The era of great reforms in Russia (60s of the XIX century). The era of great reforms in Russia (60s of the XIX century) Reforms of the 60-70s of the 20th century


Alexander II before the coronation and in the first years of his reign.

Alexander II - Emperor of All Russia, the eldest son of Emperor Nikolai Pavlovich and Empress Alexandra Feodorovna, was born in Moscow on April 17, 1818.

It is natural that great value devoted to the upbringing and education of the future monarch. His educators were General Merder (company commander at the school of guards ensigns, who had remarkable pedagogical abilities, “a meek disposition and a rare mind”), M. M. Speransky, E. F. Kankrin. No less significant was the influence of another mentor - famous poet Vasily Andreevich Zhukovsky, head of his class studies. I would like to dwell in more detail on the system of education of Zhukovsky, which provided not only general knowledge of the then accepted extensive set of subjects and four foreign languages, but also purely special knowledge: about the state, its laws, finances, foreign policy and formed a system of worldview. The basic principles of the upbringing of the Tsarevich looked like this:

Where I am? Nature, its laws. In this part of the program, natural science subjects are connected with the idea of ​​"God in nature".

Who am I? The doctrine of man, united by Christian doctrine.

What was I? History, sacred history.

What should I be? Private and public morality.

What am I meant for? Revelation religion, metaphysics, the concept of God and the immortality of the soul.

And at the end (and not at the beginning) law, social history, state economy, statistics arising from everything.

The acquired knowledge was reinforced by numerous travels. He was the first of the royal family to visit (in 1837) Siberia, and the result of this visit was to mitigate the fate of political exiles. Later, while in the Caucasus, the Tsarevich distinguished himself during the attack of the highlanders, for which he was awarded the Order of St. George 4th degree. In 1837, at the request of Nicholas I, he undertook a trip to Europe for educational purposes. He traveled to Switzerland, Austria, Italy and stayed for a long time in Berlin, Weimar, Munich, Vienna, Turin, Florence, Rome and Naples.

A major role in the life of Alexander II was played by a visit to Darmstadt, where he met Princess Maximilian-Wilhelmina-Augusta-Sophia-Maria (born July 27, 1824), the adopted daughter of Louis II, Duke of Hesse, who soon became the wife of the Tsarevich, Grand Duchess Maria Alexandrovna.

From the age of 16, Alexander successfully took part in management affairs, first sporadically, and then systematically. At the age of 26 he became a "full general" and had a fairly professional military training. IN last years reign of Emperor Nicholas and during his travels he repeatedly replaced his father.

Alexander II ascended the throne on February 19, 1855 at the age of 36. He was to go down in history under the name of the Liberator. Already on the day of the coronation, August 26, the new manifesto of the sovereign was marked by a number of favors. Recruitment was suspended for three years, all state arrears, miscalculations, etc., were forgiven; various criminals were released, or at least the punishment was mitigated, including an amnesty for political prisoners - the surviving Decembrists, Petrashevites, participants in the Polish uprising of 1831; Recruitment of minor Jews was canceled, and recruitment between the latter was ordered to be carried out on a general basis; free travel abroad was allowed, etc. But all these measures were only the threshold of those global reforms that marked the reign of Alexander II.

During this period, it was in full swing and took an unfavorable turn. Crimean War, where Russia had to deal with the combined forces of almost all the major European powers. Despite his peacefulness, which was also known in Europe, Alexander expressed his firm determination to continue the struggle and achieve peace, which was soon achieved. Representatives of seven states (Russia, France, Austria, England, Prussia, Sardinia and Turkey) gathered in Paris, and on March 18, 1856, a peace treaty was concluded. The peace of Paris, although not beneficial for Russia, was nevertheless honorable for her in view of such numerous and powerful opponents. However, its disadvantageous side - the limitation of Russian naval forces on the Black Sea - was eliminated during the life of Alexander II.

Reforms of the 60-70s under Alexander II.

The need for reform.

At the end of the Crimean War, many internal shortcomings of the Russian state were revealed. Changes were needed, and the country was looking forward to them. Then the emperor uttered the words that became for a long time the slogan of Russia: "Let her internal improvement be affirmed and improved; let truth and mercy reign in her courts; let the desire for enlightenment and all useful activity develop everywhere and with renewed vigor ..."

In the first place, of course, was the idea of ​​liberating the serfs. In his speech to representatives of the Moscow nobility, Alexander II said: "It is better to cancel it from above than to wait until it is itself canceled from below." There was no other way out, since every year the peasants expressed their dissatisfaction with the existing system more and more. The corvée form of exploitation of the peasant expanded, which caused crisis situations. First of all, the productivity of the labor of the serfs began to decline, as the landowners wanted to produce more products and thereby undermined the strength of the peasant economy. The most far-sighted landowners realized that forced labor was much inferior in productivity to hired labor (For example, a large landowner A.I. Koshelev wrote about this in his article “Hunting more than captivity” in 1847). But hiring workers required considerable expenses from the landowner at a time when serf labor was free. Many landowners tried to introduce new farming systems, apply the latest technology, purchase improved varieties of thoroughbred cattle, and so on. Unfortunately, such measures led them to ruin and, accordingly, to increased exploitation of the peasants. The debts of landowners' estates to credit institutions grew. Further development of the economy on the serf system was impossible. In addition, it, having existed in Russia much longer than in European countries took on a very rigid form.

However, there is another point of view regarding this reform, according to which, by the middle of the 19th century, serfdom was still far from exhausting its capabilities and opposition to the government was very weak. Neither economic nor social catastrophe threatened Russia, but by retaining serfdom, it could drop out of the ranks of the great powers.

The peasant reform entailed the transformation of all aspects of state and public life. A number of measures were envisaged to restructure local government, the judiciary, education and, later, the army. These were really major changes, comparable only to the reforms of Peter I.

Abolition of serfdom.

On January 3, 1857, the first significant step was taken, which served as the beginning of the reform: the creation of the Secret Committee under the direct supervision and chairmanship of the emperor himself. It included: Prince Orlov, Count Lanskoy, Count Bludov, Minister of Finance Brock, Count V.F. Adlerberg, Prince V.A. Dolgorukov, Minister of State Property M.N. Muravyov, Prince P.P. Gagarin, Baron M. A. Korf and Ya. I. Rostovtsev. The purpose of the committee was designated as "discussion of measures to organize the life of the landlord peasants." Thus, the government tried to get initiative from the nobility in resolving this issue. The word "liberation" has not yet been spoken. But the committee acted very sluggishly. More precise actions began to be carried out later.

February 1858. The secret committee was renamed the “Main Committee on the Landlord Peasants Coming Out of Serfdom”, and a year later (March 4, 1859), Editorial Commissions were established under the committee, which reviewed the materials prepared by the provincial committees and drafted a law on the emancipation of the peasants. . There were two opinions here: the majority of the landlords proposed to free the peasants without land at all or with small allotments, while the liberal minority proposed to release them with land for redemption. At first, Alexander II shared the majority's point of view, but then he came to the conclusion that it was necessary to allocate land to the peasants. Historians usually associate such a decision with the strengthening of the peasant movement: the Tsar was afraid of a repetition of the “Pugachevism”. But no less important role was played by the presence in the government of an influential grouping, called the "liberal bureaucracy".

The draft "Regulations on the Peasants" was practically prepared at the end of August 1859, but for some time it was subject to minor corrections and clarifications. In October 1860, the Editorial Commissions, having completed their work, handed over the draft to the Main Committee, where it was discussed again and underwent further changes, but this time in favor of the landowners. On January 28, 1861, the project was submitted for consideration by the last instance - the State Council, which adopted them with some changes, in the sense of reducing the size of the peasant allotment.

Finally, on February 19, 1861, the "Regulations on the peasants who emerged from serfdom", which included 17 legislative acts, were signed by Alexander II. On the same day, the manifesto “On the most merciful granting to serfs of the rights of the state of free rural inhabitants” followed, in which it was proclaimed the release of 22.6 million peasants from serfdom.

The "Regulations" applied to 45 provinces of European Russia, in which there were 112,000 landowners' estates. First of all, it was declared obligatory for the landowner to allocate his former peasants, in addition to the estate land, arable and haymaking in a certain amount. Secondly, it was declared obligatory for the peasants to accept the allotment and keep in their use, for the duties established in favor of the landowner, the secular land allotted to them during the first nine years (until February 19, 1870). After nine years, individual members of the community were given the right both to leave it and to refuse to use field lands and lands if they bought their estate; the society itself also receives the right not to accept for its use such plots that individual peasants refuse. Thirdly, with regard to the size of the peasant allotment and the payments associated with it, according to general rules, it is customary to base on voluntary agreements between landowners and peasants, for which purpose to conclude a charter charter through mediators established by the situation, their congresses and provincial presences for peasant affairs, and in western provinces - and special verification commissions.

The “Regulation”, however, was not limited to the rules for allocating land to the peasants for permanent use, but made it easier for them to buy the allotted plots into their property with the help of a state redemption operation, and the government gave the peasants a certain amount on credit for the land they acquired with payment by installments for 49 years and, giving this amount to the landowner in state interest-bearing papers, he took all further settlements with the peasants upon himself. Upon approval by the government of the redemption transaction, all obligatory relations between the peasants and the landowner were terminated, and the latter entered the category of peasant proprietors.

"Regulations" were gradually extended to the peasants of the palace, appanage, ascribed and state.

But as a result of this, the peasantry remained bound by the community, and the land allocated to it turned out to be clearly insufficient to meet the needs of an ever-growing population. The peasant remained completely dependent on the rural community (the former “world”), which, in turn, was completely controlled by the authorities; personal allotments were transferred to the ownership of peasant societies, which periodically redistributed them “equalizing”.

In the spring and summer of 1861, the peasants, who did not receive, as expected, "full freedom", organized many uprisings. Outrage was caused by such facts as, for example: for two years the peasants remained subordinate to the landowner, were obliged to pay dues and perform corvée, were deprived of a significant part of the land, and those allotments that were given to them as property had to be redeemed from the landowner. During 1861 there were 1860 peasant uprisings. Peasant performances in the village of Bezdna, Kazan province, are considered one of the largest. Subsequently, disappointment with the inconsistency of the reform was growing not only among former serfs: articles by A. Herzen and N. Ogarev in Kolokol, N. Chernyshevsky in Sovremennik.

Land reform.

After the peasant "Regulations" in a number of administrative reforms, one of the most important places is occupied, without any doubt, by the "Regulations on provincial and district zemstvo institutions", which was published on January 1, 1864.

According to the regulation, non-estate elected bodies of local self-government - zemstvos - were introduced. They were elected by all estates for a three-year term and consisted of administrative bodies (county and provincial zemstvo assemblies) and executive bodies (county and provincial zemstvo councils). Elections to zemstvo administrative bodies - meetings of vowels (deputies) - were held on the basis of a property qualification, by curia. The first curia (landowners) consisted of owners of land from 200 to 800 acres or real estate worth from 15,000 rubles. The second curia (city) united the owners of urban industrial and commercial establishments with an annual turnover of at least 6,000 rubles and owners of real estate for at least 2,000 rubles. The elections for the third curia (rural peasant societies) were multistage. Zemstvo assemblies elected executive bodies - zemstvo councils - consisting of a chairman and several members.

Zemstvos were deprived of any political functions, their activities were limited mainly to solving local issues. They were responsible for public education, for public health, for the timely delivery of food, for the quality of roads, for insurance, for veterinary care, and much more.

