Protectionist policies and

Mercantilism. Financial

Reform

The accelerated pace of development of Russian industry required the development of trade. In the theoretical works of F. Saltykov (“Propositions”), I. Pososhkov (“The Book of Poverty and Wealth”), Russian economic thought was further developed, the theory of mercantilism, which provided for the economic policy of the state, aimed at attracting as much money as possible to the country through the export of goods. With such an unprecedented scale of construction of various manufactories, money was constantly needed. Moreover, the money had to be kept in the country. In this regard, Peter I creates conditions for encouraging domestic producers. Industrial, commercial companies, agricultural workers are given various privileges so that the export of products exceeds the import. He imposed high duties on imported goods (37%), In order to develop domestic trade, he adopted a special document on fairs.

In 1698, the construction of the Volga-Don Canal began, which was supposed to connect the largest water arteries of Russia and contribute to the expansion of domestic trade. The Vyshnevolotsky canal was built, which connected the Caspian and the Baltic through the rivers.

In the first quarter of the XVIII century. branches expanded not only in the field of industry, but also in the field of agriculture. New agricultural crops were imported into Russia, the development of which led to the creation of viticulture, tobacco growing, the breeding of new breeds of livestock, medicinal herbs, potatoes, tomatoes, etc. d.

At the same time, the encouragement of state-owned industry and trade led to the restriction of "unspecified" trade by landowners and peasants, which prevented the free development of market relations in the Petrine era. The management of industry and trade was carried out by the Berg Manufactory College and the Commerce College.

The continuous growth of government spending on the development of industry, military needs determined the financial policy. Financial functions were carried out by three institutions: the Chamber College was engaged in the collection of income, the Staff Office College - the distribution of funds, the Audit College - controlled the first two institutions, that is, collection and distribution.

In accordance with the requirements of the time and the search for funds, the Russian Tsar strengthened the state monopoly on a number of goods: tobacco, salt, fur, caviar, resin, etc. By decree of Peter I, special persons - the staff of profiteers - looked for new, most diverse sources of income. Taxes were imposed on windows, pipes, doors, frames, duties were set for mooring and mooring, for places in bazaars, etc. In total, there were up to 40 such taxes. In addition, direct taxes were introduced on the purchase of horses, on provisions for the fleet, etc. In order to replenishment of the treasury was carried out monetary reform.

Ever since the end of the 17th century. the restructuring of the monetary system of Russia began. A new monetary system was created, reducing the weight of the coin, replacing small silver coins with copper ones, and degrading the fineness of silver. As a result of the financial reform, coins of various denominations appeared: copper ruble, half a ruble, half a half, hryvnia, kopeck, money, polushka, etc. Gold (single, double chervonets, two-rouble coins) and silver coins (hryvnia, piglet, penny, altyn, kopeck) were also preserved. Gold chervonets and silver rubles became hard convertible currencies.

The reform had both positive and negative consequences. Firstly, it led to significant state revenues, replenished the treasury. If in 1700 the Russian treasury totaled 2.5 million rubles, then in 1703 - 4.4 million rubles. And, secondly, monetary transactions caused a fall in the ruble exchange rate and a 2-fold increase in prices for goods.

Social politics

Publications, 11:00 08/06/2019

Merchants under Peter I: privileges, subsidies and regulation with corruption

The transformation of Russia into an absolutist state changed the class composition of the population. The number of representatives of trade professions increased especially noticeably. Merchants became for the king the most important source of development of the country, but this only led to the restriction of their rights and opportunities.

Alexander Minzhurenko, Candidate of Historical Sciences, deputy of the State Duma of the first convocation, tells about the consequences of numerous reforms of Peter I for the merchant class in the sixth episode of his investigation.

Russia's transition to the stage of absolutism introduced significant changes in the legal status of all social strata of Russian society without exception. The radical reforms of Peter I affected various spheres of life. The rights of the merchants were also seriously revised.

On the one hand, Peter I supported the merchants as the creators of the country's new economy, provided them with great help and assistance, protecting and expanding their rights and privileges. But on the other hand, this reformer thought first of all about the expansion and strengthening of the state. And to create an absolutist state, a colossal bureaucratic machine with a large number of officials and a constant large regular army and navy were required.

The formation and maintenance of two new pillars of the absolute monarchy required gigantic funds in volumes that the treasury of previous periods could not even dream of. And everyone paid for the creation of this new state: the peasants, who received a burdensome soul tax with a mass of new taxes, and the clergy, who, according to the priests, were simply “robbed” by the Antichrist Tsar, and the aristocracy, and the wealthy merchants.

However, the “robbery” of the merchants was carried out by Peter I prudently and with the understanding that merchants are a chicken that regularly lays golden eggs. And therefore, she had to help in every possible way in this process of continuous reproduction of money. And Peter I, with all his indefatigable energy and scope, begins not only to support the merchants in their pursuits, but also very persistently pushes them to new types of activity. Forced from merchants with the assistance of the state, a class of industrialists-entrepreneurs is formed.

Actually, even before Peter the Great, merchants were engaged not only in purely trade. Quite often they founded crafts and manufactories. It is known how merchants rose in the extraction of salt, ores and other minerals. They were also engaged in the processing of raw materials. Trade for many future industrialists was a stage of initial accumulation of capital. And it was natural.

So, in many cases, Peter did not wait for that very, in his opinion, slow accumulation of start-up capital, but began to allocate it to merchants almost by force, literally forcing them to engage in a new business. Subsidies and privileges fell on the merchant-industrialists as if from a cornucopia. Peter urgently needed to create a trade and Navy, for which copper, a sailcloth and much more were needed.

The acute need for money forced Peter I to use internal trade as the most important source of state revenue. Trade was subject to various new taxes, which could not but restrain its turnover.

In addition, wanting to extract the maximum profit for the treasury from trade, Peter I declared the sale of part of the goods on the domestic market a state monopoly. This category included salt, tobacco and other goods, the trade in which was often farmed out to individual merchants, monasteries, or carried out directly by state institutions.

The Petrine era is known primarily for the desire of the state to regulate economic, social and even private life. The royal decree of January 16, 1721 also determined the legal status of the merchant class. By this document, the entire urban population, with the exception of foreigners, nobles, clergy and "mean people" was divided into two guilds. The corporations of the guests, the trading people of the living room and the cloth hundreds were liquidated.

The first guild included large merchants, bankers, skippers of merchant ships. The second guild included the middle merchants, merchants of petty goods and "food supplies", as well as artisans.

But this decree not only drew new social and legal boundaries between persons of different levels of wealth: it seriously affected the interests of the merchants, in fact, infringing on their exclusive rights to engage in trade. The decree eliminated the monopoly of the merchants on trade, which they had enjoyed since the time of the Council Code of 1649. Trade was now allowed to be carried out by persons of "every rank", with the exception of the military.

Competitors merchants spawned and Peter's Decree on the same heritage of 1714. The tsar was worried about the fragmentation of landlord estates during the change of generations and forbade them to be divided among his sons. From now on, all land ownership upon the death of the owner could only go entirely to the eldest of the brothers. The younger sons of noble families were directly recommended to engage in trading activities.

