKO resolutions dealt with topics related to the war:

      evacuation of the population and industry (during the first period of the Great Patriotic War);

      mobilization of industry, production of weapons and ammunition;

      handling captured weapons and ammunition;

      study and export to the USSR of captured samples of equipment, industrial equipment, reparations (at the final stage of the war);

      organization of hostilities, distribution of weapons, etc.;

      appointment of authorized GKOs;

      about the beginning of "works on uranium" (the creation of nuclear weapons);

      structural changes in the GKO itself.

    4. Structure of GKO

    The GKO included several structural divisions. Over the period of its existence, the structure of the Committee has changed several times, with the aim of maximizing management efficiency and adapting to current conditions.

    The most important subdivision was the Operations Bureau, created on December 8, 1942 by GKO resolution No. 2615s. The bureau included L.P. Beria, G. M. Malenkov, A. I. Mikoyan and V. M. Molotov. The actual head of the Operational Bureau was Beria. The tasks of this unit initially included monitoring and monitoring the current work of all the people's commissariats of the defense industry, the people's commissariats of communications, ferrous and non-ferrous metallurgy, power plants, the oil, coal and chemical industries, as well as the preparation and execution of plans for the production and supply of these industries and transport with everything you need. On May 19, 1944, Decree No. 5931 was adopted, by which the functions of the bureau were significantly expanded - now its tasks included monitoring and controlling the work of the people's commissariats of the defense industry, transport, metallurgy, people's commissariats of the most important areas of industry and power plants; from that moment on, the Operations Bureau was also responsible for supplying the army, and finally, it was entrusted with the duties of the abolished by the decision of the Transport Committee.

    Other important divisions of the GKO were:

      Trophy Commission (established in December 1941, and on April 5, 1943, by Decree No. 3123ss, it was transformed into the Trophy Committee);

      Special Committee - established on August 20, 1945 (GKO Decree No. 9887ss / op). Engaged in the development of nuclear weapons.

      Special Committee (dealt with issues of reparations).

      Evacuation Committee (created on June 25, 1941 by GKO Decree No. 834, disbanded on December 25, 1941 by GKO Decree No. 1066ss). On September 26, 1941, by GKO Decree No. 715s, the Administration for the Evacuation of the Population was organized under this committee.

      The Committee for Unloading Railways - was formed on December 25, 1941 by GKO Decree No. 1066ss, on September 14, 1942, by GKO Decree No. 1279, it was transformed into the Transport Committee under the State Defense Committee, which existed until May 19, 1944, after which, by GKO Decree No. 5931, the Transport Committee was abolished, and its functions were transferred to the GKO Operational Bureau;

      Radar Council - established on July 4, 1943 by GKO Decree No. 3686ss, consisting of: Malenkov (chairman), Arkhipov, Berg, Golovanov, Gorokhov, Danilov, Kabanov, Kobzarev, Stogov, Terentyev, Ucher, Shakhurin, Shchukin.

      A group of permanent commissioners of the GKO and permanent commissions of the GKO at the fronts.

    5. GKO functions

    The State Defense Committee supervised all military and economic issues during the war. The leadership of the fighting was carried out through the Headquarters.

    6. Dissolution of GKO

    The State Defense Committee was disbanded by the Decree of the Presidium of the Supreme Soviet of the USSR of September 4, 1945.

    7. Additional information in Wikisource

    Bibliography:

      R. A. Medvedev. IV Stalin in the first days of the Great Patriotic War. New and Contemporary History, No. 2, 2002

      Konstantin Pleshakov. Stalin's mistake. The first 10 days of the war. Per. from English. A. K. Efremova. M., "Eksmo", 2006 ISBN 5-699-11788-1 pp. 293-304

      Guslyarov E. (ed.) Stalin in life. M., Olma-Press, 2003 ISBN 5-94850-034-9

      1941 The documents. in 2 vols. M., Democracy, 1998 p.498 ISBN 5-89511-003-7

      Kumanev G. Next to Stalin. Smolensk, Rusich, 2001, pp. 31-34. ISBN 5-8138-0191-X

      Khrushchev N. S. Memoirs. Time, people, power. In 3 vols. M., Moscow news, 1999. T.1., p. 301

      Jover W. Secrets of the life and death of Stalin. - "Le Nouvel Observateur": 2006-06-28. (Interview with English historian Simon Seabeg Montefiore)

      Scientific conference "N.A.Voznesensky: his era and modernity". Archives of Russia