All this required a lot of money, so the zemstvos were allowed to introduce new taxes, impose duties on the population, and form zemstvo capitals. With its full development, zemstvo activity was supposed to cover all aspects of local life. New forms of local self-government not only made it all-class, but also expanded the range of its powers. Self-government was so widespread that many were understood as a transition to a representative form of government, so the government soon became noticeable desire to keep the activities of zemstvos at the local level, and not allow zemstvo corporations to communicate with each other.

In the late 1970s, zemstvos were introduced into 35 out of 59 Russian provinces.

urban reform(in continuation of the zemstvo).

On June 16, 1870, the "City Regulations" were published, according to which elective self-government was introduced in 509 out of 1130 cities - city dumas elected for four years. The city duma (administrative body) elected its permanent executive body - the city government, which consisted of the mayor (also elected for four years) and several members. The mayor was simultaneously the chairman of both the city duma and the city government. City councils were under the control of government officials.

The right to elect and be elected to the city duma had the right only to residents with a property qualification (mainly owners of houses, commercial and industrial establishments, banks). The first electoral assembly included large taxpayers who contributed a third of city taxes, the second - smaller ones, paying another third of taxes, the third - all the rest. In the largest cities, the number of vowels (elected) averaged 5.6% of the population. Thus, the bulk of the urban population was excluded from participation in urban self-government.

The competence of city self-government was limited to solving purely economic issues (improvement of cities, construction of hospitals, schools, care for the development of trade, fire prevention measures, city taxation).

Judicial reform.

Among the reforms, one of the leading places undoubtedly belongs to the judicial reform. This deeply thought-out reform had a strong and direct influence on the entire system of state and public life. She introduced into it completely new, long-awaited principles - the complete separation of the judiciary from the administrative and accusatory, the publicity and openness of the court, the independence of judges, the advocacy and the adversarial procedure for legal proceedings.

The country was divided into 108 judicial districts.

The essence of judicial reform is as follows:

The court is made oral and public;

The power of the judiciary is separated from the prosecution and belongs to the courts without any participation of the administrative power;

The main form of legal proceedings is the adversarial process;

The case on the merits can be dealt with no more than in two instances. Two types of courts were introduced: world and general. The magistrate's courts, represented by a magistrate, tried criminal and civil cases, the damage in which did not exceed 500 rubles. Justices of the peace were elected by district zemstvo assemblies, approved by the Senate, and could be dismissed only at their own request or by court order. The general court consisted of three instances: the district court, the judicial chamber, the Senate. The district courts heard serious civil suits and criminal (juror) cases. The Trial Chambers heard appeals and were the court of first instance for political and state affairs. The Senate was the highest judicial instance and could cancel the decisions of the courts submitted for cassation.

In cases of crimes involving punishments, connected with the deprivation of all or some of the rights and advantages of the state, the determination of guilt is left to jurors, elected from local residents of all classes;

Eliminates clerical secrecy;

Both for intercession in cases and for the defense of defendants, there are sworn attorneys at the courts, who are under the supervision of special councils composed of the same corporation.

Judicial statutes extended to 44 provinces and were introduced into them for more than thirty years.

In 1863, a law was passed that abolished corporal punishment with gauntlets, whips, whips and brands on the verdicts of civil and military courts. Women were completely exempted from corporal punishment. But the rods were kept for the peasants (according to the verdicts of the volost courts), for the exiled, hard labor and penal soldiers.

military reform.

The military administration has also undergone transformations.

Already at the beginning of the reign, military settlements were destroyed. Degrading corporal punishment was abolished.

Particular attention was paid to raising the level general education army officers through military reforms educational institutions. Military gymnasiums and cadet schools with a two-year term of study were created. They included persons of all classes.

In January 1874, an all-estate conscription. The Supreme Manifesto on this occasion said: "Protection of the throne and the Fatherland is the sacred duty of every Russian subject ...". Under the new law, all young people who have reached the age of 21 are called up, but the government determines the required number of recruits every year, and draws only this number from the recruits (usually no more than 20-25% of recruits were called up for service). The call was not subject to the only son of the parents, the only breadwinner in the family, and also if the older brother of the recruit is serving or has served his service. Those taken into service are listed in it: in ground forces 15 years: 6 years in the ranks and 9 years in the reserve, in the Navy - 7 years of active service and 3 years in the reserve. For those who have received primary education, the term of active service is reduced to 4 years, those who have graduated from a city school - up to 3 years, a gymnasium - up to one and a half years, and those who have higher education - up to six months.

Thus, the result of the reform was the creation of a small peacetime army with a significant trained reserve in case of war.

The system of military command and control has undergone fundamental changes in order to strengthen control over the locations of troops. The result of this revision was approved on August 6, 1864 "Regulations on the military district administrations." Based on this "Regulations", nine military districts were initially organized, and then (August 6, 1865) four more. In each district, a chief commander was appointed, appointed at the direct highest discretion, bearing the title of commander of the troops of the military district. This position may also be assigned to the local governor-general. In some districts, an assistant to the commander of the troops is also appointed.

TO late XIX century, the number of the Russian army was (for 130 million people): officers, doctors and officials - 47 thousand, lower ranks- 1 million 100 thousand. Then these figures declined and reached 742,000 people, while the military potential was maintained.

In the 60s, at the insistence of the Ministry of War, railways were built to the western and southern borders of Russia, and in 1870 railway troops appeared. During the 70s, the technical re-equipment of the army was basically completed.

Caring for the defenders of the Motherland was manifested in everything, even in small things. For example, for more than a hundred years (until the 80s of the XIX century), boots were sewn without distinction between the right and left legs. It was believed that during a combat alarm, a soldier had no time to think about which boot to wear, on which leg.

Special treatment was given to the prisoners. Soldiers who were taken prisoner and were not in the service of the enemy, upon returning home, received a salary from the state for the entire time they were in captivity. The prisoner was considered a victim. And those who distinguished themselves in battles were waiting for military awards. Orders of Russia were especially highly valued. They gave such privileges that they even changed the position of a person in society.

financial reforms.

One of the main means of raising the economic power of the country was considered to be the construction of a network of railways linking the central regions of the European part of Russia. In connection with it, foreign leave increased 10 times, and the import of goods almost also increased. The number of commercial and industrial enterprises increased markedly, as well as the number of factories and plants. Credit institutions appeared - banks, headed by the State Bank (1860).

It was at this time that the first coal-mining and metallurgical enterprises were created in Ukraine and oil-producing enterprises in Baku.

Reforms in the field of education.

Public education also attracted the attention of the king. Especially importance In this regard, the publication of a new and general charter of Russian universities on July 18, 1863, in the development of which, at the initiative of the Minister of Education A.V. Golovkin, was attended by a special commission at the main board of schools, composed mainly of professors from St. Petersburg University, had in this regard. The charter granted the universities a fairly broad autonomy: the election of the rector, deans, professors was introduced, the University Council received the right to independently resolve all scientific, educational, administrative and financial issues. And in connection with the development of universities, science began to develop at a rapid pace.

According to the Regulations on Primary Public Schools approved on June 14, 1864, the state, church and society (zemstvos and cities) were to jointly educate the people.

November 19, 1864 appeared new charter about gymnasiums, which proclaimed equality in admission to all classes. But because of the high pay, it was available only to children of wealthy parents.

Attention was also paid to women's education. Already in the 60s, instead of the former closed women's institutions, open ones began to be arranged, with the admission of girls of all classes, and these new institutions were under the authority of the institutions of Empress Maria. Similar gymnasiums began to be approved by the Ministry of Public Education. In 1870, on May 24, a new Regulation on Women's Gymnasiums and Progymnasiums of the Ministry of Public Education was approved. The need for higher female education led to the establishment of pedagogical courses and higher female courses in St. Petersburg, Moscow, Kyiv, Kazan and Odessa.

Reforms in the field of printing.

The reform of the press also had a profound and beneficial effect on the development of public consciousness.

In 1857, the government put the question of revising the censorship charter on the agenda. After the permission in 1858 to discuss in the press the problems of social life and the activities of the government, the number of periodicals (1860 - 230) and book titles (1860 -2058) increased sharply.

Already in 1862, the main department of censorship was closed and part of its duties was assigned to the Ministry of the Interior, and the other - directly to the Minister of Education.

On April 6, 1865, the “Temporary Rules on the Press” were approved, which exempted from preliminary censorship original works of at least ten pages, and translated works of at least twenty sheets, and some periodicals at the discretion of the Minister of the Interior. For periodicals, a large cash deposit was additionally required. Official and scientific publications were exempted from censorship.

The "Temporary Rules on the Press" operated practically unchanged for 40 years.

The assassination of the emperor.

Emperor Alexander II, who caused delight and surprise of enlightened people of the whole world, also met ill-wishers. Pursuing incomprehensible goals, the organizers created a number of attempts on the life of the sovereign, who was the pride and glory of Russia. On March 1, 1881, the sovereign, for whom a large population was ready to lay down his life, died a martyr's death from a villainous hand that threw an explosive projectile.

On this fateful day, Emperor Alexander II decided to make a divorce (the procedure for sending out daily guards for a shift). The path lay along a narrow street, made up of the garden of the Grand Duchess, fenced with a stone fence the height of a man and a lattice of the Catherine Canal. The terrain is very impassable, and if it is true that the sovereign chose it in view of the anonymous threats he received, then it is difficult to imagine why an ambush awaited him precisely on this path, except because they noticed a large, against the usual, number of police on it. Be that as it may, but when the sovereign's carriage reached the Theater Bridge, there was an explosion that broke open the back of the carriage, which immediately stopped. The sovereign emerged from it unharmed, but one of the escorts, galloping behind, and a sapper officer, walking along the sidewalk along the stone wall of the Mikhailovsky Garden, were mortally wounded by a thrown bomb. The sovereign's coachman, sensing trouble, turned to him from the goat: "Let's go, sovereign!" The chief of police, galloping behind, jumped out of the sleigh with the same request to go faster. But the emperor did not listen and took a few steps back: "I want to see my wounded." At this time, the crowd managed to stop a healthy kid who threw a bomb. The sovereign turned to him: “So it was you who wanted to kill me?” But he did not succeed in finishing, as the second bomb exploded in front of him, and he lowered himself with the words: “Help.” They rushed to him, lifted him up, put the chief of police in the sledge (who himself received 45 wounds from small fragments of the bomb, but not a single fatal one) and drove him away. A little over an hour later, at 3:35 pm, Tsar Alexander II died in the Winter Palace.

The eminent Russian philosopher V. V. Rozanov called the assassination of the emperor "a mixture of Madness and Meanness."

The political testament of Alexander II was destroyed. Alexander III, in the consciousness of his past delusions and in an effort to return to the ideal of the kings of Moscow, turned to the people with a manifesto, which affirmed the inviolability of autocratic power and the exclusive responsibility of the autocrat before God.

The Russian Empire thus returned to the old traditional paths on which it had once found glory and prosperity.

Significance of the reign of Alexander II in the history of Russia.

Alexander II left a deep mark on history, he managed to do what other autocrats were afraid to take on - the liberation of the peasants from serfdom. We enjoy the fruits of his reforms to this day.

The internal reforms of Alexander II are comparable in scale only to the reforms of Peter I. The reformer tsar made truly grandiose transformations without social cataclysms and fratricidal war.

With the abolition of serfdom, commercial and industrial activity "resurrected", a stream of workers poured into the cities, and new areas for entrepreneurship opened up. Old ties were restored between cities and counties and new ones were created.