Of course, various subsidies and direct state financing of trade and entrepreneurship contributed to the revival and growth of the economy as a whole. But such an active direct intervention of the state into the economic life of the country with the infusion of huge amounts of state money into it inevitably led to an unprecedented increase in corruption, nepotism and embezzlement.

The rules of free fair competition were often violated, and many respectable merchants who were not included in government programs could not compete with trading establishments that were patronized by the government. And many of the highest government officials themselves rushed into trade and production, hastily creating enterprises with state money.

So, Prince Alexander Menshikov built a sailing factory on Klyazma, and other closest associates of Peter I (Apraksin, Tolstoy, Shafirov) established a silk company. She received huge subsidies from the state and the right to sell her goods duty-free for 50 years, as well as freedom from taxes, standing and other privileges.

The protectionist tariff of 1724 also hit the interests and rights of many Russian merchants. This was done in order to create favorable conditions for the emergence and development of new domestic industries - manufacturing enterprises.

Protecting such industries, the government set extremely high and even prohibitive duties on the import of such foreign goods. If the usual import duties amounted to 10-20%, reaching up to 30-40%, then protective duties increased to 50-75% of the value of the imported goods. This affected the interests of those Russian merchants who mainly traded in these groups of goods. And they complained about the infringement of their interests and rights, that they were placed in unequal conditions with other merchants.

At the same time, Peter I created the most favorable conditions for merchants involved in the export of Russian products and products. In most cases, goods exported from the country were subject to a low (up to 3%) duty. And if Russian merchants exported goods on their own ships, the duty was reduced by a factor of three.

Frankly copying the Western European experience, Peter began to cobble together various companies from scattered entrepreneurs (“in the manner of the East Indian.”) These companies were financed by the treasury and were under strict control of the state. Trading companies did not take root in Russia during the reign of Peter I. Merchants preferred to trade separately from each other, through their clerks.

Thus, the period of Peter the Great's reforms was accompanied by a kind of "nationalization" of trading activity and its strict regulation. The king sought to subordinate everything in the country to the interests of the state. From here, many merchants experienced both the patronage of the government and many of the restrictions imposed by it.

However, not all spheres of trade fell into the field of view of Peter I, so medium and small merchants freely traded in traditional goods. For them, the regulation of trading activities by the state was expressed in most cases in the bribery of civil servants. Large merchants also suffered from corruption, and on a large scale.

Peter himself, knowing about the widespread vice and the massive violation of the rights of merchants, resolutely fought against this evil, but he failed to create an effective system for protecting the rights of the merchants.

It is difficult to disagree with the well-known historian Immanuel Wallerstein, who argued that the Muscovite state (at least until 1689) should undoubtedly be placed outside the framework of "European Europe". Fernand Braudel, author of the brilliant monograph Time of the World (Librairie Armand Colin, Paris, 1979; Russian edition M., Progress, 1992), quite agreeing with Wallerstein, nevertheless argues that Moscow has never been absolutely closed to the European economy, even before the conquest of Narva or before the first British settlements in Arkhangelsk (1553 - 1555)

Europe strongly influenced the East with the superiority of its monetary system, the attractiveness and temptations of technology and goods, with all its power.

But if the Turkish Empire, for example, diligently kept aloof from this influence, then Moscow gradually pulled itself towards the West.

To open a window to the Baltic, to allow the new English Moscow company to settle in Arkhangelsk - this meant an unambiguous step towards Europe.

However, the truce with the Swedes, signed on August 5, 1583, closed Russia's only exit to the Baltic and retained only the inconvenient Arkhangelsk port on the White Sea. Thus, access to Europe was difficult.

The Swedes, however, did not prohibit the passage of goods imported or exported by Russians through Narva.

Exchanges with Europe also continued through Revel and Riga. Their positive balance for Russia was paid in gold and silver.

The Dutch, importers of Russian grain and hemp, brought sacks of coins containing between 400 and 1000 riksdaler each (the official coin of the Netherlands after the Estates General of 1579). In 1650, 2755 bags were delivered to Riga, in 1651. - 2145, in 1652 - 2012 bags. In 1683, trade through Riga gave Russia a positive balance of 832,928 riksdaler.

Russia remained semi-closed in itself not because it was allegedly cut off from Europe or opposed to exchanges. The reasons were rather in the moderate interest of the Russians in the West, in the unsteady political balance of Russia.

To some extent, the experience of Moscow is akin to the experience of Japan, but with the big difference that the latter, after 1638, closed itself to the world economy through a political decision.

Turkey was the main foreign market for Russia in the 16th and early 17th centuries. The Black Sea belonged to the Turks and was well guarded by them, and therefore, at the end of the trade routes that passed through the Don valley and the Sea of Azov, goods were reloaded exclusively on Turkish ships. Equestrian messengers regularly ran between Crimea and Moscow.

The capture of the lower reaches of the Volga (the capture of Kazan and Astrakhan in the middle of the 16th century) opened the way to the south, although the waterway passed through weakly peaceful areas and remained dangerous.

However, Russian merchants created river caravans, uniting in large detachments.

Kazan and, to an even greater extent, Astrakhan became the checkpoints of Russian trade heading to the Lower Volga, Central Asia, China and Iran. Trade trips captured Qazvin, Shiraz, the island of Ormuz (which took three months to reach from Moscow).

The Russian fleet, created in Astrakhan during the second half of the 16th century, actively operated in the Caspian. Other trade routes led to Tashkent, Samarkand and Bukhara, all the way to Tobolsk, which was then the frontier of the Siberian East.

Although we do not have exact figures expressing the volume of Russian trade exchange between the southeast and west, the prevailing role of the markets of the South and East seems obvious.

Russia exported raw hides, furs, hardware, coarse linen, iron products, weapons, wax, honey, food products, plus re-exported European products: Flemish and English cloth, paper, glass, and metals.

To Russia from the eastern states spices, Chinese and Indian silks in transit through Iran; Persian velvets and brocades; Turkey supplied sugar, dried fruits, gold items and pearls; Central Asia provided inexpensive cotton products.

It appears that Eastern trade has been positive for Russia. In any case, this applies to state monopolies (ie, to some part of the exchanges). This means that trade relations with the East stimulated the Russian economy. The West, on the other hand, demanded only raw materials from Russia, and supplied them with luxury goods and minted coins.

And the East did not disdain ready-made products, and if luxury goods made up some part of the commodity flow going to Russia, then along with them were dyes and many cheap consumer goods.

Send your good work in the knowledge base is simple. Use the form below

Students, graduate students, young scientists who use the knowledge base in their studies and work will be very grateful to you.

With content

Introduction

1. The state and development of Russian industry under Peter 1

2. Reform of the management system under Peter 1

3. Domestic and foreign trade under Peter 1

4. Changes in the financial system under Peter 1

5. Military reform of Peter 1

Conclusion

Bibliography

Introduction

This essay will consider the topic: "Russia under Peter 1".

During the reign of Peter 1, Russia turned into a great power with an efficient economy, powerful army and navy, highly developed science and culture. All these achievements would be very desirable to see in modern Russia.

Russia's advance was swift and decisive. Peter maintained vigor in his like-minded people, faith in success, he was in a hurry to have time to do a lot, and it is not without reason that the Petrine era is called “Young Russia”. But all these transformations often took place through violence, through the suffering of the people, through a sharp break in the customs, habits, psychology of people, through extremism, intolerance, unwillingness to reckon with the internal conditions for reforms. The planting of the new went through a fierce struggle with the old. Despite the fact that Peter was a supporter of the Western path of development and Western rationalism, he carried out his reforms in an Asian way.

It should also be emphasized that in his attempts to get closer to Western European civilization, introducing everything advanced and useful, Peter forgot about the originality of Russia, about its dual Eurasian essence. He believed that all the origins of her backwardness lie in Asian roots. Striving for Europe, Peter often adopted only the external forms of progressive ideas, ignoring the inner essence of centuries-old traditions.

And yet, the significance of the great changes in the life of Russia, carried out in the era of Peter the Great, can hardly be overestimated.

1. State and r industrial development Russia under Peter 1

Undoubtedly, the young tsar's determination to start cardinal reforms was influenced by failures in the war with Sweden and Turkey for access to the Baltic and Black Seas. Military failures showed, first of all, the backwardness of domestic metallurgy. Indeed, until the very beginning of the 18th century, Russia imported, mainly from Sweden, iron, copper, tin, and weapons. The war in the Baltics stopped these supplies, so the development of our own metallurgical production became a strategic problem.

The government made great efforts to build iron-making manufactories at the expense of the treasury in the Urals and in the Olonets region. The first decade of the 18th century can be characterized as a period of active state intervention in the economy and encouragement of private enterprise. The transfer of state-owned enterprises, especially unprofitable ones, to private "particular" owners, foreigners or commercial and industrial companies - the merchants - has become a common phenomenon. The state assumed the costs of training workers, supplied equipment, and sent specialists to these enterprises. For especially important industries, various privileges were given, soft loans, free land plots for the construction of new factories.

It should be emphasized that these emergency measures played a decisive role in creating a powerful material base for the army, which made it possible to defeat Sweden in the Northern War. As a result, Russia gained access to the Baltic Sea and returned its lands, which had long been part of the Novgorod principality. In 1703, the city of St. Petersburg was founded, which in 1713 became the new capital of Russia. Isaev I.A. History of the state and law of Russia: Proc. for universities on special and the direction of Jurisprudence” / Mosk. state legal acad. - M.: Jurist, 1998. - S.235.

The first manufactories appeared in Russia as early as the 17th century, but they did not play a significant role in the economy at that time. It was from the 18th century that the manufacturing period began in the national economy, since the manufacturing system became predominant in comparison with handicraft production. Since the 17th century, manufactories in Russia began to be called Western - "factories", although, as you know, factories were based on a system of various machines and freelance labor, which were almost non-existent in Russia at that time.

Since there were almost no free workers in the country, the main problem in organizing manufactories was to provide them with hired labor. If in the first years of the 18th century it was still possible to find free (“walking”, runaway) people who did not fall into serfdom, then later, when the process of enslavement intensified and the search for runaway peasants became more strict, the number of “staggering” people sharply decreased in the country . The government increased the scale of forced labor, when entire villages and villages were assigned to enterprises, at first only for the autumn-winter period, and then for good. Zuev M.N. History of Russia from ancient times to the end of the twentieth century. Tutorial. - M.: Bustard, 2002. - S.218.

In addition to state-owned and patrimonial, possession-based, or conditional, manufactories began to appear (lat. Possessio - conditional possession). Since 1721, by decree of Peter I, it was allowed to buy serfs to non-nobles (merchants, rich townspeople from among artisans). In this case, the peasants were assigned to the enterprise and constituted a single whole. These peasants could no longer be sold separately; such manufactories were bought and sold only under certain conditions. The activities of the owners of possession manufactories were monitored by the state. These owners were subsequently exempted from compulsory civil service, had tax and customs privileges. Dispersed manufactories also continued to develop, which arose on the basis of merchant capital and tied domestic peasant production to commercial and industrial capital.

In the first quarter of the 18th century, there was a noticeable increase in manufactory production. And if in late XVII century, there were about 20 manufactories in the country, then in the mid-1720s there were already 205 manufactories and large enterprises of a handicraft type, among which 90 belonged to the treasury and 115 to private capital. There were especially many metallurgical enterprises: 52 - in ferrous metallurgy, 17 - in non-ferrous metallurgy, which were mainly located in the Urals and Tula. On the shores of Lake Onega in 1703, an iron foundry and ironworks were built, which laid the foundation for the city of Petrozavodsk. In addition, in the 1720s there were 18 sawmills, 17 gunpowder factories, 15 cloth factories, 11 leather factories, as well as enterprises for the production of glass, porcelain, paper, etc. Livshits A.Ya. Economic reform in Russia and its price. - M.: Prospekt, 2001. - P. 111.

The transformation of the Urals into the largest world center of metallurgy was a notable economic event in Russia at that time. In 1699, on the initiative of Peter, ironworks were built on the Neva River, which, since 1702, were transferred to the former Tula blacksmith Nikita Demidov. The Ural factories of the Demidovs and other entrepreneurs were at the advanced technical level, even by European criteria. The products of metallurgical plants were of high quality, they began to export them to Europe, and soon Russia came out on top in Europe in the production of pig iron. If in 1700 150 thousand poods were produced, then in 1725 - about 800 thousand poods of cast iron (1 pood = 16 kg).

In order to provide metallurgical production with raw materials, the search for various natural resources was strongly encouraged in the country. All lucky "miners" for the discovery of new deposits were supposed to be generously paid. In 1700, the Ore Order was created, later renamed the Berg Collegium, which was in charge of not only metallurgical production, but also geological exploration. To encourage search natural resources, the government announced the principle of "mining freedom", according to which anyone could develop subsoil for a small fee in favor of the state or a private owner of the land.

In addition to large manufactories, the Russian economy still had a large handicraft sector in the cities, as well as home crafts in the countryside as an integral part of the natural feudal estate, although these manufacturers were increasingly dependent on market relations in the person of buyers of products. Urban and rural artisans produced fabrics, leather and felted shoes, pottery, saddles, harness and other products. In the 18th century, craft specialties appeared associated with the new way of life brought from Europe by Peter I: braiders, snuff makers, watchmakers, carriage makers, hat makers, hairdressers, bookbinders, etc. Zuev M.N. History of Russia from ancient times to the end of the twentieth century. Tutorial. - M.: Bustard, 2002. -

Under Peter I, an attempt was made to put small handicraft production under state control. So, in 1722, by decree of the king, artisans were to join the workshops. Foremen were elected in the shops, who monitored the quality of products, the procedure for admission to the shop organization. Apprentices had to master the craft for seven years to become an apprentice, and those, in turn, could become masters no earlier than two years later. True, these guild organizations did not have that strict regulation of the production and marketing of products that existed in medieval Europe, and in general this system did not have such a distribution as in the West.

2. Management reform under Peter 1

Peter I sought to carry out internal transformations in Russia in order to bring it to the European level. In addition to military and diplomatic problems, he deeply delved into all issues of the Russian government controlled. For 25 years - from 1700 to 1725 - he adopted almost three thousand different laws and decrees concerning the economic, civil, domestic aspects of the life of the population, including the administrative structures of the state. As well as reforms in industrial production, the reform of the system of state and local government was associated primarily with the military needs of the country. In the first years of his reign, the young king dealt with these issues occasionally, in a hurry. And only in the last seven or eight years of his reign, thanks to his efforts, the activities of all administrative institutions received a regulatory framework and were regulated according to a certain system.