The fall of serfdom, the equalization of all before the court, the creation of new liberal forms of social life led to the freedom of the individual. And the feeling of this freedom awakened the desire to develop it. Dreams were created about the establishment of new forms of family and social life.

During his reign, Russia firmly strengthened its relations with the European powers, and resolved numerous conflicts with neighboring countries.

The tragic death of the emperor greatly changed the further course of history, and it was this event that 35 years later led Russia to death, and Nicholas II to a martyr's wreath.


History of the Ukrainian SSR in ten volumes. Volume Four Team of Authors

6. BOURGEOIS REFORMS OF THE 60-70s

6. BOURGEOIS REFORMS OF THE 60-70s

After the abolition of serfdom, reforms were carried out in the field of administration, courts, education, military affairs and finance. Their goal was to, while maintaining the autocratic power of the tsar and the dominance of the class of noble landowners, adapt the country to the new conditions of socio-economic development.

Land reform. One of the government measures aimed at improving the management system and strengthening its positions was the zemstvo reform of 1864. As V. I. Lenin pointed out, it “was one of those concessions that were repulsed from the autocratic government by a wave of public excitement and revolutionary onslaught” X. As a result of this reform, zemstvos were created in a number of provinces of Russia - the so-called local self-government under the leadership of the nobility. In Ukraine, the reform spread to the southern and left-bank provinces, in which 6 provincial and over 60 county zemstvo councils were created. On the Right Bank, where most of the landowners belonged to persons of Polish origin, some of whom took part in the national liberation movement, the Zemstvo reform was carried out only in 1911.

By law, the zemstvo consisted of county and provincial zemstvo assemblies and their executive bodies - county and provincial zemstvo councils. The composition of the county assemblies included vowels elected for a three-year term at meetings of voters separately for curia: at the congress of landowners of the county, meetings of city owners and volost gatherings of peasants. In the first two curias, a high property qualification was established: for landowners - the presence of estates in some counties ranging in size from 200 to 900 acres, in others - from 800 acres or more, for the urban bourgeoisie - the ownership of enterprises with an annual turnover of 6 thousand rubles. or real estate in small towns (with a population of up to 2 thousand people) from 500 rubles. and above, in cities with a population of over 10 thousand inhabitants - from 3 thousand rubles. and more. Vowels, elected at district zemstvo assemblies, formed the provincial assembly. Zemsky councils were elected at county and provincial assemblies for a period of 3 years. From 10 to 96 vowels were elected to county zemstvos, from 15 to 100 vowels to provincial zemstvos.

The tsarist authorities, expressing the interests of the ruling classes, took every measure to ensure that representatives of these classes were elected to the zemstvos.

As a result of the establishment of a system of unequal elections, the majority of vowels elected to the zemstvo were noble landowners (average for the country 74.2%), who occupied a dominant position in it and directed its activities in their class interests. The working peasantry, which, in accordance with the "Regulations on Zemstvo Institutions", received the right to participate in their activities, in fact, did not play any role in these institutions (its representatives made up 10.6% of the vowels). Even in those cases when the peasants received a victory in the elections, they could not take advantage of it because of their unpreparedness for work in the Zemstvos and illiteracy. So, in particular, it happened in the Bobrinets uyezd (this uyezd existed from 1829 to 1865) of the Kherson province, where, in connection with the refusal of the nobles to run for the zemstvo council, only peasants were elected. But because of their illiteracy, they were forced to draw up an act stating that the councils could not conduct business. The tsarist authorities took advantage of this circumstance by calling new elections, and this time only representatives of the privileged classes were elected to the council.

Both county and provincial zemstvo institutions did not enjoy independence and any power. “... Zemstvo from the very beginning,” wrote V. I. Lenin, “was condemned to be the fifth wheel in the cart of Russian state administration, a wheel allowed by the bureaucracy only insofar as its omnipotence was not violated, and the role of deputies from the population was limited bare practice, simple technical execution of the range of tasks outlined by the same bureaucracy.

The functions of the zemstvos were limited. In essence, they boiled down to maintaining local roads in good condition, providing the population with food in case of famine, organizing agronomic and medical assistance, building and maintaining schools, establishing postal services, distributing public funds, collecting and submitting statistical information to state bodies. All this, of course, had a positive effect. Representing a social institution alien to the autocratic-bureaucratic system, which, although formally, was an elected representation of all estates, the zemstvos eventually became a stronghold of the bourgeois-liberal opposition to the autocracy.

Judicial reform. In 1864, the government carried out a judicial reform, culminating in the establishment of bourgeois legal proceedings. Previously, the court was class-based, closed and entirely dependent on the tsarist administration, in particular on the governor. Now, in accordance with the newly adopted judicial statutes, the basic principles of bourgeois law were introduced: the lack of estates of the court, the adversarial nature of the parties, the publicity of the proceedings, which took place in open sessions with the participation of the parties and was decided by jurors, selected, as a rule, from the wealthy sections of the population. District courts were created (one per province), representing the first judicial instance. If their sentences were handed down with the participation of jurors, they were considered final, while sentences handed down without the participation of a jury could be appealed to a judicial chamber, which included several district courts. There were three judicial chambers in Ukraine - Kiev, Kharkov and Odessa. Cassation functions were performed by the Senate, which could return a particular case for reconsideration. To resolve petty cases, the institution of magistrates was introduced, who were elected for a three-year term at meetings of zemstvo and city vowels or appointed on behalf of the government. Their decisions could be reviewed by district congresses of justices of the peace. The network of world judicial sites was quite wide. Only in Right-Bank Ukraine there were 162 such plots.

All these and other measures provided for by the judicial statutes of 1864 were a certain step forward along the path of transforming feudal estate law into bourgeois law, although in the field of justice the reform left significant vestiges of serfdom: estate representation in the judicial chamber, separate courts for the clergy and military, the preservation of the estate volost court for peasants, not connected with the general judicial system, which was given the right to sentence peasants to humiliating punishment with rods. The popular masses often refused to carry out the orders of the hated court officials, did not recognize their decisions, and even inflicted just punishment on them.

Despite its imperfection, the judicial reform was one of the most important transformations that contributed to the formation and strengthening of the bourgeois system in the country.

School and censorship reforms. The bourgeois reforms of the 1960s and 1970s could not bypass school and censorship. Forced in connection with the development of capitalism and under the influence of technological progress to take the path of some expansion of the network of school and educational institutions, the tsarist government at the same time decided to subordinate educational institutions and the press to its control. In accordance with the "Regulations on Primary Public Schools", approved on July 14, 1864, a unified system of primary education was introduced. Both state and public institutions and departments, as well as private individuals, were allowed to create primary schools, but the leadership educational process and control over it was assigned to the county and provincial school councils, which consisted of royal officials, representatives of the zemstvos and the clergy.

Based on the premise that the elementary school should educate the people in religious-monarchical morality, the “Regulations” provided, firstly, for the appointment of a bishop as the chairman of the provincial school council and, secondly, for the obligatory teaching at school of such subjects as “the law of God” and church singing. Of the general educational disciplines, only literacy and four arithmetic operations, information on geography, drawing, etc. were introduced. Consequently, the program elementary school was very limited.

Changes in the field of secondary education were determined by the charter of November 19, 1864, in accordance with which classical and real male and female gymnasiums were created in the country. The right to study in them was granted to all classes, but because of the high fees, only the children of the rich could use it. Only persons who graduated from classical gymnasiums had the right to enter universities. Graduation from a real gymnasium gave the right to enter a higher technical school, and for women it did not give any rights at all, because its goal, as it was directly proclaimed in the charter, was to prepare an educated "wife and mother of the family."

Certain changes were made by the government to the system of supervision of higher education. The new charter of June 18, 1863 renewed the academic autonomy of the universities, created a council of professors, which was supposed to manage the entire life of the educational institution, including supervising students. By these measures, the tsarist government, making some concessions to the liberal professors, tried to enlist them in the struggle against the student movement.

A reform in the field of censorship was carried out in 1865. In order to prevent the penetration of revolutionary ideas into the masses through the printed word, the tsarist government established a particularly strict supervision of the organs of the press and, for this purpose, reorganized the censorship institutions. In accordance with the new censorship regulations, they were transferred from the jurisdiction of the Ministry of Public Education to the subordination of the Ministry of the Interior, which included the creation of the Main Directorate for Press Affairs and the Central Committee of Foreign Censorship. Church censorship continued to operate. Small-scale publications intended for the mass reader were subjected to especially strict supervision. If books were found to violate censorship requirements, their publishers were held accountable through the judiciary.

In case of violation of censorship requirements, periodicals were subject to administrative action in the form of a warning, temporary suspension, and, finally, prohibition of publication. All provincial publications were subjected to preliminary censorship.

So, the school and censorship reforms, like all other reforms of the 60s and 70s, although they represented a step forward, were limited, and after they were carried out, remnants of the old, feudal order remained, hindering the further social and cultural progress of the Russian, Ukrainian and other peoples of the country.

Urban and financial reforms. Satisfying the interests of the growing bourgeoisie, the tsarist government decided to reorganize the system of urban self-government, adapting it to the needs of bourgeois development. In accordance with the law of June 16, 1870, the principle of election to city dumas changed in all cities of the country. The definition of the right to participate in the elections of vowels to city dumas was now based not on estate, but on property qualification. Suffrage was granted only to owners of immovable property who paid taxes; others, who made up the majority of the urban population, and above all workers, artisans and petty employees, did not have this right. In addition, voters were required to have Russian citizenship and the absence of city tax debts, and an age limit of at least 25 years was also established. Women were not allowed to take part in elections to city offices. In order to ensure the predominance of representatives of the big bourgeoisie in the thoughts, the elections of vowels (from 30 to 72 in different cities of the country) were held in three curiae, each of which, regardless of the number of those participating in the elections, elected a third of the total number of vowels. In accordance with this system of elections, a few dozen representatives of the big bourgeoisie elected as many representatives as hundreds of middle and thousands of small capital owners.

The Duma elected for a four-year term an executive body - a city council with a chairman at the head, who was approved in the provincial centers by the minister of internal affairs, in other cities - by the governor. City governments were engaged in the improvement of cities, industry, trade and other economic issues. They reported directly to the Governor and the Minister of the Interior.

The acute financial crisis that engulfed the country in the 1950s and reflected the general decline of the entire feudal-serf system necessitated the implementation of bourgeois reforms in the financial and credit system. The financial reforms carried out in 1860-1864 affected both the tax and credit systems, as well as the budget and state financial control. In particular, in 1860 the State Bank was established, whose activities had a positive impact on the development of capitalist industry and trade, contributed to the expansion of the network of private commercial joint-stock banks. Somewhat later, instead of the taxation system, excise taxation of alcoholic beverages was introduced, indirect taxes on consumer goods were increased, departmental cash desks were eliminated and state cash desks were created, which concentrated in their hands all the profits and expenses of the state determined by the budget, a single state audit center was introduced with a very branched peripheral network and broad rights in the field of financial control.

All these measures naturally contributed to the development of capitalism in all spheres of social production.

However, financial reforms, like other bourgeois reforms of the 1960s and 1970s, were limited and inconsistent. In particular, long time the so-called poll tax was preserved - extremely heavy and humiliating for the working masses. The reforms did little to improve the financial situation of the state, its budget was chronically in deficit, which forced the tsarist government to issue loans, the debt on which steadily increased.

military reform. The changes also affected the organization and construction of the country's armed forces. The entire territory of Russia in 1864 was divided into 10 military districts. Ukrainian provinces became part of the Kiev (Kiev, Podolsk and Volyn provinces), Odessa (Kherson, Yekaterinoslav, Taurida and Bessarabia regions) and Kharkov (Kharkov, Poltava, Chernigov, Voronezh, Kursk and Oryol provinces) districts. At the head of the district was the commander, who, through the headquarters and the military district council, exercised command over the troops and their economy.