Radical comprehensive reforms in the field of government were due to the need to strengthen the absolute monarchy. First of all, it was necessary to create a harmonious administrative vertical, completely subordinate to the supreme authority. This was aimed at a radical reorganization of the entire structure of public administration from top to bottom. Kargalov V.V., Saveliev Yu.S., Fedorov V.A. History of Russia from ancient times to 1917. - M.:

The main object of the reorganization was the Boyar Duma, which constantly interfered in the affairs of Peter's predecessors and which no longer corresponded to the regime of absolute monarchy. In 1699, instead of the Boyar Duma, Peter established the Closest Office of eight trusted persons to assist in solving state affairs, which he called the Council of Ministers.

In 1711, he also abolished this structure, creating a governing Senate of nine people appointed by himself. It was the highest state body with legislative, administrative and judicial power. In January 1722, new positions of Prosecutor General and Chief Prosecutor of the Senate were established to oversee the activities of the Senate.

The emperor became the head of state power. This title was granted to Peter by the Senate in 1721 after the victorious end of the Northern War with Sweden, and Russia was proclaimed an empire. From now on, Peter and his heirs began to have unlimited power, the right to introduce strict regulation in management, ideology, social life, and culture.

Peter I spent a lot of time reforming the obsolete order system. In 1717-1718, almost the entire numerous, complex, confusing unsystematic "crowd" of orders was replaced by collegiums - new governing bodies. Unlike orders, which, as a rule, had regional competence, collegiums had nationwide powers, which in itself created a higher level of centralization. In total, eleven collegia were created: the Military Collegium was in charge of the army, the Admiralty Collegium was in charge of the fleet, the Justice Collegium was in charge of legislation, the Manufactory Collegium was in charge of industry, etc. Later, the rights of the college were endowed with the Holy Synod, which led church affairs, as well as the Chief Magistrate, who was in charge of city affairs. Kargalov V.V., Saveliev Yu.S., Fedorov V.A. History of Russia from ancient times to 1917. - M.:

The boards were created according to the Swedish model, but taking into account Russian conditions. Each of them included a president, vice president, advisers, assistants, secretary. The president of the board, as a rule, was Russian, and the vice president was a foreigner. The work in the colleges was clearly organized, in contrast to the ordered confusion and confusion. Peter sincerely hoped that the collegiate system would not carry the old vices: arbitrariness, abuse, red tape, bribery. But the king's hopes were not destined to come true, because in the conditions of the incredible strengthening of the role of the bureaucracy, the scale of these vices only grew.

In 1708-1710, a provincial reform was carried out, according to which the whole country was divided into eight provinces: Moscow, Ingermanland (St. Petersburg), Kyiv, Smolensk, Kazan, Azov, Arkhangelsk, Siberia. Provinces, in turn, were divided into counties. In the hands of the governor were concentrated administrative, judicial, police, financial functions, in accordance with which taxes were collected, recruited, search for fugitive peasants, court cases were considered, and food was provided to the troops.

Subsequently, Peter repeatedly returned to the problem of reorganizing local government. In 1719, the second provincial reform was carried out, the number of provinces increased to eleven, the provinces were divided into 50 provinces, which were directly subordinate to the colleges and the Senate. In accordance with the reform, the power of the governor extended only to the province of the provincial city, and in the rest of the provinces, voivodes were in power, who were subordinate to the governors in military and judicial matters.

Simultaneously with the provincial reform, it was also planned to carry out the urban reform. Peter wanted to give the cities full self-government so that they could choose burgomasters there. However, in contrast to Western Europe, Russian cities of the early 18th century had not yet formed a rich and influential bourgeoisie that could take over city government. In 1720, the Chief Magistrate was established in St. Petersburg, who was supposed to lead the urban estates in Russia. Reader on the history of the state and law of Russia. / Ed. Chibiryaeva S.A. - M.: Bylina, 2000.

It should be noted that the administrative system created in the course of Peter the Great's reforms turned out to be very strong. In general terms, it was preserved (with some changes) until 1917. The management structure, the mechanism of power and its functions remained unshakable for almost two centuries.

Peter's reforms were undoubtedly directed against the old boyar aristocracy, which did not want change and the strengthening of a strong centralized power. At the same time, Peter relied on the local nobility, which, being a more progressive young estate, supported the course towards strengthening the absolute monarchy. In order to provide economic support to the nobility, in 1714 Peter issued a Decree on Uniform Succession, according to which the two forms of feudal landed property (patrimonies and estates) were finally merged into a single legal concept - “immovable property”. Both types of farms were equalized in all respects, the estate also became a hereditary, and not a conditional farm, they could not be divided between heirs. Estates were inherited only by one of the sons, usually the eldest. The remaining children received an inheritance in money and other property, they were required to enter the military or civil (civilian) service.

This Decree closely adjoined the introduction in 1722 of the Table of Ranks. According to this Table, all positions of the state and military service were divided into 14 classes-ranks from the lowest - the fourteenth, to the highest - the first. In accordance with the Table, employees from among the nobility or burghers were required to pass these steps in order to be promoted. This document introduced the principle of length of service and finally eliminated the previously canceled principle of parochialism, which still tacitly existed in the country. The most interested in the introduction of this order were the nobles, who could now rise to the highest state ranks, really join the power. Pavlenko N.I. Peter the Great. - M.: Knowledge, 1990. - P.72.

It is appropriate to recall that under Peter the nobility were not the privileged class that it became in the second half of the 18th century. They were still service people who were in the public service. If in pre-Petrine times the nobles returned home after military campaigns, then under Peter they had to enter the university from the age of 15. regular regiments, go through a long soldier's service "from the foundation" and only after that get an officer's rank and serve in the army until old age or disability. On the other hand, every soldier who rose to the rank of officer received hereditary nobility.

In addition to service duty, academic duty was also assigned to the nobles. Hundreds of young nobles had to study military or naval affairs in Russia or abroad. All male noble children were required to learn literacy, tsifiri (arithmetic) and geometry, otherwise they were not allowed to marry. Reader on the history of the state and law of Russia. / Ed. Chibiryaeva S.A. - M.: Bylina, 2000. - S.289.

A distinctive feature of the Russian autocracy in pre-Petrine times was the complete fusion of church and state. While in Western Europe the church was moving further and further away from state administration, in Russia in the 17th century there was a so-called churched state. The king himself acted both as the supreme ruler of the church and as the head of state; religious ideas were the main ones in secular life.

Peter I destroyed this tradition and carried out a church reform, completely subordinating the church to the state. After the death of the head of the Russian Orthodox Church, Patriarch Andrian, in 1700, the patriarchate was abolished (which was restored only after the February Revolution of 1917). In 1721, the Holy Synod was established - a special "spiritual board" to manage the affairs of the church. At the head of the Holy Synod was the chief procurator, a secular person, usually from guards officers. All members of the Synod were appointed by the Tsar himself. The economic rights of the church were noticeably limited, its huge land plots were cut, part of its income began to be withdrawn to the state budget. Pushkarev S. G. Review of Russian history. - M.: Jurist, 2002. - P.158.