Along with the districts, other bodies of local military administration were created. In each province and district, departments of a military commander were established. Subordinate to the chief commander of the military district, the local administration acquired a certain importance after the establishment of a regular system for the training of reserves and the introduction of the law on military service.

On January 1, 1874, a new military charter was adopted, according to which universal military service was introduced in the country for males who had reached the age of 20. The charter provided for a reduction in the term of military service in the ground forces to 6 and in the navy to 7 years. Persons who had a certain education were allowed to serve in the position of volunteers for a period of 6 months to 4 years. And although the conditions for military service became easier, but, as before, the entire burden of it fell on the shoulders of the working masses.

To a number of peoples and nationalities Central Asia, the Caucasus and the Far North, the law on conscription into the army did not apply. The clergy and certain privileged strata of society, part of the foreign colonists, were exempted from military service.

A vivid description of the consequences of the military reform was given by V. I. Lenin, who wrote that “in essence, we did not have and do not have universal military service, because the privileges of noble birth and wealth create a lot of exceptions.

In essence, we did not have and do not have anything resembling equal rights for citizens in military service. On the contrary, the barracks is thoroughly saturated with the spirit of the most outrageous lawlessness.

In general, the reforms of the 60s and 70s, although they retained numerous remnants of serfdom, created the necessary conditions for a more rapid transition of the country from a feudal to a capitalist socio-economic formation. According to the definition of V. I. Lenin, 1861 marked "the beginning of a new, bourgeois, Russia, which grew out of the serf era."

The reforms carried out by tsarism were supposed to adapt the existing social and political system of the country to the needs of the growing capitalist economy. Emphasizing this, V. I. Lenin wrote: “If we take a general look at the change in the entire way of life Russian state in 1861, it must be admitted that this change was a step towards the transformation of the feudal monarchy into a bourgeois monarchy. This is true not only from an economic but also from a political point of view. It is enough to recall the nature of the reform in the field of court, administration, local self-government, etc., the reforms that followed the peasant reform of 1861, to be convinced of the correctness of this provision.

Being, by definition of V. I. Lenin, a by-product revolutionary struggle, the reform of 1861 was a certain facet, a historical turning point on the path of transforming the feudal-serf socio-economic formation into a capitalist one. As a result of its implementation, the old, feudal-serf production relations based on the monopoly ownership of land by feudal lords and incomplete ownership of the serf in the routine state of technology were changed, and the necessary conditions were created for the establishment of a new, capitalist basis. Feudal Russia, including Ukraine, became a capitalist country.

From the book of Stratagems. About the Chinese art of living and surviving. TT. 12 author von Senger Harro

25.16. To keep socialist reforms and openness from slipping into bourgeois rails From the misinterpretation of the "course of reforms and openness" warns the People's Daily of 24.04.1991; “Reform and openness is our constant course. We will not deviate from the intended path, we even

author Froyanov Igor Yakovlevich

The internal policy of tsarism in the 60-70s of the XIX century. Bourgeois reforms The peasant reform of 1861 led to changes in economic structure society, which necessitated the transformation political system. New bourgeois reforms wrested from the government in

From the book History of Russia from ancient times to the beginning of the 20th century author Froyanov Igor Yakovlevich

Military reforms of the 60-70s The need to increase the combat capability of the Russian army, which became obvious already during the Crimean War and clearly declared itself during the European events of the 60-70s, when the Prussian army demonstrated its combat capability (association

From the book History of Russia. 20th century author

§ 4. The economy of the USSR in the 50s - early 60s: the main development trends and management reforms in the 50s and early 60s. are considered the most successful period in the development of the Soviet economy in terms of both economic growth rates and the efficiency of public

From the book History of Russia with early XVIII until the end of the 19th century author Bokhanov Alexander Nikolaevich

§ 4. Liberal Reforms of the 1960s and 1970s Russia approached the peasant reform with an extremely backward and neglected local (zemstvo, as they used to say) economy. Medical assistance in the village was practically non-existent. Epidemics claimed thousands of lives. The peasants did not know

From the book History of Russia author Munchaev Shamil Magomedovich

§ 2. Bourgeois reforms of the 60-70s. and counter-reforms of the 1980s and 1990s, Russia entered the 19th century. absolute (autocratic) monarchy. At the head of the pyramid of power was the emperor. He issued laws and monitored their implementation, was the supreme judge, managed finances. However, the increase

From the book History of Korea: from antiquity to the beginning of the XXI century. author Kurbanov Sergey Olegovich

§ 1. The Sino-Japanese War and the Kabo and Yilmi Reforms The Sino-Japanese War, as already mentioned, was objectively caused by the achievement of relative parity in the economic presence of the two countries on the Korean Peninsula under the political dominance of China.

From the book History of Georgia (from ancient times to the present day) the author Vachnadze Merab

§2. Reforms of the 60s-70s of the XIX century The peasant reform of 1861 undermined the socio-economic basis of feudal-serf Russia and gave a powerful impetus to the development of capitalism. It soon became apparent that other reforms were needed. In the 60s and 70s of the 19th century

From book Southeast Asia in XIII - XVI centuries author Berzin Eduard Oskarovich

Chapter 8 VIETNAM FROM THE 70'S OF THE XIV C. BEFORE THE BEGINNING OF THE XV CENTURY REFORMS OF HO KUI LI In 1369 Chan Zu Tong died without leaving an heir. A power struggle ensued within the royal family. The most legitimate claimant was Prince Tran Nge Tong, son of King Tran Minh Tong by Minh Thu's younger wife and

From the book Political Portraits. Leonid Brezhnev, Yuri Andropov author Medvedev Roy Alexandrovich

Reforms and counter-reforms of 1964–1965 The removal of N. S. Khrushchev from the post of head of the party and state and the promotion of L. I. Brezhnev and A. N. Kosygin to these posts were not accompanied at first by any serious personnel changes, except for a few

From the book History of India. XX century. author Yurlov Felix Nikolaevich

CHAPTER 27 REFORM IN THE 1990s Nehru-Gandhi Political Dynasty Ended Four months after Chandrashekhar's government came to power, Congress withdrew its support in his favor. The government was forced to resign, but continued

From the book The Great Past of the Soviet People author Pankratova Anna Mikhailovna

4. Bourgeois reforms The Crimean War clearly showed the backwardness of serf Russia. The Russian soldiers were mostly armed with old, slow-loading smoothbore guns, while the French and British infantrymen had rapid-fire and

From the book Nobility, power and society in provincial Russia of the 18th century author Team of authors

Administrative reforms of Catherine II in the early 1760s Catherine II began the fight against corruption from the very first days of her reign. On July 18, 1762, a decree was issued to combat bribery in the state apparatus. Bribery of officials has been severely

From the book History of the Ukrainian SSR in ten volumes. Volume four author Team of authors

Chapter IX THE FALL OF serfdom. BOURGEOIS REFORMS OF THE 60-70s Late 50s - early 60s of the XIX century. became a turning point in the history of Russia, including Ukraine. During these years, the first revolutionary situation took shape, which clearly showed the impossibility of

From the book Serbia in the Balkans. 20th century author Nikiforov Konstantin Vladimirovich

Reforms of the 1960s In 1964-1965 Yugoslavia began to carry out the most radical reforms in the economy during the entire self-government experiment. In the literature, they are usually combined under the general name "socio-economic reform of 1965." It should be noted,

From Zagogulin's book in the president's briefcase author Lagodsky Sergey Alexandrovich

2.2. Reforms of the 1990s: from cooperation to privatization At the end of the 1980s, an atmosphere of discontent dominated Soviet society economic situation countries. The growth of production, its efficiency, and the improvement of the living standards of the population have come to a halt. Priority

The huge army, built on drill and long-term (25 years) service of part of the population, has not been reformed for 30 years. Outdated weapons were in service, outdated strategic and tactical combat schemes were used. The military bureaucracy squandered the huge budgetary money allocated for defense aimlessly. This prompted the beginning of military reforms in Russia.

The reforms began with the appointment in 1861 to the post of Minister of War D.A. Milyutin (elder brother of N.A. Milyutin), Professor of the Academy General Staff, who possessed outstanding military and personal talents, adhering to liberal views. With the name D.A. Milyutin, who was Minister of War for 20 years, connected with the radical reorganization of the Russian army. On January 15, 1862, he provided Alexander II with a program of military reforms. It provided for the reduction of the armed forces in peacetime and their deployment at the expense of trained reserves during the war, the reorganization of the training of officers and the creation of a new army command structure. First of all, Milyutin achieved a reduction in the term of soldier's service to 15 years, while after 7-8 years of service the soldier was granted temporary leave. Then corporal punishment was abolished in the army - gauntlets, "cats", whips and lashes. Following this, the military command and control system was reorganized. According to the “Regulations” issued on August 6, 1864, the entire territory of Russia was divided into 15 military districts, each with its own department directly subordinate to the Ministry of War. Artillery, guards, engineering troops, military educational institutions (before that they had their own separate departments), and for the duration of hostilities - the active army. In 1867, a new military judicial charter was adopted, built on the basis of the judicial reform of 1864. Three judicial instances were introduced - regimental, military district and chief military courts. During the war, the Main Military Field Court was established. The decisions of the military courts were subject to the approval of the regimental and district commanders, respectively, and, in the last resort, the minister of war.

In the mid-1960s, military educational institutions were reformed. In 1863 cadet corps were transformed into military gymnasiums, close in terms of the program of general education disciplines (in addition to special military ones) to real schools. The system of higher military education was expanded in military academies - the Academy of the General Staff, Artillery, Engineering, Military Medical and in the newly established Military Law. In 1863, the Main Directorate of Military Educational Institutions was established as part of the Military Ministry, headed by N.V. Isakov, who became the direct leader of the reform of military education.

In 1872, the first in Russia women's courses for scientific midwives were opened at the academy, where students received higher medical education. In 1877, on the basis of the Academic Course of Marine Sciences, a Marine Academy. In total, by 1880, the number of military educational institutions included: 6 military academies, 6 military schools, 18 military gymnasiums, 16 cadet schools, 8 pro-gymnasiums, the Page and Finland Corps with special classes, the preparatory boarding school of the Nikolaev Cavalry School and the Marine Corps.

The reform of military educational institutions made it possible to significantly reduce the shortage of officers and raise the level of their training.

Since the 60s, the rearmament of the Russian army began. Since 1866, smooth-bore weapons began to be replaced by rifled ones. A rapid-fire rifle of the Berdan system was adopted for service. The artillery park was replaced with new systems of steel rifled guns, and the construction of a military steam fleet began. The introduction of all-class conscription made it possible to increase the size of the army, create a trained reserve of up to 550 thousand people, necessary for the deployment of the army in wartime, and also contributed to the transformation of the Russian armed forces into a modern mass army. The state militia was supposed to include persons who did not undergo military service at all, as well as those who had served the prescribed number of years (active service and reserve). age limit stay in the militia was set at 40 years. Later it was increased to 40 years. However, the law was not completely consistent. A significant part of the "foreign" population was eliminated from military service (natives of Central Asia, Kazakhstan, some peoples of the Far North).

Military factories have undergone a radical technological reconstruction. It required the creation of new industrial enterprises and industries. Several strategic railroads were laid to the western borders and to the south. In 1870, special railway troops were created. For the rearmament of artillery, the creation of the Obukhov and Perm steel cannon plants, as well as the achievement of Russian scientists and engineers P.M., was extremely important. Obukhova, N.V. Kalakutsky, A.S. Lavrova, N.V. Maievsky, and others. So, thanks to the discovery of P.M. Obukhov in Russia, for the first time in the world, gun barrels made of cast steel began to be created. As a result, in the 60s, Russia, along with Germany, became a monopoly in the production of steel tools. Nevertheless, in the conditions of general economic backwardness, it was not possible to completely overcome the dependence of the Russian army on foreign supplies.

In the field artillery in 1866, steel guns of 9 and 4 pounds were installed as models of guns, and in 1970 quick-firing guns were introduced. In siege artillery, instead of smooth-bore guns, rifled ones were established, and instead of copper, steel ones. A lot of work on the rearmament of artillery was carried out under the direct supervision of General A.A. Barantsova. The restructuring of the fortresses began according to the plan drawn up by General E.I. Totleben. However, it was not completed due to lack of funds. The transition to new weapons encouraged the development military theory. At this time, the works of major military theorists D.A. Milyutin, G.A. Leera, M.I. Dragomirova and others. Their works on questions of strategy, tactics and military history had a great influence both on the course of the military reforms themselves and on the development of military art in the second half of the 19th century.

The rearmament of the army made significant adjustments to combat training. The task was to teach the troops only what was needed in the war. A number of new statutes, instructions and teaching aids. For example, in the Military Regulations on combat and infantry service of 1862, much attention was paid to solitary training. In 1863, the Disciplinary Regulations were introduced and a special order was issued for the training of recruits, which ordered them to be taught how to use a gun, loading and shooting, the rules of loose and rank formation, with the indispensable condition of conscious assimilation.

Since 1876, military horse service was introduced: for the duration of the war, horse stock fit for military purposes was subject to mobilization with monetary compensation to its owners. In this regard, military horse censuses began to be regularly conducted.

In the field of foreign policy, one of the main tasks of the government of Alexander II was the struggle for the abolition of the humiliating articles of the Paris Peace Treaty, and the main one was the prohibition of Russia from having fortresses and a combat-ready navy on the Black Sea. This was done after the defeat of France in the war against Prussia in 1870. Despite British protests, Russia announced that it no longer considered itself bound by the terms of this peace treaty.

The military administration has also undergone transformations. Already at the beginning of the reign, military settlements were destroyed. Degrading corporal punishment was abolished. The system of military command and control has undergone fundamental changes in order to strengthen control over the locations of troops. The result of this revision was approved on August 6, 1864 "Regulations on the military district administrations." Based on this "Regulations", nine military districts were initially organized, and then (August 6, 1865) four more. In each district, a chief commander was appointed, appointed at the direct highest discretion, bearing the title of commander of the troops of the military district. This position may also be assigned to the local governor-general. In some districts, an assistant to the commander of the troops is also appointed.

Caring for the defenders of the Motherland was manifested in everything, even in small things. For example, for more than a hundred years (until the 80s of the XIX century), boots were sewn without distinction between the right and left legs. It was believed that during a combat alarm, a soldier had no time to think about which boot to wear, on which leg.

Special treatment was given to the prisoners. Soldiers who were taken prisoner and were not in the service of the enemy, upon returning home, received a salary from the state for the entire time they were in captivity. The prisoner was considered a victim. And those who distinguished themselves in battles were waiting for military awards. Orders of Russia were especially highly valued. They gave such privileges that they even changed the position of a person in society.

These transformations significantly improved the combat training of the Russian army. Universal conscription has long been introduced in many European countries. In Russia, for a long time, the recruiting system introduced by Peter I was preserved, which was one of the most advanced in Europe at that time, where recruitment and hiring dominated. But for the second half of the 19th century, when the era of mass armies began, it did not provide the army with a trained reserve. Actually, the problem of reserves arose already at the time Patriotic War 1812, but after its end, the governments of Alexander I and Nicholas I took the path of increasing the size of the standing army and creating military settlements. However, it turned out that, having the largest peacetime army in terms of numbers, Russia, in the event of a war, cannot ensure its replenishment with trained people; had to resort to convening the militia. The main provision of the military reform, carried out by the Minister of War Dmitry Milyutin, was the introduction of universal military service.

Milyutin managed to prove to Alexander II the whole injustice of class military service and the need to abolish it. After all, military service was previously carried out only by the subject class, i.e. peasants and townspeople. However, to convince the king to introduce universal military service, it took a lot of time.

On January 1, 1874, Alexander II approved the "Charter of military service" and a special Manifesto about it. Under the law of 1874, clerics of all faiths, representatives of certain religious sects and organizations (because of their religious beliefs), the peoples of Central Asia and Kazakhstan, and some peoples of the Caucasus and the Far North were exempted from military service. In relation to the Russian population, military service actually extended to taxable estates, since the privileged estates, due to their education or training in military educational institutions, were practically exempted from military service. Class distinctions persisted in the army itself. The command staff of the Russian post-reform army was predominantly from the nobility, although formally persons from taxable estates had the right to enter military educational institutions and, in the future, become officers. An ordinary soldier could only rise to the rank of non-commissioned officer.

First, on the initiative of Milyutin, in 1862 a special commission was created to revise the recruiting charter, chaired by the State Council N.I. Bakhtin. This commission included a number of representatives of the War Ministry, headed by General F.L. Heiden.

The commission's work progressed very slowly. The idea of ​​equality of all classes for carrying out this gravest military service has found irreconcilable opponents among those strata of society to which it has not yet extended. The feudal lords with all their might resisted all-class military service, which would force the "noble" nobility to serve it on an equal footing "with the peasants."

The intention to liquidate the obsolete recruiting system for the army was subjected to the strongest attacks.

Reactionary figures and publicists, referring to the manifesto on the freedom of the nobility, defended their class immunity. Shuvalov, for example, suggested keeping educated youth in the army "separately from the army."

Even the merchants were indignant at the fact that it would be impossible to pay off recruitment with money. As a result, the reform conceived in 1862 by Milyutin, who was supported by Grand Duke Konstantin Nikolaevich, was carried out only in 1874. The Franco-Prussian war of 1870 served as a strong impetus to this. Prussia, the name of a large conscription, a better organized army, more developed soldiers, defeated France. On November 7, 1870, the Minister of War submitted a note "On the main grounds for personal military service", approved by the emperor. After 10 days, two commissions were created by "highest command" to develop the proposed measures: one on the charter on military service, the other on the issue of reserve, local, reserve troops and state militia. General Heiden, Chief of the General Staff, was appointed Chairman of both commissions. The general management of their work was headed by D.A. Milyutin. The conscription commission was selected from representatives of various ministries and departments. Representatives of not only the highest bureaucracy, but also representatives of various classes and individual groups of the population were invited to its meetings.

For more qualified preparation of various chapters of the charter, the commission was divided into 4 departments. The first department worked out the issue of terms of service and benefits for serving military service, the second - on the return of those called up for service, the third - on conscription expenses, the fourth - on volunteers and military replacement.

Another, the so-called Organizing Commission, began work in early January 1871. It consisted mainly of the military and was divided into 9 departments: 1) on the organization of infantry units serving as personnel for the formation of reserve and reserve troops in wartime; 2) about artillery and engineering units; 3) about frames guards units; 4) about the personnel of the cavalry; 5) on the procedure for counting and calling up reserve ranks; 6) on commissary and artillery stocks and convoys; 7) about the Cossack troops; 8) about irregular militias; 9) about the state militia. In 1872, the Organizing Commission was significantly strengthened by the introduction of several commanders of military districts into its composition.

Of particular interest are the problems discussed at the meeting of this commission, connected with the possibility of applying the territorial system in Russia. As a rule, M.N. Osipov, these issues are again becoming relevant in connection with the ongoing reforms in the army. Recall that the territorial recruitment system provides for the replenishment of troops with personnel at the expense of draft contingents arriving near the places of deployment of military units. Such a system facilitates the dispatch of conscripts to their units, reduces the costs associated with this, makes it possible to attract conscripts for military training with a minimum interruption from productive work and to carry out the mobilization of troops in the shortest possible time. At the same time, this system, given the shortage of conscripts in the areas where military units are deployed, makes it difficult to equip them with the necessary specialists. There are other flaws as well. The organizing commission, recognizing the impossibility of the full application of the territorial system in Russia, unanimously came to the conclusion: “In the organization of the army, apply from the principles of the territorial system only what, according to the conditions of our fatherland, can be usefully applied, while maintaining the possibility of moving and concentrating troops, but allowing constant , from certain areas, recruiting each part of the army in peacetime and replenishing it to military strength, when brought to martial law.

Based on this, it was decided, according to the project of the General Staff, to divide the whole of European Russia into recruitment areas (on the territory of one or several counties). Each section was supposed to provide at least one infantry regiment, one separate battalion, two artillery batteries, one cavalry squadron. Upon completion of the work of the commission on military service, D.A. Milyutina on January 19, 1873, presented an extensive note to the State Council, similarly covering the course of her activities. As an annex to the note, drafts of the Charter on military service and the Regulations on the state militia were presented. When discussing the project of all-class military service on the State Council, a fierce and irreconcilable struggle unfolded. Some of the council members considered this reform premature, others demanded privileges for the nobility.

The establishment of compulsory military service, firstly, elevated the rank of warrior, and secondly, attracted to the army a significant number of persons belonging to the upper classes and generally educated, whereas, according to the laws in force, such persons were previously exempted from recruitment duty.

“Milyutin turned the cause of defending the motherland,” wrote A.F. Horses - from a severe burden for many to a high debt for all and from a single misfortune to a common duty.

The new law also influenced the composition of the army, making it younger, due to the reduction in active service, and homogeneous, according to the age of the lower ranks.

Significant transformations also extended to irregular troops (troops that did not have a single and permanent organization or differed from regular troops in the system of recruitment, service, etc. In Russia in the 18th - early 20th centuries - Cossack troops and etc.).

By the beginning of 1871, the following Cossack troops were under the jurisdiction of the Military Ministry: Don, Tersk, Astrakhan, Ural, Orenburg, Siberian, Semirechensk, Transbaikal, Amur; Yenisei and Irkutsk cavalry regiments and three Cossack foot teams. New provisions on military service and military service of the Cossacks have been issued. The Cossacks received new weapons. Cossack units that were in active service were placed on an equal footing with regular troops.

All this made it possible to reduce the size of the army in peacetime and at the same time increase its combat effectiveness. Universal conscription gave the necessary effect only under the condition of the rapid mobilization of military reserves in the reserve, and this largely depends on the state of the means of communication.

Thus, the result of the reform was the creation of a small peacetime army with a significant trained reserve in case of war. Military reforms 1861 -1874 played an important role in improving the combat capability of the Russian army. However, the results of these reforms were not immediate. Military educational institutions could not yet make up for the acute shortage of officers, the process of rearmament of the army dragged on for several decades.

Transformations in the Russian Empire in the 60-70s of the century before last are called liberal reforms. The pivotal event of the long-term process was the Great Peasant Reform of 1861. It determined the course of further bourgeois reconstructions and reorganizations taken by the government of Alexander II. It was necessary to reorganize the political superstructure, rebuild the court, the army, and much more.

Thus, Alexander II's understanding of the urgent need for a peasant reform led him, in the course of implementing the plan, to carry out a complex of transformations in all spheres of Russian public life. Unwittingly, the emperor himself took steps towards a bourgeois monarchy, which was based on the transition to an industrial society, a market economy and parliamentarism. The assassination of the king in March 1881 turned the country's movement in a different direction.