Beginning with Peter I, the state began to interfere in religious life, followed the obligatory communion of all Orthodox. Through the Synod, the secrecy of confession was abolished, the priests were obliged to report to the Privy Office about the confessions of parishioners made during confession, if they concerned the interests of the state. From now on, the Church was obliged in all worldly affairs to obey the orders of secular authorities.

3. Domestic and foreign trade under Peter 1

To maintain and streamline the domestic market in 1719, the College of Commerce was created. Later, the Main and city magistrates were established, whose functions included all kinds of assistance to the merchants, their self-government, and the creation of guilds.

In order to improve trade routes, the government for the first time in the history of the country began the construction of canals. So, in 1703-1709, the Vyshnevolotsky canal was built, the construction of the Mariinsky water system, the Ladoga (1718) canal, completed shortly after the death of Peter, the Volga-Don (1698) canal, the construction of which was completed only in 1952, began. Land roads were very bad, during the period of rains and mudslides they became impassable, which, of course, hindered the development of regular trade relations. In addition, there were still many internal customs duties in the country, which also held back the growth of the all-Russian market.

It should be noted that the development of domestic trade was held back by "money hunger", the country still experienced an acute shortage of monetary metals. The money turnover consisted mainly of small copper coins. The silver kopeck was a very large monetary unit, often it was chopped into several parts, each of which made an independent turnover.

In 1704, Peter I began a monetary reform. Silver ruble coins began to be issued, or simply rubles, which until Peter the Great remained only a conditional counting unit (the ruble did not exist as a coin). The silver thaler was taken as a weight unit of the ruble, although the silver content in the ruble was less than in the thaler. A portrait of Peter I, a double-headed eagle, the year of issue and the inscription "Tsar Peter Alekseevich" were stamped on the ruble. Kolomiets A. G. History of the fatherland. - M.: BEK, 2002. - S.326.

The new monetary system was based on a very simple and rational decimal principle: 1 ruble \u003d 10 hryvnias \u003d 100 kopecks. By the way, many Western countries came to such a system much later. Fifty kopecks were issued - 50 kopecks, half-fifty kopecks - 25 kopecks, nickels - 5 kopecks. Later, altyn - 3 kopecks and five-altyn - 15 kopecks were added to them. The minting of coins became a strict and unconditional monopoly of the state, a ban was announced on the export of precious metals abroad. Pushkarev S.G. Review of Russian history. - M.: Jurist, 2002. - P.161. In the same period, the search for domestic silver deposits in Transbaikalia, in the Nerchinsk region, was crowned with success. The strengthening of the monetary system was also facilitated by an increase in exports and a positive foreign trade balance.

Under Peter I, gold coins were also issued: Caesar's rubles and chervonets. The first of them were often used as a military award to the lower ranks - soldiers, while the ruble was hung like a medal around the neck. Chervonets, on the other hand, mainly served foreign trade turnover and had almost no circulation inside the country.

Initially, the Peter's ruble was quite valuable and was equal to 8 1/3 spools of pure silver (1 spool = 4.3 g). Later, as a result of negative economic changes in the country, the ruble gradually "lost weight", first to 5 5/6, and then to 4 spools. Kolomiets A.G. The history of homeland. - M.: BEK, 2002. - S.327.

Peter's reforms also affected foreign trade, which began to actively develop due, first of all, to access to the Baltic Sea. The purposeful policy of mercantilism pursued by the government contributed to the strengthening of the foreign trade orientation of the Russian economy. One of the ideologists of mercantilism was the Russian thinker-economist I.T. Pososhkov, who in 1724 published The Book of Poverty and Wealth. In it, he emphasized that the country needed to create technically advanced enterprises based on domestic raw materials in order to be able to confidently enter the foreign market.

Supporters of mercantilism believed that the country should achieve an active foreign trade balance, i.e. excess of income from the export of goods over the costs of importing goods into the country. For example, in 1726, export from Russia through the main seaports - St. Petersburg, Arkhangelsk, Riga - amounted to 4.2 million rubles, and import - 2.1 million.

An obligatory element of mercantilism is the establishment of strict customs barriers to protect domestic producers from foreign competitors. So, in 1724, a customs tariff was established, according to which a duty of up to 75% of their value was established on the import of such foreign goods as iron, canvas, silk fabrics in order to stimulate their production in their own country. Up to 50% duty was set on Dutch linen, velvet, silver and other goods, up to 25% - on those goods that were produced in Russia in insufficient quantities: woolen fabrics, writing paper, up to 10% - on copper utensils, window glass, etc. .d.

High export duties were imposed on raw materials necessary for domestic entrepreneurs so that they would not leave the country. The state kept basically all foreign trade in its hands through monopoly trading companies and farming out. The main currency used in foreign circulation was still the silver thaler (yefimok). Pushkarev S. G. Review of Russian history. - M.: Jurist, 2002. - P.160.

Significant changes also took place in the structure of foreign trade. If at the beginning of the 18th century mainly agricultural products and raw materials were exported, then by the mid-1720s, manufacturing products began to occupy a larger share: Ural iron from the Demidov factories, linen, ropes, canvas. In imports, as before, the largest volume was occupied by luxury goods for members of the royal family and nobles, as well as colonial goods: tea, coffee, spices, sugar, wines. Thanks to the energetic actions of Peter, Russia from 1712 for the first time in history stopped buying weapons in Europe.

During the first decades of the 18th century, the geography of Russian foreign trade centers also changed. If in the 17th century Arkhangelsk played the main role in trade with the West, then St. Petersburg soon took its place, and later - Riga, Revel (Tallinn), Vyborg, Narva. Trade relations with Persia and India were conducted along the Volga through Astrakhan and the Caspian Sea, with China - through Kyakhta. Kolomiets A.G. The history of homeland. - M.: BEK, 2002. - S.328.

4. Changes in the financial system under Peter 1

The northern war with Sweden, the southern campaigns to the Sea of Azov, the construction of the fleet, manufactories, canals, cities constantly demanded huge government spending. The Russian budget was in critical condition. The task was set to find all new tax revenues. Specially authorized people - profitmakers - were sent in search of new objects of taxation. Starting from 1704, one after another, an endless series of new taxes was established: mill, bee, cellar, bath, pipe - from stoves, homute, cap, shoe, icebreaking, watering, from schismatics, cabbies, inns, from beards, sales of edibles, sharpening knives and other "petty all sorts of fees."

State monopolies were added to the new taxes. In addition to resin, potash, rhubarb, glue, new monopoly goods were added: salt, tobacco, chalk, tar, fish oil, lard, oak coffins. Fishing became an object of ransom, wine was sold only in state-owned taverns.

The main income came from direct taxes, which were imposed only on the "vile" estates. At the end of Peter's reign, many petty fees were abolished. And in order to increase state revenues, instead of the household tax that existed since 1679, in 1718-1724, a poll tax was introduced from the revision soul, which was paid not only from a working man, but also from boys, old people and even those who died, but were still listed in revision lists. The landlord peasants paid 74 kopecks a year for the benefit of the treasury, plus an additional 40-50 kopecks to their landowner, and the state peasants paid 1 ruble 14 kopecks a year only to the treasury. Karamzin N. M. Traditions of the centuries. - M.: Knowledge, 1988. - P.133.

For a more accurate record of the country began to conduct a census of the male population every 20 years. Based on the results of the censuses, revision tales (lists) were compiled. During the census, the number of serfs increased, since former bonded serfs, who had previously received freedom after the death of their master, were equated to this category.

In addition, the black-mowed peasants of the northern regions, the plowed peasants of Siberia, the peoples of the middle Volga region, who had not previously paid taxes, because they were not serfs, were taxed. Single palaces were added to them, i.e. former service people (gunners, archers), previously exempt from taxes. The poll tax was now also required to be paid by the townspeople - townspeople, philistines.

Various estates sought all sorts of privileges in order to be exempt from paying taxes. The collection of taxes was always carried out with great difficulty, with huge arrears, since the solvency of the population was very low. So, in 1732, arrears amounted to 15 million rubles, which was twice the amount of income.

The main source of state budget revenue, as already mentioned, was direct taxes from the population - up to 55.5% in 1724. In addition, as in the 17th century, indirect taxes and a system of ransoms for the sale of monopoly goods, as well as ransoms for the construction of mills, bridges, etc., played an important role. Various in-kind duties became widespread, such as recruiting, stationing (apartment) and underwater, in accordance with which the peasants had to provide the military units that stood up with food and fodder grain. State peasants were also obliged to perform various kinds of work in favor of the state: to transport mail and allocate carts for carts, to take part in the construction of canals, harbors, roads. Karamzin N. M. Traditions of the centuries. - M.: Knowledge, 1988. - P.134.

A special role in replenishing the revenues of the treasury was played by manipulations with small copper coins. So, for example, the market price of one pood of copper was 7 rubles, but at the beginning of the 18th century copper money was minted from this mass for 12 rubles, and by 1718 - for 40 rubles. The huge difference between the market price of copper and the face value of a copper coin led to their endless illegal fakes - "thieves' money", rising prices and depreciation of money, impoverishment of the population.

The main budget item was military spending. So, for example, the military campaigns of Peter I absorbed approximately 80-85% of all income in Russia, and in 1705 they cost 96%. During the period of Peter's reforms systematically

expenditures on the state apparatus, on the construction of St. Petersburg and the palaces around it, on various ceremonial events on the occasion of military victories - “victory”, magnificent festivities, etc. also state loans, especially after the death of Peter I.

In order to streamline and strictly centralize the financial system in 1719-1721, the highest state bodies were created: the College of Chambers - to manage the country's revenues, the Staff College - to manage expenses, the Revision College - to control the financial system as a whole. All this was done in opposition to the previous system, when each order had its own sources of income. Karamzin N. M. Traditions of the centuries. - M.: Knowledge, 1988. - P.135.

5. Military reform Petra 1

One of the most significant transformations of Peter I should be called the military reform, which made it possible to bring the Russian army closer to the European standards of that time.

At the end of the 17th century, Peter I disbanded the streltsy troops not so much because of their military incompetence, but for political reasons, since the streltsy in their mass supported the forces opposed to Peter. As a result, the king was left without an army. The regiments hastily formed in 1699-1700 under the leadership of foreign officers in the battles near Narva showed a complete inability to resist the Swedes. With the help of his comrades-in-arms in the "amusing troops", Peter energetically set about recruiting and training a new army. And already in 1708-1709, she showed herself at the level of the armies of any European country.

First of all, the former principle of the formation of an army by random soldiers from walkers, hunters, dependent people, etc. was canceled. For the first time in Russia, a regular army was created on the basis of recruitment duty, which was established from 1705. In total, until 1725, 53 recruits were carried out, according to which more than 280 thousand people were mobilized into the army and navy. Initially, one recruit from 20 households was taken into the army, and from 1724 they began to be recruited in accordance with the principles underlying the poll tax. Recruits underwent military training, received uniforms, weapons, while until the 18th century, soldiers - both nobles and peasants - had to come to the service in full gear. Gumilyov L. N. From Russia to Russia. Essays on Russian history. - M.: Logos, 1999. - S.244.

Peter I almost did not use the principle of a mercenary army from among foreigners, which was widespread in Europe. He preferred the national armed forces. Interestingly, the following rule was established regarding recruits: if a recruit was from serfs, he automatically became free, and then his children, born after liberation, also became free.

The Russian field army consisted of infantry, grenadier, cavalry regiments. The emperor paid special attention to two regiments - Preobrazhensky and Semenovsky, created by Peter in Moscow in his youth, during the struggle for the throne, and later transformed into a palace guard. All nobles had to bear military service from the soldier's rank. So, according to the decree of 1714, it was forbidden to promote to officers those nobles who had not completed military service in the guards regiments, which not all noble children liked. The most capable young nobles were sent to study (especially maritime affairs) abroad.

The training of officers was carried out in military schools founded in 1698-1699 - Bombardier (artillery) and Preobrazhenskaya (infantry). By decree of Peter in the early 1720s, 50 garrison schools were founded to train non-commissioned officers. Timoshina T.M. Economic History of Russia: Textbook / Ed. prof. M.N. Chepurin. -8th ed. Ster. - M.: Legal House "Justitsinform", 2002. - P.80.

Peter I paid special attention to the fleet. At the end of the 17th century, ships were being built in Voronezh and Arkhangelsk. In 1704, the Admiralty and shipyards were founded in St. Petersburg, where the construction of ships of the navy moved. At the Admiralty shipyard, where at the same time

up to 10 thousand people worked, from 1706 to 1725 about 60 large and more than 200 small ships were built for the Baltic Fleet. Sailors for the fleet were also recruited by recruitment. By the mid-1720s, the navy consisted of 48 battleships and about 800 galleys and other vessels, on which about 28 thousand crew members served. In 1701, the School of Mathematical and Navigational Sciences was founded in Moscow, located in the famous Sukharev Tower, where naval officers were trained. Timoshina T.M. Decree. op. - P.81.

Conclusion

It is very difficult to evaluate all the transformations of Peter I. These reforms are of a very contradictory nature, they cannot be given an unambiguous assessment. The most important thing is that for the first time after the baptism of Russia, Peter I made an energetic attempt to bring the country closer to European civilization.

Peter I constantly emphasized that Russia should no longer remain closed to world economic processes if it did not want to continue to lag behind in socio-economic development and gradually fall into heavy colonial dependence on advanced Western countries, as happened with many Asian states that failed to end traditionalism. As a result of Peter's reforms, Russia managed to take its rightful place in the system of European states. It has become a great power with an efficient economy, powerful army and navy, highly developed science and culture.

Carrying out reforms in Russia, Peter strove for an ideal state based on fair and rational laws, but this turned out to be a utopia. In practice, a police state was created in the country without any institutions of social control.

Adopting advanced technologies, scientific, military and other achievements in the West, Peter did not seem to notice the development of the ideas of humanism there, all the more not wanting to introduce them to Russian soil. It was under Peter that the serfdom of the peasants intensified, due to which the tsar's reform activities were mainly carried out, since there were almost no other sources of economic growth in the country. The hardships of the reforms that fell on the shoulders of the peasants and the urban population were more than once the causes of major popular uprisings in Central Russia, the Volga region, Ukraine and the Don, for example, the uprising of the Cossacks led by Kondraty Bulavin in 1707-1708, brutally suppressed by the tsarist authorities .