Military, educational, peasant and judicial reforms were the main transformations carried out in Russia in the 60s and 70s of the century, and thanks to them the country overcame its significant backwardness from the advanced powers.

However, the reforms of Alexander II were not as ideal and did not go as smoothly as it should have been. aristocratic character Russian society persisted to a certain extent even after the much-desired liberal reforms were carried out.

What is liberalism

Liberalism is a direction of socio-political and philosophical thought that proclaims human rights and freedoms as the highest value. The influence of the state and other structures, including religion, on a person in a liberal society is usually limited by the constitution. In the economy, liberalism is expressed in the inviolability of private property, freedom of trade and entrepreneurship.

Reasons for liberal reforms

The main reason for liberal reforms is Russia's lagging behind the advanced European countries, which became especially noticeable by the middle of the 19th century. Another reason is the peasant uprisings, the number of which increased sharply by the mid-1850s; popular uprisings threatened the existing state system and autocratic power, so the situation had to be saved.

Prerequisites for reforms

Russian society in all periods of the New Age was very colorful. Completed conservatives here side by side with liberals, zealots of antiquity - with innovators, people with free views; supporters of autocracy tried to get along with adherents of a limited monarchy and republicans. By the middle of the nineteenth century, the contradictions between the "old" and "new" Russians escalated, as a whole galaxy of enlightened nobles grew up, longing for large-scale changes in the country. The imperial house had to make concessions in order to maintain supreme power.

Reform Objectives

The main task of liberal reforms is to overcome the social, political, military and intellectual backwardness of the Russian Empire. Particularly acute was the task of abolishing serfdom, which by that time was morally very outdated, and hindered the economic development of the country. Another task is to show activity precisely “from above”, on the part of the tsarist authorities, until the revolutionaries undertake radical transformations.

Reform of administration of zemstvos and cities

The nobility, after the abolition of serfdom, was concerned about the strengthening of its role in political life countries. The government of the reformers sensitively caught the mood of the ruling class and developed the zemstvo, and a little later, the city reforms.

The reforms were carried out in accordance with the “Regulations on provincial and district local institutions” of January 1, 1864 in 34 provinces of the European part of the empire and the “City Regulations” of June 16, 1870.

Zemstvo reform

urban reform

Governing bodies

  • Administrative bodies zemstvo assembly of the province and zemstvo assembly of the county
  • The executive bodies are the zemstvo council of the province and the zemstvo council of the county.
  • The head of the city duma and council is the mayor.
  • The governing body is the City Council.
  • The executive body is the City Council.
  • Opening and financing of schools, hospitals and almshouses;
  • Help for the starving in bad years;
  • The device of local industrial production;
  • Agronomy and veterinary medicine;
  • Statistics.
  • City improvement.
  • Development of local production and trade.
  • Organization of city markets.
  • Education and healthcare.
  • Establishment of sanitary standards and the introduction of fire prevention measures.

Members of the zemstvo assembly (vowels) were elected every three years by groups of voters (curia):

  • direct in agricultural and urban;
  • multi-stage in the peasant.

Vowels were elected every four years. Three-digit electoral system (small, medium and large taxpayers). Electoral rights had institutions and departments, secular and religious institutions that contributed fees to the city budget.

The main principles of the zemstvo and city reforms were:

  1. Separation of local self-government from administrative power.
  2. Election of governing bodies and all-class representation.
  3. Independence in financial and economic matters.

Democratic judicial reform

The judiciary, of all liberal reforms, is considered the most consistent. Since 1861, work began on the "Basic provisions for the transformation of the judicial part of Russia." In 1864, the sovereign approved modern judicial charters that defined new principles of legal proceedings:

Organizational principles of the court

The dishonesty of the court.

Irremovability and independence of judges.

Publicity.

Delimitation of the powers of the courts.

Introduction to the institution of jurors.

Establishment of the institute of forensic investigators.

Introduction to the Institute of Notaries.

Election of individual judicial bodies.

Political investigations are the prerogative of the gendarmerie.

Death sentences can be passed by the Senate and a military court.

Changing the system of punishments (cancellation of stigmatization and corporal punishment for women).

Court system

Special.

The emperor had the right to correct the decisions of all courts through administrative measures.

The overdue reform of the army

The experience of the Crimean War showed that Russia needed a massive army with the necessary reserves and a trained officer corps. The rearmament of the army and the reorganization of the military command and control system are urgently needed. The reform began to be prepared as early as 1861 and was implemented in 1874 with the following steps:

  1. 15 military districts have been created.
  2. Establishment of a network of military educational institutions.
  3. New military regulations have been introduced.
  4. Equipping the army with new models of weapons.
  5. Cancellation of the recruiting system.
  6. The introduction of universal conscription for the recruitment of the army.

As a result, the combat effectiveness of the Russian army increased significantly.

Education reform

Establishment of the "Regulations on Primary Public Schools" of 1864 and the Charter high school solved problems:

  • accessibility of education for all classes;
  • monopolies of the state and church in the field of education, permission for zemstvos, public associations and individuals to open educational institutions;
  • gender equality, opening higher courses for women;
  • expanding the autonomy of universities.

The reform affected all three educational levels and was significant for the development of the country.

Accompanying reforms

In addition to the landmark reforms, the following were carried out along the way:

    The financial reform of 1860 - 1864, which consisted in the transformation of the banking system and the strengthening of the role of the Ministry of Finance.

    The tax reform was manifested in the abolition of wine farming, the introduction of indirect taxes and the determination of the limits of zemstvo taxation.

    The censorship reform abolished the preview of works, but introduced a system of sanctions after publication.

Liberal reforms of Alexander II: pros and cons

Name of the reform

Essence of reform

Judicial reform

A unified system of courts was created, while all estates were equal before the law. Court hearings became public and also received media coverage. The parties now had the right to use the services of non-state lawyers.

The reform proclaimed the equality of all groups of the population in rights. The attitude of the state towards a person was now formed on the basis of his actions, and not on the origin.

The reform was inconsistent. For the peasants, special volost courts were created with their own system of punishments, which included beatings. If political cases were considered, then administrative repressions were applied even if the verdict was acquittal.

Zemstvo reform

Changes were made to the system of local self-government. Elections were scheduled for zemstvo and district councils, which were held in two stages. The local government was appointed for a four-year term.

Zemstvos dealt with issues of primary education, health care, taxation, etc. Local authorities were given a certain autonomy.

Most of the seats in the zemstvo authorities were occupied by nobles, there were few peasants and merchants. As a result, all issues affecting the interests of the peasants were resolved in favor of the landowners.

Military reform

Recruitment has been replaced by universal military service, covering all classes. Military districts were created, the main headquarters was founded.

The new system made it possible to reduce the size of the army in peacetime and quickly raise a large army if necessary. A large-scale rearmament has been carried out. A network of military schools was created, education in which was available to representatives of all classes. Corporal punishment in the army has been abolished.

In some cases, corporal punishment was retained - for "fined" soldiers.

Peasant reform

The personal independence of the peasant was legally established, and he was also given a certain allotment of land for permanent use with the subsequent right of redemption.

The obsolete and obsolete serfdom was finally abolished. Opportunity to significantly raise the standard of living rural population. Thanks to this, it was possible to eliminate the danger of peasant riots, which became commonplace in the country in the 1850s. The reform made it possible to negotiate with the landowners, who remained full owners of all their land, with the exception of small plots allocated for peasants.

The quitrent was preserved, which the peasants were obliged to pay to the landowner for several years for the right to use the land;

educational reform

A system of real schools was introduced, in which, unlike classical gymnasiums, the emphasis was on teaching mathematics and the natural sciences. A significant number of research laboratories have been established.

The people had the opportunity to receive a versatile and more secular education, to master the sciences in their modern (at that time) state. In addition, higher education courses for women began to open. The advantage for the ruling class was the elimination of the danger of the spread of revolutionary ideas, since young people were now educated in Russia, and not in the west.

Graduates of real schools were restricted from entering higher specialized educational institutions, and they could not enter the university at all.

urban reform

A system of city self-government was introduced, including city Duma, council and electoral assembly.

The reform allowed the population of cities to equip their urban economy: build roads, infrastructure, credit institutions, marinas, etc. This made it possible to revive the country's commercial and industrial development, as well as to introduce the population to civilian life.

The urban reform was openly nationalistic and confessional in nature. Among the deputies of the city duma, the number of non-Christians should not exceed a third, and the mayor should not have been a Jew.

Results of reforms

The "great reforms", as they are usually called in historical science, have significantly modernized and modernized Russian empire. The class and property inequality of various segments of the population was significantly smoothed out, although it persisted until the October Revolution. The level of education of the population, including the lower classes, has noticeably increased.

At the same time, clashes escalated between the "enlightened bureaucrats" who developed and implemented reforms, and the aristocratic nobility, who wanted to preserve the old order and their influence in the country. Because of this, Alexander II was forced to maneuver, removing the "enlightened bureaucrats" from business and reappointing them to their posts if necessary.

Significance of reforms

The "great reforms" had a dual meaning, which was originally planned by the tsarist government. On the one hand, the expansion of the rights and freedoms of citizens has improved the social situation in the country; the widespread dissemination of education had a positive impact on the modernization of the Russian economy and contributed to the development of science; military reform made it possible to replace the old, expensive and inefficient army with a more modern one, fully meeting its main tasks and causing minimal harm to the personality of a soldier in peacetime. The "Great Reforms" contributed to the disintegration of the remnants of the feudal system and the development of capitalism in Russia.

On the other hand, the liberal reforms strengthened the strength and authority of autocratic power and made it possible to combat the spread of radical revolutionary ideas. It just so happened that the most faithful supporters of unlimited royal power were precisely the liberal “enlightened bureaucrats”, and not the arrogant aristocratic elite. Education had a special role to play: young people had to be taught to think seriously in order to prevent the formation of superficial radical views in their minds.

RUSSIAN HISTORY

ABSTRACT

Great reforms of the 60-70s of the XIX century. Alexander II .

Content:

I.I.Alexander II before the coronation and in the first years of his reign.

II.II."Great Reforms" of 1863-1874.

A. The need for reform.

B. The abolition of serfdom.

B. Zemstvo reform.

D. Urban reform.

D. Judicial reform.

E. Military reform.

J. Financial reforms.

Z. Reforms in the field of education.

I. Reforms in the field of printing.

III.III.The assassination of the emperor.

IV.IV.The significance of the reforms of Alexander II in the history of the state.

I. I. Alexander II before the coronation and in the first years of his reign.

A Alexander II - Emperor of All Russia, the eldest son of Emperor Nikolai Pavlovich and Empress Alexandra Feodorovna, was born in Moscow on April 17, 1818.

Naturally, great importance was given to the upbringing and education of the future monarch. His educators were General Merder (company commander at the school of guards ensigns, who had remarkable pedagogical abilities, “a meek disposition and a rare mind”), M. M. Speransky, E. F. Kankrin. No less significant was the influence of another mentor - the famous poet Vasily Andreevich Zhukovsky, the head of his class studies. I would like to dwell in more detail on the education system of Zhukovsky, which provided not only general knowledge of the then accepted extensive set of subjects and four foreign languages, but also purely special knowledge: about the state, its laws, finances, foreign policy and formed a system of worldview. The basic principles of the upbringing of the Tsarevich looked like this:

WHO AM I? The doctrine of man, united by Christian doctrine.

WHAT WAS I? History, sacred history.

WHAT SHOULD I BE? Private and public morality.

WHAT AM I DESIGNATED FOR? Revelation religion, metaphysics, the concept of God and the immortality of the soul.

And at the end (and not at the beginning) law, social history, state economy, statistics arising from everything.

The acquired knowledge was reinforced by numerous travels. He was the first of the royal family to visit (in 1837) Siberia, and the result of this visit was to mitigate the fate of political exiles. Later, while in the Caucasus, the Tsarevich distinguished himself during the attack of the highlanders, for which he was awarded the order St. George 4th degree. In 1837, at the request of Nicholas I, he undertook a trip to Europe for educational purposes. He traveled to Switzerland, Austria, Italy and stayed for a long time in Berlin, Weimar, Munich, Vienna, Turin, Florence, Rome and Naples.

A major role in the life of Alexander II was played by a visit to Darmstadt, where he met Princess Maximilian-Wilhelmina-Augusta-Sophia-Maria (born July 27, 1824), the adopted daughter of Louis II, Duke of Hesse, who soon became the wife of the Tsarevich, Grand Duchess Maria Alexandrovna.

From the age of 16, Alexander successfully took part in management affairs, first sporadically, and then systematically. At the age of 26 he became a "full general" and had a fairly professional military training. In the last years of the reign of Emperor Nicholas and during his travels, he repeatedly replaced his father.

Alexander II ascended the throne on February 19, 1855 at the age of 36. He was to go down in history under the name of the Liberator. Already on the day of the coronation, August 26, the new manifesto of the sovereign was marked by a number of favors. Recruitment was suspended for three years, all state arrears, miscalculations, etc., were forgiven; various criminals were released, or at least the punishment was mitigated, including an amnesty for political prisoners - the surviving Decembrists, Petrashevites, participants in the Polish uprising of 1831; Recruitment of minor Jews was canceled, and recruitment between the latter was ordered to be carried out on a general basis; free travel abroad was allowed, etc. But all these measures were only the threshold of those global reforms that marked the reign of Alexander II.

During this period, the Crimean War was in full swing and took an unfavorable turn, where Russia had to deal with the combined forces of almost all the major European powers. Despite his peacefulness, which was also known in Europe, Alexander expressed his firm determination to continue the struggle and achieve peace, which was soon achieved. Representatives of seven states (Russia, France, Austria, England, Prussia, Sardinia and Turkey) gathered in Paris, and on March 18, 1856, a peace treaty was concluded. The peace of Paris, although not beneficial for Russia, was nevertheless honorable for her in view of such numerous and powerful opponents. However, its disadvantageous side - the limitation of Russian naval forces on the Black Sea - was eliminated during the life of Alexander II.

II. "Great reforms" of the 60-70s.

A. The need for reform.

P At the end of the Crimean War, many internal shortcomings of the Russian state were revealed. Changes were needed, and the country was looking forward to them. Then the emperor uttered the words that became for a long time the slogan of Russia: "Let her internal improvement be affirmed and improved; let truth and mercy reign in her courts; let the desire for enlightenment and all useful activity develop everywhere and with renewed vigor ..."

In the first place, of course, was the idea of ​​liberating the serfs. In his speech to representatives of the Moscow nobility, Alexander II said: "It is better to cancel it from above than to wait until it is itself canceled from below." There was no other way out, since every year the peasants expressed their dissatisfaction with the existing system more and more. The corvée form of exploitation of the peasant expanded, which caused crisis situations. First of all, the productivity of the labor of the serfs began to decline, as the landowners wanted to produce more products and thereby undermined the strength of the peasant economy. The most far-sighted landlords realized that forced labor was much inferior in productivity to hired labor (For example, a large landowner A.I. Koshelev wrote about this in his article “Hunting more than captivity” in 1847). But hiring workers required considerable expenses from the landowner at a time when serf labor was free. Many landowners tried to introduce new farming systems, apply the latest technology, purchase improved varieties of thoroughbred cattle, and so on. Unfortunately, such measures led them to ruin and, accordingly, to increased exploitation of the peasants. The debts of landowners' estates to credit institutions grew. Further development of the economy on the serf system was impossible. In addition, having existed in Russia much longer than in European countries, it has taken very harsh forms.

However, there is another point of view regarding this reform, according to which, by the middle of the 19th century, serfdom was still far from exhausting its capabilities and opposition to the government was very weak. Neither economic nor social catastrophe threatened Russia, but by retaining serfdom, it could drop out of the ranks of the great powers.

The peasant reform entailed the transformation of all aspects of state and public life. A number of measures were envisaged to restructure local government, the judiciary, education and, later, the army. These were really major changes, comparable only to the reforms of Peter I.

B. The abolition of serfdom.

3 January 1857, the first significant step was taken, which served as the beginning of the reform: the creation of the Secret Committee under the direct supervision and chairmanship of the emperor himself. It included: Prince Orlov, Count Lanskoy, Count Bludov, Minister of Finance Brock, Count V.F. Adlerberg, Prince V.A. Dolgorukov, Minister of State Property M.N. Muravyov, Prince P.P. Gagarin, Baron M.A. Korf and Ya.I. Rostovtsev. The purpose of the committee was designated as "discussion of measures to organize the life of the landlord peasants." Thus, the government tried to get initiative from the nobility in resolving this issue. The word "liberation" has not yet been spoken. But the committee acted very sluggishly. More precise actions began to be carried out later.

February 1858. The secret committee was renamed the “Main Committee on the Landlord Peasants Coming Out of Serfdom”, and a year later (March 4, 1859), Editorial Commissions were established under the committee, which reviewed the materials prepared by the provincial committees and drafted a law on the emancipation of the peasants. . There were two opinions here: the majority of the landlords proposed to free the peasants without land at all or with small allotments, while the liberal minority proposed to release them with land for redemption. At first, Alexander II shared the majority's point of view, but then he came to the conclusion that it was necessary to allocate land to the peasants. Historians usually associate such a decision with the strengthening of the peasant movement: the Tsar was afraid of a repetition of the “Pugachevism”. But no less important role was played by the presence in the government of an influential grouping, called the "liberal bureaucracy".

The draft "Regulations on the Peasants" was practically prepared at the end of August 1859, but for some time it was subject to minor corrections and clarifications. In October 1860, the Editorial Commissions, having completed their work, handed over the draft to the Main Committee, where it was discussed again and underwent further changes, but this time in favor of the landowners. On January 28, 1861, the project was submitted for consideration by the last instance - the State Council, which adopted them with some changes, in the sense of reducing the size of the peasant allotment.

Finally, on February 19, 1861, the "Regulations on the peasants who emerged from serfdom", which included 17 legislative acts, were signed by Alexander II. On the same day, the manifesto “On the most merciful granting to serfs of the rights of the state of free rural inhabitants” followed, in which it was proclaimed the release of 22.6 million peasants from serfdom.

The "Regulations" applied to 45 provinces of European Russia, in which there were 112,000 landowners' estates. First of all, it was declared obligatory for the landowner to allocate his former peasants, in addition to the estate land, arable and haymaking in a certain amount. Secondly, it was declared obligatory for the peasants to accept the allotment and keep in their use, for the duties established in favor of the landowner, the secular land allotted to them during the first nine years (until February 19, 1870). After nine years, individual members of the community were given the right both to leave it and to refuse to use field lands and lands if they bought their estate; the society itself also receives the right not to accept for its use such plots that individual peasants refuse. Thirdly, with regard to the size of the peasant allotment and the payments associated with it, according to general rules, it is customary to base on voluntary agreements between landowners and peasants, for which purpose to conclude a charter charter through mediators established by the situation, their congresses and provincial presences for peasant affairs, and in western provinces - and special verification commissions.

The “Regulation”, however, was not limited to the rules for allocating land to the peasants for permanent use, but made it easier for them to buy the allotted plots into their property with the help of a state redemption operation, and the government gave the peasants a certain amount on credit for the land they acquired with payment by installments for 49 years and, giving this amount to the landowner in state interest-bearing papers, he took all further settlements with the peasants upon himself. Upon approval by the government of the redemption transaction, all obligatory relations between the peasants and the landowner were terminated, and the latter entered the category of peasant proprietors.

"Regulations" were gradually extended to the peasants of the palace, appanage, ascribed and state.

But as a result of this, the peasantry remained bound by the community, and the land allocated to it turned out to be clearly insufficient to meet the needs of an ever-growing population. The peasant remained completely dependent on the rural community (the former “world”), which, in turn, was completely controlled by the authorities; personal allotments were transferred to the ownership of peasant societies, which periodically redistributed them “equalizing”.

In the spring and summer of 1861, the peasants, who did not receive, as expected, "full freedom", organized many uprisings. Outrage was caused by such facts as, for example: for two years the peasants remained subordinate to the landowner, were obliged to pay dues and perform corvée, were deprived of a significant part of the land, and those allotments that were given to them as property had to be redeemed from the landowner. During 1861 there were 1860 peasant uprisings. Peasant performances in the village of Bezdna, Kazan province, are considered one of the largest. Subsequently, disappointment with the inconsistency of the reform was growing not only among former serfs: articles by A. Herzen and N. Ogarev in Kolokol, N. Chernyshevsky in Sovremennik.

B. Zemstvo reform.

P after the peasant "Regulations" in the series administrative reforms one of the most important places is occupied, without any doubt, by the "Regulations on provincial and district zemstvo institutions", which was published on January 1, 1864.

According to the regulation, non-estate elected bodies of local self-government - zemstvos - were introduced. They were elected by all estates for a three-year term and consisted of administrative bodies (county and provincial zemstvo assemblies) and executive bodies (county and provincial zemstvo councils). Elections to zemstvo administrative bodies - meetings of vowels (deputies) - were held on the basis of a property qualification, by curia. The first curia (landowners) consisted of owners of land from 200 to 800 acres or real estate worth from 15,000 rubles. The second curia (city) united the owners of urban industrial and commercial establishments with an annual turnover of at least 6,000 rubles and owners of real estate for at least 2,000 rubles. The elections for the third curia (rural peasant societies) were multistage. Zemstvo assemblies elected executive bodies - zemstvo councils - consisting of a chairman and several members.

Zemstvos were deprived of any political functions, their activities were limited mainly to solving local issues. They were responsible for public education, for public health, for the timely delivery of food, for the quality of roads, for insurance, for veterinary care, and much more.

All this required a lot of money, so the zemstvos were allowed to introduce new taxes, impose duties on the population, and form zemstvo capitals. With its full development, zemstvo activity was supposed to cover all aspects of local life. New forms of local self-government not only made it all-class, but also expanded the range of its powers. Self-government was so widespread that many were understood as a transition to a representative form of government, so the government soon became noticeable desire to keep the activities of zemstvos at the local level, and not allow zemstvo corporations to communicate with each other.

In the late 1970s, zemstvos were introduced into 35 out of 59 Russian provinces.

G. Urban reform (in continuation of the Zemstvo).

1 On June 6, 1870, the "City Regulations" were published, according to which in 509 out of 1130 cities elective self-government was introduced - city dumas elected for four years. The city duma (administrative body) elected its permanent executive body - the city government, which consisted of the mayor (also elected for four years) and several members. The mayor was simultaneously the chairman of both the city duma and the city government. City councils were under the control of government officials.