Listliterature

Gumilyov L.N. From Russia to Russia. Essays on Russian history. - M.: Logos, 1999. - 674 p.

Zuev M.N. History of Russia from ancient times to the end of the twentieth century. Tutorial. - M.: Bustard, 2002. - 896s.

Isaev I.A. History of the State and Law of Russia: Proc. for universities on special and direction "Jurisprudence" / Mosk. state legal acad. - M.: Jurist, 1998. - 768s.

Karamzin N.M. Traditions of the Ages. - M.: Knowledge, 1988. - 659s.

Kargalov V.V., Saveliev Yu.S., Fedorov V.A. History of Russia from ancient times to 1917. - M.: Russian word, 2001. - 577p.

Klyuchevsky V.O. New Russian history. Lecture course. - M., 1888. - 542s.

Kolomiets A.G. The history of homeland. - M.: BEK, 2002. - 745s.

Livshchits A.Ya. Economic reform in Russia and its price. - M.: Prospect, 2001.- 432s.

Pavlenko N.I. Peter the Great. - M.: Knowledge, 1990. - 304 p.

Platonov S.F. Lectures on Russian history. - M.: Higher school, 2001. - 600s.

Pushkarev SG. Review of Russian history. - M.: Jurist, 2002. - 642 p.

Smirnov I.I. Political history of Russia. - M.: Os-89, 1999. - 318s.

Timoshina T.M. Economic History of Russia: Textbook / Ed. Prof. M.N. Chepurin.-8th ed. Ster. - M.: Legal House "Yusticinform", 2002. - 416s.

Reader on the history of the state and law of Russia. / Ed. Chibiryaeva S.A. - M: Bylina, 2000. - 524 p.

§ 4. Trade

Internal trade based on the geographical division of labor relied heavily on the grain trade. At the beginning of the XVIII century. the main grain flow was connected with Moscow and the Moscow region. Grain products, hemp, hemp oil, honey, lard, skins, etc. were delivered here from the nearest Black Earth region along the Oka and the Moscow River. The flow of grain through Nizhny Novgorod and the Vyshnevolotsk Canal rushed to St. Petersburg. Bread from the Volga region went to the central provinces. Hemp, wool, lard and other livestock products, as well as wax, potash, saltpeter were brought from Ukraine to the center of the country.

The internal trade of the Petrine era, as in the 17th century, consisted of several levels. Its lowest level is rural and county auctions. where one, less often two or three times a week, the peasantry, small local merchants, gathered. And the highest level of trade is the wholesale trade of large merchants. Fairs were its main conductors. The most important of them in the first quarter of the XVIII century. - this is the Makarievskaya Fair near Nizhny Novgorod and the Svenskaya Fair near the walls of the Svensky Monastery near Bryansk.

Of course, along with them, there was a huge network of small fair trade throughout Russia. However, the saturation of trade operations in certain areas was different. The most saturated was the huge region of the Industrial Center of Russia.

An indirect indicator of the intensity of the movement of goods can be the size of the annual amounts of customs payments, since under Peter I an extensive network of internal customs continued to operate. According to the data for 1724–1726, among the inner provinces, the Moscow province had the largest amount of fees (141.7 thousand rubles), which far exceeded the fees in other areas. In the Nizhny Novgorod province, the collection was equal to 40 thousand rubles, in the Sevsk province - 30.1 thousand rubles, in the Yaroslavl province - 27.7 thousand rubles. Next come the Novgorod province (17.5 thousand rubles), Kaluga (16.5 thousand rubles). Simbirskaya (13.8 thousand rubles). Orlovskaya (13.7 thousand rubles). Smolensk (12.9 thousand rubles) and Kazan (11 thousand rubles) (our calculation. - L. M.). In other Russian provinces, the intensity of trade turnover is generally 2–3 times weaker (3–6 thousand rubles in customs duties).

For the development of trade, Peter I undertakes the construction of a number of canals that unite the waterways of different river basins. So, in 1703-1708. The Vyshnevolotsky Canal was built in the 1920s. The basins of the Oka and Don rivers were connected through Ivanovskoye Lake, the projects of the Tikhvin and Mariinsky canals were completed, and the construction of the Volga-Don Canal began. True, the last construction stalled, but a defensive line was built that blocked the way for the Nogai hordes to raid the Russian villages of the Volga region.

Foreign trade began to play a huge role in the Russian economy of the Petrine era. Until 1719, the port of Arkhangelsk had an annual turnover of 2 million 942 thousand rubles. (of which export is 74.5%). By 1726, the turnover of the St. Petersburg port reached 3 million 953 thousand rubles. (export about 60%). True, the turnover of Arkhangelsk had fallen by this time by about 12 times.

Astrakhan was the traditional center of trade with the countries of the East. In the mid 20s. 18th century the customs annual fee here reached 47.7 thousand rubles. If you name the amount of such a fee for St. Petersburg (218.8 thousand rubles), it will become clear that the turnover of the Astrakhan port was four times less. But at the same time, up to 44.2 thousand rubles were paid here alone in "fish duties", which is almost as good as the customs fee and emphasizes the enormous role of the Astrakhan fisheries.

Of particular note is the growing role of the port of Riga, the annual turnover of which in the mid-20s. was over 2 million rubles. (the amount of customs fees is 143.3 thousand rubles). After St. Petersburg, it became the most important center of Russia's foreign trade, opening the way to the European market for the vast southwestern region of the country. Large quantities of such bulky goods (unfavorable in land trade) as hemp, flax, canvas, leather, lard, honey, wax, grain, etc. went abroad through the Western Dvina. Indeed, in those days, the trade route along the Dnieper was a dead end only because of the Dnieper rapids, but also because of the hostility of neighboring states. However, in the Left-bank Ukraine there were a number of cities that had foreign bargaining through Greek merchants who settled there and local merchants (Kyiv, Nizhyn, Chernihiv, etc.).

On the Baltic coast, Russia began to use such ports as Revel (customs duty 15.7 thousand rubles), Narva (10.4 thousand rubles), Vyborg (13.9 thousand rubles).

Treasury goods and trade monopolies. Foreign trade played a very significant role in the revenues of the treasury. Under Peter I, the number of goods traded only by the treasury increased markedly. This is not only caviar, fish glue, rhubarb, tar, potash, but also hemp, linseed and hemp seeds, tobacco, yuft, chalk, salt, tar, torn and pickled lard, cowhide, bristles, fish oil, etc. Merchants, when they could, they bought the right to trade this or that commodity from the treasury and became monopolists. Not infrequently the tsar himself handed out such monopoly rights. So, AD Menshikov had a monopoly on the export of tar, seal skins and Arkhangelsk fish products. Since 1719, the list of state-owned goods began to decline rapidly. In case of crop failure, the state forbade the export of grain abroad (it is true that grain trade was still very small). The export of Ukrainian saltpeter was banned.