The right to elect and be elected to the city duma had the right only to residents with a property qualification (mainly owners of houses, commercial and industrial establishments, banks). The first electoral assembly included large taxpayers who contributed a third of city taxes, the second - smaller ones, paying another third of taxes, the third - all the rest. In the largest cities, the number of vowels (elected) averaged 5.6% of the population. Thus, the bulk of the urban population was excluded from participation in urban self-government.

The competence of city self-government was limited to solving purely economic issues (improvement of cities, construction of hospitals, schools, care for the development of trade, fire prevention measures, city taxation).

D. Judicial reform.

IN among the reforms, one of the leading places, undoubtedly, belongs to the judicial reform. This deeply thought-out reform had a strong and direct influence on the entire system of state and public life. She introduced into it completely new, long-awaited principles - the complete separation of the judiciary from the administrative and accusatory, the publicity and openness of the court, the independence of judges, the advocacy and the adversarial procedure for legal proceedings.

The country was divided into 108 judicial districts.

The essence of judicial reform is as follows:

The court is made oral and public;

The power of the judiciary is separated from the prosecution and belongs to the courts without any participation of the administrative power;

The main form of legal proceedings is the adversarial process;

The case on the merits can be dealt with no more than in two instances. Two types of courts were introduced: world and general. The magistrate's courts, represented by a magistrate, tried criminal and civil cases, the damage in which did not exceed 500 rubles. Justices of the peace were elected by district zemstvo assemblies, approved by the Senate, and could be dismissed only at their own request or by court order. The general court consisted of three instances: the district court, the judicial chamber, the Senate. The district courts heard serious civil suits and criminal (juror) cases. The Trial Chambers heard appeals and were the court of first instance for political and state affairs. The Senate was the highest judicial instance and could cancel the decisions of the courts submitted for cassation.

In cases of crimes involving punishments, connected with the deprivation of all or some of the rights and advantages of the state, the determination of guilt is left to jurors, elected from local residents of all classes;

Eliminates clerical secrecy;

Both for intercession in cases and for the defense of defendants, there are sworn attorneys at the courts, who are under the supervision of special councils composed of the same corporation.

Judicial statutes extended to 44 provinces and were introduced into them for more than thirty years.

In 1863, a law was passed that abolished corporal punishment with gauntlets, whips, whips and brands on the verdicts of civil and military courts. Women were completely exempted from corporal punishment. But the rods were kept for the peasants (according to the verdicts of the volost courts), for the exiled, hard labor and penal soldiers.

E. Military reform.

IN military administration has also undergone transformations.

Already at the beginning of the reign, military settlements were destroyed. Degrading corporal punishment was abolished.

Particular attention was paid to raising the level of general education of army officers through the reform of military educational institutions. Military gymnasiums and cadet schools with a two-year term of study were created. They included persons of all classes.

In January 1874, all-class military service was proclaimed. The Supreme Manifesto on this occasion said: "Protection of the throne and the Fatherland is the sacred duty of every Russian subject ...". Under the new law, all young people who have reached the age of 21 are called up, but the government determines the required number of recruits every year, and draws only this number from the recruits (usually no more than 20-25% of recruits were called up for service). The call was not subject to the only son of the parents, the only breadwinner in the family, and also if the older brother of the recruit is serving or has served his service. Those enlisted in the service are listed in it: in the ground forces 15 years: 6 years in the ranks and 9 years in the reserve, in the navy - 7 years of active service and 3 years in the reserve. For those who have received primary education, the term of active service is reduced to 4 years, those who have graduated from a city school - up to 3 years, a gymnasium - up to one and a half years, and those who have higher education - up to six months.

Thus, the result of the reform was the creation of a small peacetime army with a significant trained reserve in case of war.

The system of military command and control has undergone fundamental changes in order to strengthen control over the locations of troops. The result of this revision was approved on August 6, 1864 "Regulations on the military district administrations." Based on this "Regulations", nine military districts were initially organized, and then (August 6, 1865) four more. In each district, a chief commander was appointed, appointed at the direct highest discretion, bearing the title of commander of the troops of the military district. This position may also be assigned to the local governor-general. In some districts, an assistant to the commander of the troops is also appointed.

By the end of the 19th century, the number of the Russian army was (per 130 million people): officers, doctors and officials - 47 thousand, lower ranks - 1 million 100 thousand. Then these figures declined and reached 742,000 people, while the military potential was maintained.

In the 60s, at the insistence of the Ministry of War, railways were built to the western and southern borders of Russia, and in 1870 railway troops appeared. During the 70s, the technical re-equipment of the army was basically completed.

Caring for the defenders of the Motherland was manifested in everything, even in small things. For example, for more than a hundred years (until the 80s of the XIX century), boots were sewn without distinction between the right and left legs. It was believed that during a combat alarm, a soldier had no time to think about which boot to wear, on which leg.

Special treatment was given to the prisoners. Soldiers who were taken prisoner and were not in the service of the enemy, upon returning home, received a salary from the state for the entire time they were in captivity. The prisoner was considered a victim. And those who distinguished themselves in battles were waiting for military awards. Orders of Russia were especially highly valued. They gave such privileges that they even changed the position of a person in society.

J. Financial reforms.

One of the main means of raising the economic power of the country was considered to be the construction of a network of railways linking the central regions of the European part of Russia. In connection with it, foreign leave increased 10 times, and the import of goods almost also increased. The number of commercial and industrial enterprises increased markedly, as well as the number of factories and plants. Credit institutions appeared - banks, headed by the State Bank (1860).

It was at this time that the first coal-mining and metallurgical enterprises were created in Ukraine and oil-producing enterprises in Baku.

Z. Reforms in the field of education.

H public education also attracted the attention of the king. Of particular importance in this regard was the publication of a new and general charter of Russian universities on July 18, 1863, in the development of which, on the initiative of the Minister of Education A.V. Golovkin, participated in a special commission at the main board of schools, composed mainly of professors from St. Petersburg University. The charter granted the universities a fairly broad autonomy: the election of the rector, deans, professors was introduced, the University Council received the right to independently resolve all scientific, educational, administrative and financial issues. And in connection with the development of universities, science began to develop at a rapid pace.

According to the Regulations on Primary Public Schools approved on June 14, 1864, the state, church and society (zemstvos and cities) were to jointly educate the people.

On November 19, 1864, a new regulation on gymnasiums appeared, which proclaimed equality in admission to all estates. But because of the high pay, it was available only to children of wealthy parents.

Attention was also paid to women's education. Already in the 60s, instead of the former closed women's institutions, open ones began to be arranged, with the admission of girls of all classes, and these new institutions were under the authority of the institutions of Empress Maria. Similar gymnasiums began to be approved by the Ministry of Public Education. In 1870, on May 24, a new Regulation on Women's Gymnasiums and Progymnasiums of the Ministry of Public Education was approved. The need for higher female education led to the establishment of pedagogical courses and higher female courses in St. Petersburg, Moscow, Kyiv, Kazan and Odessa.

I. Reforms in the field of printing.

In 1857, the government put the question of revising the censorship charter on the agenda. After the permission in 1858 to discuss in the press the problems of social life and the activities of the government, the number of periodicals (1860 - 230) and book titles (1860 -2058) increased sharply.

Already in 1862, the main department of censorship was closed and part of its duties was assigned to the Ministry of the Interior, and the other - directly to the Minister of Education.

On April 6, 1865, the “Temporary Rules on the Press” were approved, which exempted from preliminary censorship original works of at least ten pages, and translated works of at least twenty sheets, and some periodicals at the discretion of the Minister of the Interior. For periodicals, a large cash deposit was additionally required. Official and scientific publications were exempted from censorship.

The "Temporary Rules on the Press" operated practically unchanged for 40 years.

III. III. The assassination of the emperor.

AND Emperor Alexander II, who caused delight and surprise of enlightened people of the whole world, also met ill-wishers. Pursuing incomprehensible goals, the organizers created a number of attempts on the life of the sovereign, who was the pride and glory of Russia. On March 1, 1881, the sovereign, for whom a large population was ready to lay down his life, died a martyr's death from a villainous hand that threw an explosive projectile.

On this fateful day, Emperor Alexander II decided to make a divorce (the procedure for sending out daily guards for a shift). The path lay along a narrow street, made up of the garden of the Grand Duchess, fenced with a stone fence the height of a man and a lattice of the Catherine Canal. The terrain is very impassable, and if it is true that the sovereign chose it in view of the anonymous threats he received, then it is difficult to imagine why an ambush awaited him precisely on this path, except because they noticed a large, against the usual, number of police on it. Be that as it may, but when the sovereign's carriage reached the Theater Bridge, there was an explosion that broke open the back of the carriage, which immediately stopped. The sovereign emerged from it unharmed, but one of the escorts, galloping behind, and a sapper officer, walking along the sidewalk along the stone wall of the Mikhailovsky Garden, were mortally wounded by a thrown bomb. The sovereign's coachman, sensing trouble, turned to him from the goat: "Let's go, sovereign!" The chief of police, galloping behind, jumped out of the sleigh with the same request to go faster. But the emperor did not listen and took a few steps back: "I want to see my wounded." At this time, the crowd managed to stop a healthy kid who threw a bomb. The sovereign turned to him: “So it was you who wanted to kill me?” But he did not succeed in finishing, as the second bomb exploded in front of him, and he lowered himself with the words: “Help.” They rushed to him, lifted him up, put the chief of police in the sledge (who himself received 45 wounds from small fragments of the bomb, but not a single fatal one) and drove him away. A little over an hour later, at 3:35 pm, Tsar Alexander II died in the Winter Palace.

The eminent Russian philosopher V.V. Rozanov called the assassination of the emperor “a mixture of Madness and Meanness”.

The political testament of Alexander II was destroyed. Alexander III, in the consciousness of his past delusions and in an effort to return to the ideal of the kings of Moscow, turned to the people with a manifesto, which affirmed the inviolability of autocratic power and the exclusive responsibility of the autocrat before God.

The Russian Empire thus returned to the old traditional paths on which it had once found glory and prosperity.

IV. Significance of the reign of Alexander II in the history of Russia.

A Alexander II left a deep mark on history, he managed to do what other autocrats were afraid to take on - the liberation of the peasants from serfdom. We enjoy the fruits of his reforms to this day.

The internal reforms of Alexander II are comparable in scale only to the reforms of Peter I. The reformer tsar made truly grandiose transformations without social cataclysms and fratricidal war.

With the abolition of serfdom, commercial and industrial activity "resurrected", a stream of workers poured into the cities, and new areas for entrepreneurship opened up. Old ties were restored between cities and counties and new ones were created.

The fall of serfdom, the equalization of all before the court, the creation of new liberal forms of social life led to the freedom of the individual. And the feeling of this freedom awakened the desire to develop it. Dreams were created about the establishment of new forms of family and social life.

During his reign, Russia firmly strengthened its relations with the European powers, and resolved numerous conflicts with neighboring countries.

The tragic death of the emperor greatly changed the further course of history, and it was this event that 35 years later led Russia to death, and Nicholas II to a martyr's wreath.

LIST OF USED LITERATURE.

1. 1. S.F. Platonov "Lectures on Russian history", Moscow, publishing house " graduate School", 1993.

2. 2. V.V. Kargalov, Yu.S. Savelyev, V.A. Fedorov “History of Russia from ancient times to 1917”, Moscow, publishing house “ Russian word", 1998.

3. 3. "History of Russia from antiquity to the present day", edited by M.N. Zuev, Moscow, "Higher School", 1998.

4. 4. "History of the Fatherland for applicants to universities" edited by A.S. Orlov, A.Yu. Polunov and Yu.A. Shchetinov, Moscow, publishing house "Prostor", 1994.