Already during the construction of large manufactories, Peter I sought to protect young entrepreneurship, by separate decrees he prohibited the import of certain products from abroad. The ban on the import of metal needles followed immediately after the construction of the needle factory by the Ryumins and I. Tomilin. As soon as the Russian production of linen, silk products and stockings was established, the import of these goods from abroad was immediately banned. In the interests of the domestic cloth industry, the export of wool was banned. The patronizing policy towards Russian industrialists (coinciding with the principles of mercantilism) ended with the creation of the Customs Tariff of 1724. This most interesting piece of legislation was a very flexible instrument of trade and industrial policy. He put a strong barrier against the penetration of even high-quality products of Western countries, if the domestic industry fully satisfied domestic demand (the duty in this case was 75%).

This tariff, of course, did not meet the needs of the nobility, who were interested in foreign goods, and the merchants also wanted other tariffs. In 1731, a different tariff was adopted, which did not have such a pronounced protective character.

From the book History of Ancient Greece author Andreev Yury Viktorovich

4. Trade A fairly populous population of trade and craft policies with its diverse needs, which are growing more and more as urban life becomes more complex, lack of grain and various types of raw materials for crafts, on the one hand, surpluses of wine and oil, stocks

From the book A Short Course in Russian History author Klyuchevsky Vasily Osipovich

XI. Trade From the underdevelopment of the arts and crafts and from the predominance of the original industry, one can already conclude what items of trade the country put on the market and what it itself needed: it put agricultural products, furs and raw products in general, needed

author Kovalev Sergey Ivanovich

Trade The gradual separation of handicrafts from agriculture, which can be traced throughout the first four centuries of Roman history, is inextricably linked with the development of domestic trade. A professional craftsman usually sold his products himself.

From the book History of Rome (with illustrations) author Kovalev Sergey Ivanovich

Trade The growth of local production against the backdrop of a general improvement in the situation of the provinces, the development of transport, the increase in the safety of communications, and so on. led in the era of the Empire to a significant revival of Italo-provincial and interprovincial trade. In the 1st century

From the book History of Russia from the beginning of the XVIII to the end of the XIX century author Bokhanov Alexander Nikolaevich

§ 4. Trade Domestic trade, based on the geographical division of labor, relied heavily on grain trade. At the beginning of the XVIII century. the main grain flow was connected with Moscow and the Moscow region. Along the Oka and the Moscow River, grain products, hemp, hemp oil,

From the book Ireland. Country history by Neville Peter

TRADE In the 16th century, economic development was hampered by the position of the leaders of the Gaelic clans. This happened because of the financial rent they imposed on merchants who tried to trade with the Gaelic areas. Therefore trade within and outside of Ireland (always small)

From the book "Illustrated History of Ukraine" author Grushevsky Mikhail Sergeevich

15. Trade For the same reasons that made decotr places over the other, over the big cities, trade and trade roads were of great importance. On the Ukrainian land, as we already know, there has long been trade with the Black Sea coastal places, and with the Caspian

From the book History of Denmark the author Paludan Helge

Trade Skone fairs, which in the XIII and XIV centuries. represented an international market for all kinds of goods, in the XV century. limited to the herring trade. The Dutch passed by on their ships, buying grain from Prussia, primarily from Danzig; Prussian merchants

From the book of Galla by Bruno Jean-Louis

TRADE The Gauls are not merchants. They don't have that spirit. They prefer to provide themselves with natural resources or plunder what they themselves cannot produce. At the same time, trading networks were based in Gaul from the Neolithic era. First of all, for transportation to the south

From the book Mayan people author Rus Alberto

Trade Differences in geological, orographic, hydrographic and climatic conditions between individual areas of the Maya region determined a noticeable diversity of natural resources in each of them. Although, in order to satisfy their elementary needs, the peoples of this

From the book Mayan people author Rus Alberto

Trade Often, ethnographers describe Maya communities as completely or almost completely isolated, as if they were excluded from the life of the country. In fact, the Maya through trade is drawn into the regional economy and, accordingly, into national life. In the Indian markets

author Golubets Nikolay

Trade "Mothers of Ukrainian cities" - Kiev, vyrisshі zmogutnіv up to the level of the capital of the largest European state of the country, is located at such an important trade route "from the Varangians to the Greeks" like the Dnipro with a university of doplivіv. Trade and bula tim chinnik, sho instilled

From the book Great History of Ukraine author Golubets Nikolay

Trade In the world of that, like a viklikan of Khmelnytsky region, the revolutionary praise will calm down, Ukrainian trade will return to normal. By the road to the Baltic piers, and headly Koenigsberg and Danzig, go from Ukraine to the wide world of Syria in exchange for crafts and crafts

From the book World History. Volume 3 Age of Iron author Badak Alexander Nikolaevich

Trade The production of products specially intended for sale was very poorly developed in Homeric society. True, the poems contain mention of individual cases of exchange, for example, the exchange of captives for bulls, weapons, wine. exchange item in

author Kerov Valery Vsevolodovich

4. Trading 4.1. Domestic trade expanded rapidly. The most important factor in the rapid growth of trade was the development of small-scale commodity production, the increase in the agrarian specialization of the regions, and the increase in demand. Peasant trade in craft products and

From the book A Short Course in the History of Russia from Ancient Times to the Beginning of the 21st Century author Kerov Valery Vsevolodovich

5. Trade In the post-reform era, the growth of domestic and foreign trade accelerated. Commodity economy was getting bigger and bigger.5.1. Domestic trade in the 60-90s. increased many times. The most significant was the grain market, which provided a 3-fold increase in

During the reign of Peter 1 foreign trade. Trade in Russia at the end of the 17th - the first quarter of the 18th century

Merchants under Peter I: privileges, subsidies and regulation with corruption

Send your good work in the knowledge base is simple. Use the form below

With content

Introduction

1. The state and development of Russian industry under Peter 1

2. Reform of the management system under Peter 1

3. Domestic and foreign trade under Peter 1

4. Changes in the financial system under Peter 1

5. Military reform of Peter 1

Conclusion

Bibliography

Introduction

1. State and r industrial development Russia under Peter 1

2. Management reform under Peter 1

3. Domestic and foreign trade under Peter 1

4. Changes in the financial system under Peter 1

State monopolies were added to the new taxes. In addition to resin, potash, rhubarb, glue, new monopoly goods were added: salt, tobacco, chalk, tar, fish oil, lard, oak coffins. Fishing became an object of ransom, wine was sold only in state-owned taverns.

5. Military reform Petra 1

One of the most significant transformations of Peter I should be called the military reform, which made it possible to bring the Russian army closer to the European standards of that time.

Peter I paid special attention to the fleet. At the end of the 17th century, ships were being built in Voronezh and Arkhangelsk. In 1704, the Admiralty and shipyards were founded in St. Petersburg, where the construction of ships of the navy moved. At the Admiralty shipyard, where at the same time

Conclusion

Carrying out reforms in Russia, Peter strove for an ideal state based on fair and rational laws, but this turned out to be a utopia. In practice, a police state was created in the country without any institutions of social control.

Listliterature

Gumilyov L.N. From Russia to Russia. Essays on Russian history. - M.: Logos, 1999. - 674 p.

Zuev M.N. History of Russia from ancient times to the end of the twentieth century. Tutorial. - M.: Bustard, 2002. - 896s.

Similar Documents

§ 4. Trade